Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:08:05.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Killing house-flies, Musca domestica L., by means of hanging drops of insecticide.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. G. Gostick  and
P. S. Hewlett
K. G. Gostick
Affiliation:
Pest Infestation Laboratory, Slough, Bucks.
P. S. Hewlett
Affiliation:
Pest Infestation Laboratory, Slough, Bucks.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Basic laboratory investigations have been carried out on a method for giving house-flies, Musca domestica L., relatively large doses of insecticide, with a view to possible applications in controlling, or preventing the appearance of, resistant strains of flies. The principle is that a relatively large drop of mineral oil will hang on the lower end of a thin vertical or near-vertical wire (e.g., a drop of up to 3 μl. on a wire 0·3 mm. in diameter), and a fleeting contact of a fly with the drop will generally transfer to the surface of the fly a substantial volume of oil. For investigational purposes pins were inserted obliquely into rods (e.g., about 700 pins into a rod 60 cm. long), and drops of up to about 1 μl. were formed on the ends of the pins by dipping the pin-bearing rods into solutions of insecticide in oil. In a typical experiment a rod with suspended drops was hung vertically from the ceiling of a chamber into which flies were released; flies then collected doses of insecticide when attempting to alight on the rod.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , November 1960 , pp. 523 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bucher, G. E., Cameron, J. W. MacB. & Wilkes, A. (1948). Studies on the housefly (Musca domestica L.). III. The effects of age, temperature, and light on the feeding of adults.—Canad. J. Res. (D) 26 pp. 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busvine, J. R. (1951). Mechanism of resistance to insecticides in houseflies.—Nature, Lond. 168 pp. 193–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, C. (1954). Genetical aspects of DDT-resistance in the housefly.—1st int. Symp. Contr. Insect Vect. Dis., Rome 1954 pp. 235–252.Google Scholar
Hewlett, P. S. (1947). The toxicities of three petroleum oils to the grain weevils.—Ann. appl. Biol. 34 pp. 575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewlett, P. S. (1954). A micro-drop applicator and its use for the treatment of certain small insects with liquid insecticide.—Ann. appl. Biol. 41 pp. 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewlett, P. S., Belcher, C. & Cordaroy, M. A. (1954). Micro-drop applicator.—Rep. Pest Infest. Res. Bd 1953 p. 18.Google Scholar
Keiding, J. (1959). House-fly control and resistance to insecticides on Danish farms.—Ann. appl. Biol. 47 pp. 612–618.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, J. W. & Schoof, H. F. (1956). The use of insecticide treated cords for housefly control.—Publ. Hlth Rep. 71 pp. 144–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkin, E. A. & Green, A. A. (1945). The toxicity of DDT to the housefly, Musca domestica, L.—Bull. ent. Res. 36 pp. 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, E. A. & Green, A. A. (1957). Houseflies and blowflies. [In] The UFAW handbook on the care and management of laboratory animals, 2nd edn., pp. 847–858. London, Univ. Fed. Anim. Welfare.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Schwardt, H. H. & Norton, L. B. (1951). New methods of house fly control in dairy barns.—Soap & sanit. Chem. 27 pt. 1 pp. 102–103, 105, 112A, 112C, 141.Google Scholar
Wichmand, H. (1953). Control of multi-resistant houseflies.—Nature, Lond. 172 pp. 758–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed