Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:28:04.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic thresholds for cotton pest management in Sri Lanka

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

C. I. Keerthisinghe
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Regional Research Station, Angunukolapellesa, Sri Lanka

Abstract

Field experiments conducted on cotton in southern Sri Lanka, where the main pests were Heliothis armigera (Hb.), Earias vittella (F.) and Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.), indicated that a damage action threshold of five squares and six bolls per 30 plants could be used for forecasting and early warning in pest management. A parallel sampling study indicated that a sample size of 30 plants would reduce the sampling error to acceptable levels as well as being a more convenient number in the field. An expression that corrects experimentally established thresholds for changes in the cost of control and the market price of the yield is given.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hearn, A. B. & Room, P. M. (1979). Analysis of crop development for cotton pest management.—Protection Ecology 1, 265277.Google Scholar
Smith, R. F. & Falcon, L. A. (1973). Insect control for cotton in California.—Cott. Grow. Rev. 50, 1527.Google Scholar
Sterling, W. L. (1976). Sequential decision plans for the management of cotton arthropods in south-east Queensland.—Aust. J. Ecol. 1, 265274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, W. L. & Pieters, E. P. (1979). Sequential decision sampling.—Bull. South Coop. Ser. No. 231, 85101.Google Scholar
Tanskiĭ, V. I., Poloskina, F. M. & Kurdov, M. (1976). The threshold population density at which the bollworm, Heliothis armigera (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), causes appreciable damage.—Entomol. Rev. 55, 19.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. G. L., Hughes, R. D. & Gilbert, N. (1972). The response of cotton to pest attack.—Bull. ent. Res. 61, 405414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar