Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:02:18.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrophoretic distinction between the peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae, and the tobacco aphid, M. nicotianae(Homoptera: Aphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Roger L. Blackman  and
Jennifer M. Spence
Roger L. Blackman*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
Jennifer M. Spence
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
*
Dr R.L. Blackman, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The electrophoretic mobility of the enzyme glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT) on cellulose acetate plates was compared among sibling species of the Myzus persicae (Sulzer) group (M. persicae, M. nicotianae Blackman, M. antirrhinii (Macchiati)). M. persicae itself is monomorphic for GOT-1 (genotype ff), whereas European populations of M. nicotianae are polymorphic for this enzyme, with two forms of slightly different mobility (alleles s, f). In the samples of M. nicotianae examined, M. persicae-likeff genotypes were rare and heterozygotes (sf) were in large excess, even in samples from Greece where M. nicotianae has a regular holocycle (i.e., annual sexual reproduction). In North America, where M. nicotianae is probably entirely anholocyclic, samples of both red and green colour morphs of this species were found to be heterozygous for GOT-1. The enzyme difference can thus provide a means of distinguishing most individual specimens, including trapped alatae, of M. persicae and M. nicotianae. The anholocyclic taxon M. antirrhinii appears to be a fixed heterozygote for GOT-1 and thus resembles most M. nicotianae, but can be distinguished electrophoretically from both M. persicae and M. nicotianae by its distinctive pattern of esterases.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 161 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackman, R.L. (1971) Variation in the photoperiodic response within natural populations of Myzus persicae (Sulz.). Bulletin of Entomological Research 60, 533–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackman, R.L. (1987) Morphological discrimination of a tobacco-feeding form from Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), and a key to New World Myzus (Nectarosiphon) species. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 713–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L., Brown, P.A., Furk, C, Seccombe, A.D. & Watson, G.W. (1989) Enzyme differences within species-groups containing pest aphids. pp. 271–295in Loxdale, H.D. & den Hollander, J. (Eds) Electrophoretic studies on agricultural pests. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blackman, R.L. & Takada, H. (1975) A naturally occurring chromosomal translocation in Myzus persicae (Sulzer). Journal of Entomology (A) 50, 147–156.Google Scholar
Brookes, C.P. & Loxdale, H.D. (1987) Survey of enzyme variation in British populations of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on crops and weed hosts. Bulletin of Entomological Research 77, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devonshire, A.L. (1989) The role of electrophoresis in the biochemical detection of insecticide resistance. pp. 363–374in Loxdale, H.D. & den Hollander, J. (Eds) Electrophoretic studies on agricultural pests. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
ffrench-Constant, R.H., Byrne, F.J., Stribley, M.F. & Devonshire, A.L. (1988) Rapid identification of the recently recognised Myzus antirrhinii (Macchiati) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Entomologist 107, 20–23.Google Scholar
Hebert, P.D.N. (1982) Heterosis in Daphnia: a reassessment. American Naturalist 119, 427–434.Google Scholar
Hebert, P.D.N. & Beaton, M.J. (1989) Methodologies for allozyme analysis using cellulose acetate electrophoresis. A practical handbook. 32pp. Beaumont, Texas, Helena Laboratories Inc.Google Scholar
Loxdale, H.D. & Brookes, C.P. (1990) Temporal genetic stability within and restricted migration (gene flow) between local populations of the blackberry-grain aphid Sitobion fragariae in south-east England. Journal of Animal Ecology 59, 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, B. & Holbrook, F.R. (1978) Absence of genetic variability in the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 71, 809–812.Google Scholar
Takada, H. (1986) Genotypic composition and insecticide resistance of Japanese populations of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hom., Aphididae). Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 102, 19–38.Google Scholar