Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:07:45.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of larval and pupal environmental factors on biological status of adults at emergence in Aedes taeniorhynchus (Wied.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. K. Nayar
J. K. Nayar
Affiliation:
Entomological Research Center, Florida State Board of Health, Vero Beach, Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Adults of Aedes taeniorhynchus (Wied.) were reared from larvae under five environmental variables—quantity of food, density of larvae, salinity of medium, light regime and temperature—singly and in combination. On emergence these adults were analysed for morphological characteristics, dry body weights, energy reserves and autogeny.

The minimal expression of adult characteristics and autogeny was effected by lack of food, crowding of larvae, and higher salinity, singly and in combination, at a constant temperature of 27°C. These three factors in turn showed a distinct relationship with delay in onset and prolongation of pupal ecdysis.

The maximal expression of adult characteristics and autogeny was found when 75 to 100 larvae per pan were reared on 2 × - or 4 × -basic ration in 10 to 25 per cent, sea water at 27°C. under alternating 12-hr. light-dark cycles. Above the optimal quantity of food, i.e., 2 × -basic ration, there was almost no enhanced effect on the adult characteristics; in fact, with 4 × - and 8 × -basic ration the morphological characteristics were suppressed. Of the three light regimes, continuous light produced adults that were largest, heaviest, had the most energy reserves and the highest level of autogeny. Adults reared on 4 × -basic ration in ten per cent, sea water under alternating 12-hr. light-dark cycles and at temperatures from 24 to 34°C. showed that even though largest mosquitos were obtained at 24°C, the heaviest mosquitos with maximal lipid and glycogen contents and maximal expression of autogeny were found at 28 and 30°C. Temperature changes during the pupal stage did not affect the adult characteristics.

Temperature and light regimes show distinct complex effects on adults at emergence, but the quantity of food, density of larvae and salinity of the rearing medium are more important.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , May 1969 , pp. 811 - 827
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakker, K. & Nelissen, F. X. (1963). On the relations between the duration of the larval and pupal period, weight and diurnal rhythm in emergence in Drosophila melanogaster.—Entomologia exp. appl. 6 pp. 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brust, R. A. (1967). Weight and development time of different stadia of mosquitoes reared at various constant temperatures.—Can. Ent. 99 pp. 986–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christophers, S. R. (1911). Development of the egg follicles in Anophelines.—Paludism 2 pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. (1960). Aedes aegypti (L.)—the yellow fever mosquito.— 839 pp. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Pr.Google Scholar
Clements, A. N. (1963). The physiology of mosquitoes.—394 pp. New York, Macmillan Co.Google Scholar
David, J. & Clavel, M. F. (1967). Influence de la température subie au cours du développement sur divers caractéres biométriques des adultes de Drosophila melanogaster Meigen.—J. Insect Physiol. 13 pp. 717–729.Google Scholar
Van Den Heuvel, M. J. (1963). The effect of rearing temperature on the wing length, leg length and ovariole number of the adult mosquito, Aedes aegypti L.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 115 pp. 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosoi, T. (1954). Egg production in Culex pipiens pallens Coquillett. IV. Influence of breeding conditions on wing length, body weight and follicle production.—Jap. J. med. Sci. Biol. 7 pp. 129–134.Google Scholar
Lang, C. A. (1963). The effect of temperature on the growth and chemical composition of the mosquito.—J. Insect Physiol. 9 pp. 279–286.Google Scholar
Lea, A. O. (1964). Studies on the dietary and endocrine regulation of autogenous reproduction in Aedes taeniorhynchus (Wied.).—J. med. Ent. 1 pp. 40–44.Google Scholar
Lum, P. T. M.. Nayar, J. K. & Provost, M. W. (1968). The pupation rhythm in Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae). III. Factors in developmental synchrony.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61 pp. 889–899.Google Scholar
Marks, E. N. (1954). A review of the Aedes scutellaris subgroup with a study of variation in Aedes pseudoscutellaris (Theobald) (Diptera: Culicidae).—Bull. Br. Mus. (nat. Hist.) Ent. 3 pp. 349–414.Google Scholar
Mer, G. (1937). Variations saisonnières des caractères de Anopheles elutus en Palestine. II.—Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 30 pp. 38–42.Google Scholar
Nayar, J. K. (1967). The pupation rhythm in Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae). II. Ontogenetic timing, rate of development, and endogenous diurnal rhythm of pupation.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60 pp. 946–971.Google Scholar
Nayar, J. K. (1968). The biology of Culex nigripalpus Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae). II. Adult characteristics at emergence and adult survival without nourishment.—J. med. Ent. 5 pp. 203–210.Google Scholar
Nielsen, E. T. & Evans, D. G. (1960). Duration of the pupal stage of Aedes taeniorhynchus with a discussion of the velocity of development as function of temperature.—Oikos. 11 pp. 200–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pausch, R. D. & Provost, M. W. (1965). The dispersal of Aedes taeniorhynchus. IV. Controlled field production.—Mosquito News. 25 pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Provost, M. W. & Lum, P. T. M. (1967). The pupation rhythm in Aedes taeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae). I. Introduction.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60 pp. 138–149.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. A. (1950). Osmotic regulation in mosquito larvae.—J. exp. Biol. 27 pp. 145–157.Google Scholar
Rozeboom, L. E. & Twohy, D. W. (1958). Comparison of nutritive reserves in males of autogenous and anautogenous populations of Culex pipiens.—J. Parasit. 44 pp. 422–424.Google Scholar
Spielman, A. (1957). The inheritance of autogeny in the Culex pipiens complex of mosquitoes.—Amer. J. Hyg. 65 pp. 404–425.Google ScholarPubMed
Twohy, D. W. & Rozeboom, L. E. (1957). A comparison of food reserves in autogenous and anautogenous Culex pipiens populations.—Am. J. Hyg. 65 pp. 316–324.Google Scholar
Wharton, D. R. A., Loal, J. E. & Wharton, M. L. (1967). Population density, survival, growth and development of the American cockroach.—J. Insect Physiol. 13 pp. 699–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed