Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:32:33.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiments on the ectoparasitic deer ked that often attacks humans; preferences for body parts, colour and temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

R. Kortet*
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Department of Biology, PO Box 3000, FI-90014Oulu, Finland University of Joensuu, Faculty of Biosciences, PO Box 111, FI-80101Joensuu, Finland
L. Härkönen
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Department of Biology, PO Box 3000, FI-90014Oulu, Finland
P. Hokkanen
Affiliation:
Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Research Unit, PO Box 68, FI-80101Joensuu, Finland
S. Härkönen
Affiliation:
Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Research Unit, PO Box 68, FI-80101Joensuu, Finland
A. Kaitala
Affiliation:
University of Oulu, Department of Biology, PO Box 3000, FI-90014Oulu, Finland
S. Kaunisto
Affiliation:
University of Joensuu, Faculty of Biosciences, PO Box 111, FI-80101Joensuu, Finland
S. Laaksonen
Affiliation:
Finnish Food Safety Authority (Evira), Fish and Wildlife Health Research Unit, PO Box 517, FI-90101Oulu, Finland
J. Kekäläinen
Affiliation:
University of Joensuu, Faculty of Biosciences, PO Box 111, FI-80101Joensuu, Finland
H. Ylönen
Affiliation:
University of Jyväskylä, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, Konnevesi Research Station, PO Box 35, FI-40014Jyväskylä, Finland
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +358-8-553 1061 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) can fail in its host search. Host search fails when an individual deer ked irreversibly accepts a host unsuitable for its reproduction (e.g. a human) and drops its wings. In northern Europe, the main host of the deer ked is the moose (Alces alces). The deer ked is increasingly causing serious problems for humans (for example, causing deer ked dermatitis) and is considered a threat for the recreational use of forests. The adult deer ked flies in early and mid-autumn to search for a host. Our aims were: (i) to study whether there are ways to avoid deer ked attacks by wearing particular clothing, and (ii) to evaluate deer ked host choice. Using human targets, we explored the cues the deer ked uses for host selection. We studied which part of the host body deer keds target and if body colour and temperature affect their choice. In our experiments, deer keds landed more on dark and red clothing than on white clothing. Moreover, deer keds mostly attacked the upper body parts and preferred the back side of the body over the front side. Finally, deer keds preferred the warmest areas of the host.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alekseev, E.A. (1985) Initial experience with individual human protection from attack by the deer louse fly Lipoptena cervi. Meditsinskaia Parazitologiia I Parazitarnye Bolezni 6, 5657.Google Scholar
Allan, S.A., Day, J.F. & Edman, J.D. (1987) Visual ecology of biting flies. Annual Review of Entomology 32, 297316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, N.M. (1997) Phylogenetic tests of evolutionary scenarios: the evolution of flightlessness and wing polymorphism in insects. Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle 173, 91–108.Google Scholar
Bequaert, J.C. (1953) The Hippoboscidae or louse-flies (Diptera) of Mammals and Birds. Part 1. Structure, physiology and natural history. Entomological Americana 32, 1209.Google Scholar
Briscoe, A. & Chittka, L. (2001) The evolution of colour vision in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 46, 471510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clements, A.N. (1963) The Physiology of Mosquitoes. 393 pp. London, UK, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Constantini, C., Sagnon, N., della Torre, A., Diallo, M., Brady, J., Gibson, G. & Coluzzi, M. (1998) Odor-mediated host preferences of West African mosquitoes, with particular reference to malaria vectors. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 58, 5663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehio, C., Sauder, U. & Hiestand, R. (2004) Isolation of Bartonella schoenbuchensis from Lipoptena cervi, a blood-sucking arthropod causing deer ked dermatitis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 53205323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, C.W. & Patterson, B.D. (2006) Bat flies – obligate ectoparasites of bats. pp. 179194in Morand, S., Krasnov, B.R. & Poulin, R. (Eds) Micromammals and Macroparasites – From Evolutionary Ecology to Management. New York, USA, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, W.G. & Smith, J.J.B. (1977) Factors affecting feeding by bloodsucking insects. Annual Review of Entomology 22, 309331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, G. & Torr, S.J. (1999) Visual and olfactory responses of haematophagous Diptera to host stimuli. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 13, 223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfray, H.C.J. (1994) Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology. 520 pp. Princeton, NJ, USA, Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C.H. (1986) Effects of colours and synthetic odours on the attraction of Glossina pallidipes and G. morsitans morsitans to traps and screens. Physiological Entomology 11, 411421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haarløv, N. (1964) Life cycle and distribution pattern of Lipoptena cervi (L.) (Dipt., Hippobosc.) on Danish deer. Oikos 15, 93–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, W., Rantanen, T. & Vuojolahti, P. (1983) Immigration of Lipoptena cervi (Diptera, Hippoboscidae) in Finland, with notes on its biology and medical significance. Notulae Entomologicae 63, 5359.Google Scholar
Heikkinen, S. (2000) Hirven vuosi. Suomen Riista 46, 8291.Google Scholar
Hocking, B. (1971) Blood-sucking behaviour of terrestrial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 34, 477501.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R.A., Roth, A.R. & Lindquist, A.W. (1950) Effect of air temperature on the insecticidal action of some compounds on the sheep tick and on migration of the sheep tick on the animal. Journal of Economic Entomology 42, 893896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itämies, J. (1979) Hirvikärpäsiä sudella. Luonnon Tutkija 83, 19.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V.I. (1974) On the damage done by Lipoptena cervi L. (Diptera, Hippoboscidae) in Byelorussia. Parazitologiya 8, 252253.Google Scholar
Kaitala, A. (1988) Wing muscle dimorphism: two reproductive pathways of the waterstrider Gerris thoracicus in relation to habitat instability. Oikos 53, 222228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaitala, A., Kortet, R., Härkönen, S., Laaksonen, S. & Ylönen, H. (2008) Invasion of the moose ectoparasite Lipoptena cervi in Finland. pp. 3739in Baskin, L.M. (Ed.) Proceedings of the VIth International Moose Symposium. 13–23 August 2008, Yakutsk, Russia.Google Scholar
Kaunisto, S., Kortet, R., Härkönen, L., Härkönen, S., Ylönen, H. & Laaksonen, S. (2009) New bedding site examination-based method to analyse deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) infection in cervids. Parasitology Research 104, 919925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laukkanen, A., Ruoppi, P. & Mäkinen-Kiljunen, S. (2005) Deer ked-induced occupational allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. The Annals of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology 94, 604608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehane, M.J. (1991) The Biology of Blood-Sucking Insects. 228 pp. London, UK, Harper Collins Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, P.J. & Kelly, D.W. (2002) Learning and memory in disease vectors. Trends in Parasitology 18, 429433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, R., Kotrba, M. & Ferrar, P. (1999) Ovoviviparity and viviparity in Diptera. Biological Reviews 74, 199258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paakkonen, T. (2008) Hirvikärpänen ja sen vaikutukset hirveen ja poroon. p. 6 in Riistapäivät, Oulu. RKTL, 22–23 January 2008, Finland.Google Scholar
Petersen, F.T., Meier, R., Kutty, S.N. & Wiegmann, B.M. (2007) The phylogeny and evolution of host choice in the Hippoboscoidea (Diptera) as reconstructed using four molecular markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45, 111122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, P.W. (1997) Insect Ecology. 3th edn.874 pp. New York, USA, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Rantanen, T., Reunala, T., Vuojolahti, P. & Hackman, W. (1982) Persistent pruritic papules from deer ked bites. ACTA Dermato-Venereologica 62, 307311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reunala, T., Laine, M., Vornanen, M. & Härkönen, S. (2008) Hirvikärpäsihottuma – maanlaajuinen riesa. Duodecim 124, 16071613.Google Scholar
Robertson, B.A. & Hutto, R.L. (2006) A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87, 10751085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siivonen, L. & Sulkava, S. (1994) Pohjolan Nisäkkäät. 4th edn.224 pp. Helsinki, Finland, Otava.Google Scholar
Stireman, J.O. (2002) Host location and selection cues in a generalist tachinid parasitoid. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 103, 2334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutcliffe, J.F. (1986) Black fly host location: a review. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 10411053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetley, J.H. (1958) The sheep ked, Melophagus ovinus L. II. Keds acquired by a lamb from its mother. Parasitology 48, 364374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timms, R. & Read, A.F. (1999) What makes a specialist special? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14, 333334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinson, S.B. (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 21, 109133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1985) The behavior of parasitoids. pp. 417469in Kerkut, G.A. & Gilbert, L.I. (Eds) Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. Oxford, UK, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1998) The general host selection behavior of parasitoid hymenoptera and a comparison of initial strategies utilized by larvaphagous and oophagous species. Biological Control 11, 7996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S.B., Barfield, C.S. & Henson, R.D. (1977) Ovipositional behaviour of Bracon mellitor, a parasitoid of the boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). II. Associative learning. Physiological Entomology 2, 157164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar