Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:01:03.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The isolation and inheritance of dieldrin resistance in the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E. Busch-petersen
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
R. J. Wood
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

Abstract

Four geographical strains of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) were subjected as third-instar larvae to mass selection with dieldrin. Two strains, SOUTH and COSRIC, responded well but continued to show substantial heterogeneity in tolerance to the insecticide after 21 and 25 generations of selection, respectively. The technique was altered to single family sib selection, resulting in the isolation from the SOUTH strain of a dieldrinresistant strain (73) showing a more homogeneous response to the insecticide. By the same technique, a dieldrin susceptible strain (72/3) was isolated from the COSRIC strain. A decline in resistance was observed in the 73 strain between generations three and four, but the level subsequently increased again, without selection, reaching 68-fold in generation seven. It remained high for the next two years. No significant change was observed in susceptibility to dieldrin of strain 72/3; it remained highly susceptible. Resistance to solutions of technical dieldrin (96%) was shown to be mainly under the control of a single major autosomal gene, intermediate in dominance but with a modifying effect of the genetic background on the expression of the resistance gene. The resistance heterozygotes, segregating in backcrosses to susceptible individuals, were shown to be more resistant than expected, while in backcrosses to resistant ones they were more susceptible. A dose of 11 p.p.m. dieldrin was found to discriminate almost completely between heterozygous and homozygous-susceptible individuals among backcross progeny. In tests using a purer form of the insecticide (99·7%), a similar pattern of resistance was observed. The implications for genetic sexing in C. capitata are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, R. S., Sakai, R. K. & Raana, K. (1981). Genetic sexing for the mosquito sterile male release.—J. Hered. 72, 216218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, J. (1960). A comparison of selective methods and a test of the pre-adaptation hypothesis.Heredity 15, 6577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. (1978). Ecology of pesticides.—525 pp. New York, J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Busch-Petersen, E. & Wood, R. J. (1983). Insecticide resistance as a prospective candidate for the genetic sexing of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wied.).—pp. 182–189 in Cavalloro, R. (Ed.). Fruit-flies of economic importance. Proceedings of the CEC/IOBC International Symposium, Athens, Greece, 16–19 November 1982.—642 pp. Rotterdam, A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. F. (1978). Genetic sex separation in Anopheles arabiensis and the production of sterile hybridsBull. Wld Hlth Org. 56, 453454.Google ScholarPubMed
Curtis, C. F., Akiyama, J. & Davidson, G. (1976). A genetic sexing system in Anopheles gambiae species A.Mosquito News 36, 492498.Google Scholar
Davidson, G. (1956). Insecticide resistance in Anopheles gambiae Giles: a case of simple Mendelian inheritance.Nature, Lond. 178, 863864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emeka-Ejiofor, S. A. I., Curtis, C. F. & Davidson, G. (1983). Tests for effects of insecticide resistance genes in Anopheles gambiae on fitness in the absence of insecticides.—Entomologia exp. appl. 34, 163168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to quantitative genetics.—365 pp. London, Longman.Google Scholar
FAO/IAEA (Food & Agricultural Organization/International Atomic Energy Agency)(1980). Report of the consultants’ meeting on a genetic sexing mechanism for the Mediterranean fruit fly.—160 pp. Vienna, Joint FAO/IAEA Division (mimeographed).Google Scholar
FAO/IAEA (Food & Agricultural Organization/International Atomic Energy Agency)(1983). Report on research co-ordination meeting on the development of sexing mechanisms in fruit flies through manipulation of radiation-induced lethals and other genetic measures.—137 pp. Vienna, Joint FAO/IAEA Division (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis.—3rd edn, 333 pp. London, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Georghiou, G. P. (1969). Genetics of resistance to insecticides in houseflies and mosquitoes.—Expl Parasit. 26, 224255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georghiou, G. P. & Taylor, C. E. (1977). Genetic and biological influences in the evolution of insecticide resistance.—J. econ. Ent. 70, 319323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurie-Ahlberg, C. C. & Merrell, D. J. (1979). Aldehyde oxidase allozymes, inversions and DDT resistance in some laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.—Evolution 33, 342349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misra, R. K. (1968). Statistical tests of hypothesis concerning the degree of dominance in monofactorial inheritance.—Biometrics 24, 429434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, D. C. & Brown, A. W. A. (1966). Inheritance of dieldrin-resistance and adult longevity in the cabbage maggot, Hylemya brassicae (Bouché).—Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 8, 7184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A. S. & van Heemert, C. (1982). Ceratitis capitata—a suitable case for genetic sexing.—Genetica 58, 229237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rössler, Y. (1975). Reproductive differences between laboratory-reared and field-collected populations of the Mediterranean fruitfly, Ceratitis capitata.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 68, 987991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rössler, Y. (1979). Automated sexing of Ceratitis capitata (Dip.: Tephritidae): the development of strains with inherited, sex-limited pupal color dimorphism.—Entomophaga 24, 411416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rössler, Y. (1982). Genetic sexing of insects by phenotypic characteristics, with special reference to the Mediterranean fruit fly.—pp. 291–306 in Sterile insect technique and radiation in insect control. Proceedings of a symposium, Neuherberg, 29 June-3 July 1981, jointly organized by IAEA and FAO.—495 pp. Vienna, Int. Atom. Energy Ag. (STI/PUB/595).Google Scholar
Sakai, R. K., Baker, R. H. & Javed, S. (1979). Genetic and linkage analyses of dieldrin resistance in Anopheles culicifacies Giles.—Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 73, 445450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SARH (Secretaria de Agricultura y Recursos Hidraulicos) (1980). Programa Mosca del Mediterraneo (informe anual).—124 pp. Mexico, SARH, Sanidad Vegetal (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Stone, B. F. (1968). A formula for determining degree of dominance in cases of monofactorial inheritance of resistance to chemicals.Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 38, 325326.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitten, M. J., Foster, G. G., Arnold, J. T. & Konowalow, C. (1975). The Australian sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.—pp. 401–418 in King, R. C. (Ed.). Handbook of genetics. Vol. 3. Invertebrates of genetic interest.—874 pp. London, Plenum.Google Scholar
Wong, T. T. Y. & Nakahara, L. M. (1978). Sexual development and mating response of laboratory-reared and native Mediterranean fruit fliesAnn. ent. Soc. Am. 71, 592596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R. J. (1967). A comparative genetical study on DDT resistance in adults and larvae of the mosquito Aedes aegypti L.—Genet. Res. 10, 219228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, R. J. & Busch-Petersen, E. (1982). Possible genetic sexing mechanisms for Ceratitis capitataWied.—pp. 279–289 in Sterile insect technique and radiation in insect control. Proceedings of a symposium, Neuherberg, 29 June-3 July 1981, jointly organized by IAEA and FAO.—495 pp. Vienna, Int. Atom. Energy Ag. (STI/PUB/595).Google Scholar