Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:06:24.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Description of Aphis (Doralis) rumicis, L., and Comparison with Aphis (Doralis) fabae, Scop.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. Jones Margaret
G. Jones Margaret
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Linnaeus (1746) described a black aphis which he found on Rumex sp. and called it Aphis rumicis. Fabricius (1794) described a black aphis “ Aphis rumicis,” found “in Rumice acuto” and mentioned pale antennae and tibiae. Risso (1826) recorded a species, Doralis rumicis, Leach, found in the Mediterranean region, but did not describe it. Koch (1857) recorded Aphis rumicis, L., from Rumex crispus, feeding chiefly on the stems and flower-stalks. This aphis is also frequently found on thistles and beans. The apterous female has black antennae, white only at the base of the long “ fourth joint.” The wing-pads and thorax of the alate nymphs are olive-green. Kaltenbach (1874) described black Aphids developing from eggs on dock, and having a second winged generation which settles on beans, thistles, Chenopodium sp., and other plants. He observed that the Aphid colonies are on the leaves and flower-stalks. Buckton (1879) gave an illustrated account of a black aphis, Aphis rumicis, L., which has a large number of food-plants including Rumex crispus, Carduus lanceolalus, and broad bean, with furze as its winter host. He noticed the presence of large white flecks on the “pupae.”

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , April 1942 , pp. 5 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balachowsky, A.Mesnil, L. (1936).Les insectes nuisibles aux plarites cultivées, 2, p.1277. Paris.Google Scholar
Börner, C. (1930).Arch. kiass. phylog. Ent, 1, p. 115.Google Scholar
Börner, C.Janisch, R. (1922). Nachr. BI. dtsch. PflSchDienst., 2, p. 65.Google Scholar
Börner, C.Schilder, F. A. (1932). In Sorauer, P., Handbuch der Pflanzen-krankheiten, 5, p. 551. Berlin.Google Scholar
Buckton, G. B. (1879).Monograph of British Aphides, 2, p. 81. London.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1925). J. Minist. Agric., 32 , p. 234.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. (1794). Entomologia Systematica, 4, p. 213. Hafniae.Google Scholar
Franssen, C. J. H. (1927). Tijdschr. P1. Ziekt., 33, p. 193.Google Scholar
Franssen, C. J. H. (1930). Z. angew. Ent., 17, p. 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hille Ris Lambers, D. (1934). Stylops, 3, p. 25.Google Scholar
Kaltenbach, J. H. (1874). Die Pflanzenfeinde aus der Classe der Insecten, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Koch, C. L. (1857). Die Pflanzenläuse, p. 140. Nürnberg.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1746). Fauna Suecica. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Petherbridge, F. R. (1939). Ann. Appl. Biol., 26, p. 397.Google Scholar
Risso, A. (1826). Histoire naturelle des principales productions de I'Europe meridionale, 5, p. 217.Google Scholar
Silvestri, F. (1939). Entomologia applicata, p. 452. Portici .Google Scholar
Theobald, F. D. (1927). Aphididae of Great Britain, 2, pp. 98, 400. London.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1938). Proc. Roy. Soc., (B) 126, p. 370.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H.Jones, F. G. W., (1937). Proc. Roy. Soc., (B) 124, p. 56.Google Scholar