Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:36:22.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative demography of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on deciduous fruit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

Welma Pieterse Open the ORCID record for Welma Pieterse [Opens in a new window] ,
Aruna Manrakhan ,
John S. Terblanche  and
Pia Addison
Welma Pieterse*
Affiliation:
Department of Conservation Ecology & Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Plant Quarantine Station, Stellenbosch7600, South Africa
Aruna Manrakhan
Affiliation:
Citrus Research International, PO Box 28, Nelspruit1200, South Africa
John S. Terblanche
Affiliation:
Department of Conservation Ecology & Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Pia Addison
Affiliation:
Department of Conservation Ecology & Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
*
Author for correspondence: Welma Pieterse, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) and Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) are highly polyphagous fruit fly species and important pests of commercial fruit in regions of the world where they are present. In South Africa, B. dorsalis is now established in the north and northeastern parts of the country. B. dorsalis is currently absent in other parts of the country including the Western Cape Province which is an important area for the production of deciduous fruit. C. capitata is widespread in South Africa and is the dominant pest of deciduous fruit. The demographic parameters of B. dorsalis and C. capitata on four deciduous fruit types Prunus persica (L.) Batsch, Prunus domestica L., Malus domestica Borkh. and Pyrus communis L. were studied to aid in predicting the potential population establishment and growth of B. dorsalis in a deciduous fruit growing environment. All deciduous fruit types tested were suitable for population persistence of both B. dorsalis and C. capitata. Development was fastest and survival highest on nectarine for both species. B. dorsalis adults generally lived longer than those of C. capitata, irrespective of the fruit types that they developed from. B. dorsalis had a higher net reproductive rate (Ro) on all deciduous fruit tested compared to C. capitata. However, the intrinsic rate of population increase was estimated to be higher for C. capitata than for B. dorsalis on all fruit types tested primarily due to C. capitata's faster generation time. Provided abiotic conditions are optimal, B. dorsalis would be able to establish and grow in deciduous fruit growing areas.

Keywords

ApplenectarinepearplumTephritidae
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 185 - 194
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, SAI, Mohamed, SA, Mahmoud, MEE, Sabiel, SAI, Ali, S and Ali, A (2014) Monitoring of Tephritidae of fruit trees and their level of infestation in South Kordofan State, Sudan. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research 2, 2319–1473.Google Scholar
Anonymous (2016) Key Deciduous Fruit Statistics 2016. Hortgro. http://hortgro.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/key-deciduous-fruit-statistics-2016.pdf (Accessed 5 September 2017).Google Scholar
Barnes, B, Rosenberg, S., Arnolds, L and Johnson, J (2007) Production and Quality Assurance in the SIT Africa Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) rearing facility in South Africa. Florida Entomologist 90, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, BN, Hofmeyr, JH, Groenewald, S, Conlong, DE and Wohlfarter, M (2015) The sterile insect technique in agricultural crops in South Africa: a metamorphosis…. but will it fly? African Entomology 23, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, MA (1972) The ecology of fruit flies. Annual Review of Entomology 17, 493–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bess, HA and Haramoto, FH (1961) Contributions to the biology and ecology of the Oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae), in Hawaii. Technical Bulletin 44 University of Hawaii College of Tropical Agriculture, Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, Honolulu, Hawaii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, L (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. The Journal of Animal 17(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
Birke, A and Aluja, M (2018) Do mothers really know best? Complexities in testing the preference-performance hypothesis in polyphagous frugivorous fruit flies. Bulletin of Entomological Research 108(5), 674–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burk, T and Calkins, CO (1983) Medfly mating behaviour and control strategies. The Florida Entomologist 66, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, JR (1982) Demography and population dynamics of the Mediterranean fruit fly. Ecological Modelling 16, 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, JR (1984) Host-specific demographic studies of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata. Ecological Entomology 9, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, JR and Vargas, RI (1985) Demographic analysis of insect mass rearing: a case study of three tephritids. Journal of Economic Entomology 78, 523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, JR, Liedo, P, Orozco, D, Tatar, M and Vaupel, JW (1995) A male–female longevity paradox in medfly cohorts. Journal of Animal Ecology 46, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, JR, Harshman, LG, Liedo, P, Müller, HG, Wang, JL and Zhang, Z (2008) Longevity–fertility trade-offs in the tephritid fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens, across dietary-restriction gradients. Aging Cell 7, 470–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catford, JA, Jansson, R and Nilsson, C (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity and Distributions 15, 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P, Ye, H and Liu, J (2006) Population dynamics of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) and analysis of the factors influencing the population in Ruili, Yunnan Province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 26, 2801–2808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesson, P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31, 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, MY, Mau, FL, Jang, EB, Vargas, RI and Piñero, JC (2012) Morphological features of the ovaries during oogenesis of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, in relation to the physiological state. Journal of Insect Science 12, 144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Meyer, M, Copeland, RS, Wharton, RA, Mcpheron, BA and Barnes, BN (2002) On the geographic origin of the Medfly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Proceedings of the 6th International Fruit Fly Symposium. Stellenbosch, South Africa, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
De Meyer, M, Mohamed, S and White, IM (2012) Invasive Fruit Fly Pests in Africa: A diagnostic tool and information reference for the four Asian species of fruit fly (Diptera, Tephritidae) that have become accidentally established as pests in Africa, including the Indian Ocean Islands. Available at http://www.africamuseum.be/fruitfly/AfroAsia.htm (Accessed 19 February 2018).Google Scholar
De Villiers, M, Manrakhan, A, Addison, P and Hattingh, V (2013) The distribution, relative abundance, and seasonal phenology of Ceratitis capitata, Ceratitis rosa, and Ceratitis cosyra (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South Africa. Environmental Entomology 42, 831–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, M, Hattingh, V, Kriticos, DJ, Brunel, S, Vayssières, JF, Sinzogan, A, Billah, MK, Mohamed, SA, Mwatawala, M, Abdelgader, H, Salah, FEE and De Meyer, M (2016) The potential distribution of Bactrocera dorsalis: considering phenology and irrigation patterns. Bulletin of Entomological Research 106, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diatta, P, Rey, JY, Vayssieres, JF, Diarra, K, Coly, EV, Lechaudel, M, Grechi, I, Ndiaye, S and Ndiaye, O (2013) Fruit phenology of citruses, mangoes and papayas influences egg-laying preferences of Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fruits 68, 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, RAI, Tsuruta, K and White, IM (2005) A new species of pest fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) from Sri Lanka and Africa. African Entomology 13(1), 149–154.Google Scholar
Ekesi, S, Nderitu, PW and Rwomushana, I (2006) Field infestation, life history and demographic parameters of the fruit fly Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 379–386.Google Scholar
Ekesi, S, Nderitu, PW and Chang, CL (2007) Adaptation to and small-scale rearing of invasive fruit fly Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) on artificial diet. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 100, 562–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, MI, Tomás-Barberán, FA, Hess-Pierce, B and Kader, AA (2002) Antioxidant capacities, phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and vitamin C contents of nectarine, peach, and plum cultivars from California. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 4976–4982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goergen, G, Vayssières, JF, Gnanvossou, D and Tindo, M (2011) Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae), a new invasive fruit fly pest for the Afrotropical region: host plant range and distribution in West and Central Africa. Environmental Entomology 40, 844–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grove, T, De Jager, K and De Beer, MS (2017) Indigenous hosts of economically important fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South Africa. Journal of Applied 14(10), 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12381.Google Scholar
Hafsi, A, Facon, B, Ravigné, V, Chiroleu, F, Quilici, S, Chermiti, B and Duyck, PF (2016) Host plant range of a fruit fly community (Diptera: Tephritidae): does fruit composition influence larval performance? BMC Ecology 16, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-016-0094-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, MP and Terblanche, JS (2014) Niche overlap of congeneric invaders supports a single-species hypothesis and provides insight into future invasion risk: implications for global management of the Bactrocera dorsalis complex. PLoS One 9, e90121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussain, MA, Haile, A and Ahmad, T (2015) Infestation of two tephritid fruit flies, Bactrocera dorsalis (syn. B. invadens) and Ceratitis capitata, in guava fruits from selected regions of Eritrea. African Entomology 23, 510–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imeh, U and Khokhar, S (2002) Distribution of conjugated and free phenols in fruits: antioxidant activity and cultivar variations. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50, 6301–6306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khamis, FM, Karam, N, Ekesi, S, De Meyer, M, Bonomi, A, Gomulski, LM, Scolari, F, Gabrieli, P, Siciliano, P, Masiga, D and Kenya, EU (2009) Uncovering the tracks of a recent and rapid invasion: the case of the fruit fly pest Bactrocera invadens (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Africa. Molecular Ecology 18(23), 4798–4810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebhold, AM and Tobin, PC (2008) Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annual Review of Entomology 53, 387–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liquido, NJ, Cunningham, RT and Nakagawa, S (1990) Host plants of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) on the Island of Hawaii (1949–1985 survey). Journal of Economic Entomology 83, 1863–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi-Boccia, G, Lucarini, M, Lanzi, S, Aguzzi, A and Cappelloni, M (2004) Nutrients and antioxidant molecules in yellow plums (Prunus domestica L.) from conventional and organic productions: a comparative study. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52, 90–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lux, SA, Copeland, RS, White, IM, Manrakhan, A and Billah, MK (2003) A new invasive fruit fly species from the Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) group detected in East Africa. Insect Science and its Application 23, 355–361.Google Scholar
Malacrida, AR, Gomulski, LM, Bonizzoni, M, Bertin, S, Gasperi, G and Guglielmino, CR (2007) Globalization and fruitfly invasion and expansion: the medfly paradigm. Genetica 131, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manrakhan, A and Addison, P (2013) Assessment of fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) management practices in deciduous fruit growing areas in South Africa. Pest Management Science 70, 651–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manrakhan, A, Venter, JH and Hattingh, V (2015) The progressive invasion of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South Africa. Biological Invasions 17, 2803–2809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwatawala, MW, White, IM, Maerere, AP, Senkondo, FJ and De Meyer, M (2004) A new invasive Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Tanzania. African Entomology 12, 154.Google Scholar
Mwatawala, MW, De Meyer, M, Makundi, RH and Maerere, AP (2006) Seasonality and host utilization of the invasive fruit fly, Bactrocera invadens (Dipt., Tephritidae) in central Tanzania. Journal of Applied Entomology 130, 530–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwatawala, MW, De Meyer, M, Makundi, RH and Maerere, AP (2009) Host range and distribution of fruit-infesting pestiferous fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) in selected areas of Central Tanzania. Bulletin of Entomological Research 99, 629–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestel, D, Tolmasky, D, Rabossi, A and Quesada-Allué, LA (2003) Lipid, carbohydrates and protein patterns during metamorphosis of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 96, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovruski, S, Schliserman, P and Aluja, M (2003) Native and introduced host plants of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Northwestern Argentina. Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 1108–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, NT, Carey, JR, Katsoyannos, BI and Kouloussis, NA (1996) Overwintering of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in northern Greece. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89, 526–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, NT, Katsoyannos, BI and Carey, JR (2002) Demographic parameters of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) reared in apples. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95, 564–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pianka, ER (1970) On r-and K-selection. The American Naturalist 104, 592–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieterse, W, Terblanche, JS and Addison, P (2017) Do thermal tolerances and rapid thermal responses contribute to the invasion potential of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)? Journal of Insect Physiology 98, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, PW (1984) Insect Ecology. 2nd Edn.New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Prokopy, RJ, Roitberg, BD and Vargas, RI (1994) Effects of egg load on finding and acceptance of host fruit in Ceratitis capitata flies. Physiological Entomology 19, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radonjić, S, Čizmović, M and Pereira, R (2013) Population dynamics of the Mediterranean fruit fly in Montenegro. International Journal of Insect Science 5, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, K and Chesson, P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, 170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sol, D, Bartomeus, I and Griffin, AS (2012) The paradox of invasion in birds: competitive superiority or ecological opportunism? Oecologia 169, 553–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakai, AK, Allendorf, FW, Holt, JS, Lodge, DM, Molofsky, J, With, KA, Baughman, S, Cabin, RJ, Cohen, JE, Ellstrand, NC and McCauley, DE (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32(1), 305–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theron, CD, Manrakhan, A and Weldon, CW (2017) Host use of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), in South Africa. Journal of Applied Entomology 141, 810–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research (2018) National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference Release 28. Available at https://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/2279?fgcd=&manu=&lfacet=&format=&count=&max=50&offset=&sort=default&order=asc&qlookup=nectarine+raw&ds=&qt=&qp=&qa=&qn=&q=&ing= (Accessed 5 March 2018).Google Scholar
Vargas, RI and Carey, JR (1989) Comparison of demographic parameters for wild and laboratory-adapted Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 82, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, RI, Stark, JD, Kido, MH, Ketter, HM and Whitehand, LC (2000) Methyl eugenol and cue-lure traps for suppression of male oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii: effects of lure mixtures and weathering. Journal of Economic Entomology 93, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vargas, RI, Leblanc, L, Putoa, R and Eitam, A (2007) Impact of introduction of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) and classical biological control releases of Fopius arisanus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on economically important fruit flies in French Polynesia. Journal of Economic Entomology 100, 670–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, TF (1964) Influence of host plant condition on population increase of Tetranychus telarius (Linnaeus) (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Hilgardia 35, 237–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, IM and Elson-Harris, MM (1992) Fruit Flies of Economic Significance: Their Identification and Bionomics. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Ye, H and Liu, JH (2005) Population dynamics of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) in the Kunming area, southwestern China. Insect Science 12, 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar