Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:46:34.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Control of Onion Fly, Delia antiqua (MG.), with Seed Dressings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Extract

Seed treatments of calomel, DDT, dieldrin and aldrin were compared in three seasons′ field trials for use against onion fly, Delia antiqua (Mg.). Excellent control and also improved germination were obtained with 0·5 oz. actual dieldrin per lb. of seed applied with a sticker, with or without thiram. Similar results were obtained with 0·1 and 1·5 oz. actual dieldrin per Ib. of seed, but 3·2 oz. reduced germination. Aldrin at the same rates gave excellent control but reduced germination. DDT at 1·5 oz. and 3·2 oz. gave good control early in the season, but was not sufficiently persistent and seriously reduced germination. Calomel gave little control, although it improved germination.

Although kerosene used as a sticker for a dust was satisfactory, it was liable to reduce germination seriously when used alone, except at very low rates.

Seed treated with DDT, dieldrin or aldrin may be stored safely for a month or two in unsealed containers but not in sealed containers.

There was close correlation between the percentage of plants attacked and the yield per 100 plants in the original stand. For every 10 per cent. of plants killed by onion fly there was a 10 per cent. loss of the potential yield.

Even where the onion-fly attack was heavy, comparatively few plants showed symptoms of damage at any one time, which suggests that the level of attack is frequently under-estimated.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Besemer, A. F. H. & Van De Vliet, M. (1956). Bestrijding van de uievlieg, Chortophila antiqua Mg. door een zaadbehandeling met gechloreerde koolwaterstoffen.—Versl. PlZiekt. Dienst Wageningen no. 129 pp. 172176.Google Scholar
Croxall, H. E., Sidwell, R. W. & Jenkins, J. E. E. (1953). White rot (Sclerotium cepivorum) of onions in Worcestershire with special reference to control by seed treatment with calomel.—Ann. appl. Biol. 40 pp. 166175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, D. G. (1957). Further experiments on control of the onion maggot, Hylemya antiqua (Mg.), in the interior of British Columbia.—Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 37 pp. 252258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlayson, D. G. & Handford, R. H. (1954). Experiments on control of the onion maggot, Hylemya antiqua (Meig.) in the interior of British Columbia.—Canad. J. agric. Sci. 34 pp. 385388.Google Scholar
Heringa, J. W. [?1947]. Onderzoek naar een vervangingsmiddel voor calomel ter bestrijding van de uienvlieg.—Rep. 1st int. Congr. Pl. Prot. pp. 337350.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. (1955). Løgfluen, Hylemyia antiqua, Meig. Resultater af nogle biologiske undersøgelser og bekaempelsesforsøg.—Tidsskr. Planteavl 59 pp. 252279.Google Scholar
Larson, R. H. & Walker, J. C. (1953). Thiram for smut control in onion set plantings.—Phytopathology 43 pp. 596597.Google Scholar
Maan, W. J. (1947). Zaadbehandeling met D.D.T. tegen de uienvlieg.—Tijdschr. PlZiekt. 53 pp. 1113.Google Scholar
McLeod, W. S. (1946). Hexachlorocyclohexane in the control of onion maggot.— J. econ. Ent. 39 pp. 631637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, M. (1955). Studies of British Anthomyiid flies. VII. The onion-fly complex.—Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 2126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggell, D. (1956). Control of white rot in onions.—Plant Path. 5 pp. 6061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. W. (1938). The control of the onion fly.—J. Minist. Agric. 44 pp. 10811087.Google Scholar
Wright, D. W. (1939). The control of onion fly (Delia (Hylemyia) antiqua Meig.).—Agriculture 46 pp. 147154.Google Scholar