Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:25:13.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The injurious Effects of the Hooked Epidermal Hairs of French Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on Aphis craccivora Koch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Bruce Johnson
Bruce Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Rothamsted Experimental Station*.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The small, hooked epidermal hairs on french beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) may have a profoundly detrimental effect on colonies of Aphis craccivora. The hairs are present on the petioles, stems and undersurfaces of the leaves but are absent on the uppersurfaces of the leaves. They are most dense and therefore most injurious to the Aphids on the growing shoots. The Aphids' legs become impaled on the hooks and the results of the subsequent bleeding, starvation and exhaustion are decreased longevity and reproductive rate, high larval mortality, increased time of larval development and decreased size; this last factor is associated with a reduced fecundity. On some varieties of beans the hairs are less dense than on others and on these varieties the action of the hairs in inhibiting predators may be more important than their effect on the Aphids.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1953 , pp. 779 - 788
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alpatov, W. W. (1932). Egg production in Drosophila melanogaster and some factors which influence it.—J. exp. Zool., 63, pp. 81–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
V. Bogdandys, St. (1927). Ausrottung von Bettwanzen mit Bohnenblättern.— Naturwissenschaften, 15, p. 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fluiter, H. J. & Ankersmit, G. W. (1948). Gegevens betreffende de aantasting van bonen (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) door de zwarte bonenluis (Aphis (Doralis) fabae Scop.).—Tijdschr. PIZiekt., 54, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Hely, P. C. (1945). Fruit flies (Strumeta tryoni) trapped by bean leaves.—Agric. Gaz. N.S.W., 56, pp. 22–23.Google Scholar
Haberlandt, G. (1914). Physiological Plant Anatomy.—794 pp. London, MacmillanGoogle Scholar
McKinney, K. B. (1938). Physical characteristics on the foliage of beans and tomatoes that tend to control some small insect pests.—J. econ. Ent., 31, pp. 630–631.Google Scholar
Miller, L. W. (1947). Populations of Thrips tabaci Lind. on bean varieties.—J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci., 13, pp. 141–142.Google Scholar
Poos, F. W. & Smith, F. F. (1931). A comparison of oviposition and nymphal development of Empoasca fabae (Harris) on different host plants.—J. econ. Ent., 24, pp. 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, H. H. (1943). The action of bean leaves against the Bedbug.—J. econ. Ent., 36, pp. 543–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, F. (1944). Eine Ursache der raschen Blattlausvermehrung an Bohnen.—ForschErgebn. Gartenb., 1944, no. 5, repr. 4 pp.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, F. H. & Arny, A. C. (1932). A classification of the varieties of field beans, Phaseolus vulgaris.—J. agric. Res., 45, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Trouvelot, B. & Thenard, J. (1931). Remarques sur les éléments des végétaux contribuant à limiter ou à empêcher la pullulation du Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say sur de nombreuses espèces ou races végétales.—Rev. Path. vég., 18, pp. 277–285.Google Scholar