Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:00:36.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigations on the Cotton Bollworm, Heliothis armigera, Hübn. (obsoleta, Fabr.)*

PART 1.—The Annual March Of Bollworm Incidence And Related Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Extract

Methods for the quantitative survey of the incidence of Heliothis armigera have been in continuous operation in the Barberton area of the Eastern Transvaal from 1929 to the present; since 1933 the Survey was operated similarly in Swaziland and Northern Natal.

It was accepted early that the bollworm situation in cotton, which primarily it was desired to ameliorate, depends largely upon the influences exerted by other food-crops of the insect grown prior to and in association with cotton, and the investigations were instituted with a view to acquiring the fullest information on the incidence, habits and reactions of H. armigera with respect to the chain of cultivated and natural food-plant situations existing under differing climatic conditions in the course of the year.

The present paper is the first of a series communicating the results of investigations which proceed in various directions from information supplied by the Cotton Pest Survey centred upon Barberton. The paper deals with the annual course of bollworm incidence as indicated, in the first instance, by egg counts taken twice-weekly, year by year, in examples of all food-plant situations according to methods of sampling and calculation devised here.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Parsons, F. S. & Ullyett, G. C. (1934). Investigations on the control of the American and red bollworms of cotton in South Africa.—Bull. Ent. Res., 25, pp. 349381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Parsons, F. S. & Ullyett, G. C. (1936). Investigations on Trichogramma lutea, Gir., as a parasite of the cotton bollworm, Heliothis obsoleta, Fabr.—Bull. Ent. Res., 27, pp. 219235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Parsons, F. S. (1934). Second Conference on Cotton Growing Problems.—E.C.G.C. Rep. Summ. Proc., pp. 153155.Google Scholar
4.Parsons, F. S. Reports from Experiment Stations E.C.G.C., 1932–33, et seq.Google Scholar
5.Marshall, J. (1936). The distribution and sampling of insect populations in the field with special reference to the American bollworm, Heliothis obsoleta, Fabr.—Ann. Appl. Biol., 23, pp. 133152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kalamkar, R. J.A study in sampling technique with wheat.—J. Agric. Sci., 22, p. 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Marshall, Parsons & Hutchinson, . (1937). Studies on the red bollworm of cotton, Diparopsis castanea, Hampson: Part I, The distribution and ecology of two natural food-plants, Cienfuegosia hildebrandtii, Gürcke, and Gossypium herbaceum var. africana, Watt.Bull. Ent. Res., 28, pp. 621632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Taylor, J. S. Notes on the American Bollworm (Heliothis obsoleta, Fabr.) on cotton, and on its parasite, Microbracon brevicornis, Wesm.—Sci. Bull. 113. Dep. Agric. Un. S. Afr., 18 pp.Google Scholar
9.Parsons, F. S. (1937). The constitution of nectar secreted by the extra-floral glands of cotton—A natural food of the bollworm moth, Heliothis armigera, Hübn.—Proc. R. Ent. Soc. (A) 12, pp. 151154.Google Scholar