Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:18:42.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The control of rice stem-borers (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) by insecticides applied to the roots of rice plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

B. N. Islam  and
M. A. Hamid Miah
B. N. Islam
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
M. A. Hamid Miah
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in Bangladesh in April–July and July–December to study the effectiveness of three methods of insecticide application to three varieties of rice against the stem-borers Scirpophaga incertulas (Wlk.) and Chilo polychrysus (Meyr.). In April–July, seedlings of the varieties IR8 and Dacca-14 were uprooted when 22 days old and treated individually with 0·0375%, 0·075%, 0·15% or 0·3% diazinon (as Diazinon 60 EC), dicrotophos (as Bidrin 85 EC) or carbaryl (as Sevin 85 SP) or 0·3% γ-BHC dust for 12, followed by dipping for 12 h in fresh water and then transplantation. In July–December, the same treatments were applied by controlled irrigation to the seedbeds of the varieties IR8 and Dacca-25 and for 40 h when the seedlings were 24 days old. In another experiment in July–December, granular formulations of diazinon (as Diazinon 5G), dicrotophos (as Bidrin 5G) and Sevidol (a mixed formulation of carbaryl 8G plus γ-BHC 8G) were also applied to the transplanted field at an interval of 20 days. Insecticides applied to uprooted seedlings reduced borer populations more in the case of variety IR8 than in Dacca–14. Diazinon applied at 0·3% to the variety IR8 and Dacca–25 effectively reduced the borer population to 4–8 and 10·5%, respectively, for up to 41 days; γ-BHC applied to the seedbed did not show much response. Dicrotophos was not highly effective in controlling the borers. Granular formulations of Sevidol at 1–5, 2 and 2–5 kg a.i./ ha and diazinon at 2–5 kg a.i./ha controlled stem-borers more effectively in variety IR8 than in Dacca-25. Variety IR8 was found more susceptible to the stem-borers than Dacca-25 and Dacca-14.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 69 , Issue 3 , September 1979 , pp. 395 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhanda, A. M. (1968). Report. Study on insecticides for rice. — 20 pp. Comilla, Pakistan Academy for Rural Development (now Bangladesh Academy of Rural Development).Google Scholar
Allen, W. W., Ota, A. K., Gehring, R. D. (1964). The effectiveness of various pesticides against resistant two-spotted spider mites on greenhouse roses. — J. econ. Ent. 57,187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appanna, M. (1959). Notes on paddy pests. — Mysore agric Cal. Yb. 1959, pp. 51–54.Google Scholar
Aquino, G. B., Pathak, M. D. (1976). Enhanced absorption and persistence of carbofuran and chlordimeform in rice plant on root zone application under flooded conditions. — J. econ. Ent. 69, 686–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banarjee, S. N., Basu, A. C. (1957). Experiments with a systemic insecticide for the control of Schoenobius incertulas (Walk.) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae), a stem borer of paddy in West Bengal. — Bull. ent. Res. 48, 299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, A. C. & Bera, B. K. (1963). Experiment on the control of Schoenobius incertulas (Walk.) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) by the routine application of few modern insecticides. — Indian J. agric. Sci. 33, 11–16.Google Scholar
Bobb, M. L. (1966). Effectiveness of insecticides for control of the lesser peach tree borer. — J. econ. Ent. 59, 971–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantelo, W. W., Kovitvadhi, K. (1967). Effectiveness of insecticides applied to the root area of the rice plant in controlling the rice gall midge. — J. econ. Ent. 60, 109–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRRI (1954). Annual report for 1949–50 and 1950–1951. Cuttak 6, India, Central RiceResearch Institute, pp. 19–23.Google Scholar
CRRI (1961). 1958–60 Technical report. — 95 pp. Cuttak 6,IndiaCentral Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Eldefrawi, M. E. & Hoskins, W. M. (1961). Relation of the rate of penetration and metabolism to the toxicity of Sevin to three insect species. — J. econ. Ent. 54, 401–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, W. E., Sun, Y. P.. (1965). Mechanism of detoxification and synergism of bidrin insecticide in house flies and soil.–J. econ. Ent. 58, 845–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helson, G. A. H., Meeklah, W. F. A., Darwin, R. K.. & Robertson, T. G. (1964).Evaluation of diazinon, trichlorfon and Bacillus thuringiensis in the control of subterranean grass caterpillar.— Proceedings 17th NZ. Weed and Pest Control Conference, Wellington, pp. 165–167.Google Scholar
IRRI (1965). Annual Report 1965. —357 pp. The Philippines, International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
IRRI (1966). Annual Report 1966. — 302 pp. The Philippines, International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
IRRI (1973). Annual Report 1973.—266 pp.The Philippines, International Rice Research Institute.Google Scholar
Iwata, T. (1973). Rice insect control by fine granular formulation of insecticide in Japan. — Japan Pestic Inf. 14, 23–26.Google Scholar
Kabir, S. M. H. (1968). Insect pests of rice in East Pakistan and their control. — PANS (A) 14, 244–248.Google Scholar
Kawada, A. (1967). Developments in insecticide control of the rice stem borer in Japan pp. 325–334in The major insect pests of the rice plant.—Proc. Symp. IRRI, 1964. Baltimore, Md., Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Koshihara, T., Okamoto, D. (1957). Control of rice stem borer by the application of BHC dust in the paddy field soil (in Japanese). — Jap. J. appl. Ent. Zool. 1, 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koyama, T. (1971). Lethal mechanisms of granulated insecticides. — PANS 17, 198–201.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y. & Hong, W. Y. (1963). Residual toxicity of some insecticides against the newly hatched larva of the paddy borer, Schoenobius incertulas. — Agric Res, Taipei 12,40–51.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y. (1965). Laboratory studies of the translocation of benzene hexachloride in rice for control of the asiatic rice borer, Chilo suppressalis. — J. econ. Ent. 58, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patanakamjorn, S. & Pathak, M. D. (1967).Varietal resistance of rice to the Asiatic rice borer, Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and its association with various plant characters. — Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60, 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathak, M. D. (1967). Recent developments in and future prospects for the chemical control of the rice stem borer at IRRI, pp. 335–349in The major insect pests of the rice plant.—Proc. Symp. IRRI, 1964. Baltimore, Md, Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Pathak, M. D. & Dyck, V. A. (1973). Developing an integrated method of rice insect pest control. — PANS 19, 534–544.Google Scholar
Shanks, C. H. Jr. (1966). Apparent increase in population of the strawberry aphid caused by phorate and disulfoton. — J. econ. Ent. 59, 935–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqui, A. A. (1958). The practical uses of systemic insecticides. — Pakist J Sci. 10, 203–204.Google Scholar
Tao, C. H. (1958). Field tests of insecticides against paddy borer in Taiwan from 1953–56. — J. econ. Ent. 51, 571–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, I. J. (1956). Pot experiments on the insecticidal control of padi stem borers. — Bull Agric Fed Malaya. 101, p. 29.Google Scholar
Yasumatsu, K.. & Torii, T. (1968). Impact of parasites, predators and diseases on rice pests. — A. Rev. Ent. 13, 295–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar