Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:20:11.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of the Diptera caught in Manitoba traps with those caught from cattle and other parts of the field ecosystem in northern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

S. G. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Biology, The University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK

Abstract

Manitoba traps were used in a pasture field in northern England between June and October in 1980 and 1981.Samples of Diptera were also collected from cattle, cow dung, the field surface and from flowers in the hedges. A comparison of these samples, using multivariate similarity coefficients, showed that the Manitoba trap and cattle samples were most similar. There were 12 weeks in the two years during which both Manitoba trap and cattle samples were obtained, and the accumulated catches for this period were compared. They consisted mainly of cattle-visiting species, the proportion being greatest in the Manitoba trap samples (97%). Non-cattle-visiting species in the cattle sample (25%) consisted mainly of dung flies and species associated with the field surface. It is suggested that these were taken accidentally in proportion to their abundance around the cattle. There were some differences in the proportions of various species between the samples from cattle and the Manitoba trap, and the sex ratio of the three most abundant species was significantly higher in the traps. An experiment in which a large electrocuting grid was used to intercept flies travelling towards artificial bait as used in Manitoba traps, showed that the proportion of the two most abundant species differed significantly from a sample obtained from a nearby Manitoba trap. No such difference was observed in the sex ratios of these species.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, S. G. & Luff, M. L. (1981). Attractiveness of Manitoba traps to the headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallen) (Diptera: Muscidae): the effects of short-term weather fluctuations, carbon dioxide and target temperature and size. —Bull. ent. Res. 71, 599606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlyn, A. D. (1978 a). The flight activity of the sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallé;n) (Diptera: Muscidae). —Bull. ent. Res. 68, 219228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlyn, A. D. (1978 b). The field biology of the adult sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallen)(Diptera: Muscidae), in south-western Scotland. —Bull. ent. Res. 68, 431436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlyn, A. D. (1978 c). Factors attracting the sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallen) (Diptera:Muscidae), with a note on the evaluation of repellents. —Bull. ent. Res. 68, 583588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlyn, A. D. (1979). The effect of diet on the life-span and egg maturation of caged adult sheep headflies, Hydrotaea irritans (Fallé;n) (Diptera: Muscidae). —Bull. ent. Res. 69, 299307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, E. C. M, D'Assis, (1968). Diptera Cyclorrhapha Calyptrata. Muscidae. —Handbk Ident. Br.Insects. 10 (4b), 119 pp.Google Scholar
Hammer, O. (1941). Biological and ecological investigations on flies associated with pasturing cattle and their excrement. —Vidensk. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren. 105, 257 pp.Google Scholar
Hower, A. A. Jr, Cheng, T. H. (1972). A field-cage study of feeding behaviour of the face fly on dairy cattle. —J. econ. Ent. 65, 602604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, R. D., Duncan, P., Dawson, J. (1981). Interactions between Camargue horses and horseflies (Diptera: Tabanidae). —Bull. ent. Res. 71, 227242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, A. C., Tarry, D. W. (1973). A survey of some species of flies associated with cattle. —Int. Pest Contr. 15 (5), 610.Google Scholar
Kloet, G. S. & Hincks, W. D. (1976). A check list of British insects. Second edition. Part 5: Diptera and Siphonaptera.Handbk Ident. Br. Insects 11 (5), 139 pp.Google Scholar
Mair, K. H., Centurier, C., Boch, J. (1980). Dipteren als Lastlinge an Jungrindern auf Bergweiden. —Bert. Munch, tierantl. Wschr. 93, 108112.Google Scholar
Minar, J., Riha, J., Lamatova, Z. (1979). Losses in milking qualities of dairy cattle caused by mosquitoes and horseflies and reduction of such losses due to use of diethyltoluamide repellent. —Folia Parasit. 26, 285—288.Google ScholarPubMed
Parsons, A. J. (1977). Biting muscid flies. —Vet. Rec. 100, 341342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J. (1978). The biology of the sheep headfly, Hydrotaea irritans Fall.: with reference to its control. —Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Newcastle upon Tyne, 207 pp.Google Scholar
Tarry, D. W. (1975). The significance of feeding and blood-meal identification studies in the planning of sheep headfly control measures. — pp. 573580 in Proceedings of the Eighth British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference, 17 to 20 November 1975, Hotel Metropole. Brighton, England. Volume 2. — pp. 373. London, Br. Crop Prot. Coun.Google Scholar
Tarry, D. W., Kirkwood, A. C. (1974). Hydrotaea irritans: the sheep headfly in Britain. —Br. vet. J. 130, 180188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarry, D. W., Kirkwood, A. C. (1976). Biology and development of the sheep headfly Hydrotaea irritans (Fall.) (Diptera, Muscidae). — Bull. ent. Res. 65, 587594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarry, D. W., Wilson, C. D., Stuart, P. (1978). The headfly Hydrotaea irritans and summer mastitis infection. —Vet. Rec. 102, 91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorsteinson, A. J., Bracken, G. K., Hanec, W. (1964). The Manitoba horsefly trap. — Can. Ent. 96, 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchener, R. N., Newbold, J. W., Wright, C. L. (1981). Flies associated with cattle in south west Scotland during the summer months. —Res. vet. Sci. 30, 109113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vale, G.A. (1980). Field studies of the esponses of tsetse flies (Glossinidae) and other Diptera to carbon dioxide, acetone and other chemicals. —Bull. ent. Res. 70, 563570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar