Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:56:35.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The biology of the tree-hole breeding mosquito Aedes geniculatus (Olivier) (Diptera: Culicidae) in southern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. G. Yates
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood Experimental Station, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, PE17 2LS, UK.

Abstract

The biology of Aedes geniculatus (O1.) was studied in 1967–73 in Monks Wood National Nature Reserve, an oak-ash woodland, in southern England. Adult emergence from tree-holes occurred from May to September, and the sex ratio was approximately 1:1. Catches on man indicated that the maximum biting densities occurred in July and August and that females spend about two minutes obtaining a blood-meal. Significant positive correlations were found between their unfed weight and the weight of the blood-meal and also between female wing length and fecundity. The mean number of eggs per batch was 70. Studies with bamboo pots used as artificial oviposition sites in the field showed that the seasonal peak in oviposition spanned July and August, daily ovipositional activity was greatest in mid-afternoon and evening and ovipositing females preferred oviposition sites positioned within 4 m of the ground. A small proportion of eggs hatched during the summer in which they were laid, but most hatched in the following spring. Continuous or intermittent soaking failed to induce hatching until this time. In 'the laboratory, partially em'bryonated eggs required a minimum relative humidity of 88% to develop fully, but some embryonated eggs survived at 58%. Some eggs survived for 18–24 months in the field. The sampling of preadult stages dn tree-holes showed that larvae in the first two instars occurred almost throughout the year while third- and fourth-instar larvae were present in spring and summer. Pupae occurred only in the summer. It was concluded that A. geniculatus is univoltine in Monks Wood.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boorman, J. P. T. (1960). Observations on the feeding habits of the mosquito Aëdes(Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus): the loss of fluid after a blood-meal and the amount of blood taken during feeding. — Ann trop Med Parasit. 54, 814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. W. A. (1954). Studies on the responses of the female Aëdes mosquito. Part VI.—The attractiveness of coloured cloths to Canadian species.—Bull ent Res. 45, 6778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callot, J. (1939). Sur quelques gîtes et associations larvaires de moustiques.—Annls Parasit hum comp. 17, 8687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christophers, S. R. (1960). Aedes aegypti (L.). The yellow fever mosquito. Its life history, bionomics and structure.—739 pp. London, Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Corbet, P. S. (1966). Diel patterns of mosquito activity in a high arctic locality: hazen camp, ellesmere island, n.w.t.—Can Ent. 98, 12381252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, J. P. (1975). Animal population ecology.—155 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Elton, C. S. & Miller, R. S. (1954). The ecological survey of animal communities: with a practical system of classsifying habitats by structural characters.—J Ecol. 42, 46092–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillett, J. D. (1971). Mosquitos.—274 pp. London, Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Gillett, J. D., Roman, E. A. & Phillips, V. (1977). Erratic hatching in Aedes eggs: a new interpretation.— Proc R Soc B. 196, 223232.Google ScholarPubMed
Gjullin, C. M., Hegarty, C. P. & Bollen, W. B. (1941). The necessity of a low oxygen concentration for the hatching of Aedes mosquito eggs. — J cell comp Physiol. 17, 193—202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Cova, C. (1977). Ecological studies on container-breeding mosquitoes Aedes geniculatus(Olivier) and Aedes aegypti (L.).— Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. London.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. M. & Crew, W. (1948). The mechanisms by which mosquitoes and tsetse-fliesobtain their blood-meal, the histology of the lesions produced, and the subsequent reactions of the mammalian host; together with some observations on the feeding of Chrysops and Cimex.—Ann trop Med Parasit. 42, 334356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, R. M. & Lumsden, W. H. R. (1939). A study of the behaviour of the mouth-parts of mosquitoes when taking up blood from living tissue; together with some observations on the ingestion of micronlariae.—Ann trop Med Parasit. 33, 259—278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R. B. & Gordon, R. M. (1952). An apparatus which enables the process of feeding by mosquitoes to be observed in the tissue of a live rodent; together with an account of the ejection of saliva and its significance in malaria.—Ann trop Med Parasit. 46, 311319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddow, A. J. (1960). Studies on the biting habits and medical importance of East African mosquitos in the genus Aëdes. I. Subgenera Aëdimorphus, Banksinella and Dunnius.—Bull ent Res. 50, 759779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harold, C. H. H. (1926). Studies on mosquito bionomics.—Jl R. Army med Cps. 47, 8194.Google Scholar
Horsfall, W. R. (1955). Mosquitoes: their bionomics and relation to disease.—723 pp. New York, Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
Kitching, R. L. (1969). The fauna of tree-holes in relation to environmental factors. — Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kitching, R. L. (1971). An ecological study of water-filled tree-holes and their position in the woodland ecosystem.—j Anim Ecol. 40, 281302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhani, K. H. & Service, M. W. (1974). Estimated mortalities of the immature stages of Aedes cantans (Mg.) (Diptera, Culicidae) in a natural habitat. — Bull ent Res. 64, 265276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, W. D. (1920). A handbook of British osquitoes.—125 pp. London, British Museum(Natural History).Google Scholar
Loor, K. A. & Defoliart, G. R. (1969). An oviposition trap for detecting the presence of Aedes triseriatus (Say).—Mosquito News 29, 487488.Google Scholar
Loor, K. A. & Defoliart, G. R. (1970). Field observations on the biology of Aedes triseriatus.—Mosquito News 30, 6064.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. F. (1938). The British mosquitoes.—341 pp. London, British Museum(NaturalHistory).Google Scholar
Mellanby, K. (1946). Man's reaction to mosquito bites. — Nature, Lond. 158, 554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natvig, L. R. (1948). Contributions to the knowledge of the Danish and Fennoscandian mosquitoes. Culicini.—Norsk, ent Tidsskr. (Suppl.) 1, 1567.Google Scholar
O'Gower, A. K. (1955). The influence of the physical properties of a water container surface upon its selection by the gravid females of Aëdes scutellaris scutellaris (Walker) for oviposition (Diptera, Culicidae). — Proc Linn Soc N.S.W. 79, 211218.Google Scholar
O'Gower, A. K. (1957a). The influence of the surface on oviposition by Aëdes aegypti (Linn.)(Diptera, Culicidae).—Proc Linn Soc N.S.W. 82, 240244.Google Scholar
O'Gower, A. K. (1957b). The influence of the surface on oviposition by Aëdes albopictus (Skuse) and Aëdes scutellaris katherinensis Woodhill (Diptera, Culicidae). — Proc Linn Soc N.S.W. 82, 285288.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, F. J. (1956). Observations on pool and capillary feeding in Aedes aegypti (L.).—Nature, Lond. 177, 10871088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qutubuddin, M. (1953). The emergence and sex ratio of Culex fatigans Wied. (Diptera, Culicidae) in laboratory experiments.—Bull ent Res. 43, 549565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rettich, F. (1973). A study on the mosquitoes (Diptera, Culicinae) of the PodSbrady area (Czechoslovakia). — Ada Univ Carol, Biologica no. 5, 359378.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E., Colasbelcour, J. & Stefanopoulo, G. J.(1937). Transmission de la fievre jaune par un moustique paléarctique répandu dans la région parisienne, l'Aedes geniculatus Oliv.—C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris. 205, 182183.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E., Lepine, P., Treillard, M. & Sauter, V. (1941). Infection expérimentale de culicides (Aedines) européens avec le virus de l'encéphalomyélite équine américaine, type Venezuela. — Bull Soc Path exot. 34, 130133 (not seen in original, cited by Horsfall, 1955).Google Scholar
Scholl, P. J. & Defoliart, G. R. (1977). Aedes triseriatus and Aedes hendersoni: vertical and temporal distribution as measured by viposition.—Environ. Entomol. 6, 355358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1968). Observations on feeding and oviposition in some British mosquitoes.—Entomologia exp appl. 11, 277285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1971a). The daytime distribution of mosquitoes resting in vegetation.—J med Ent. 8, 271278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1971b). Flight periodicities and vertical distribution of Aedes cantons (Mg.), Ae. geniculatus (O1.), Anopheles plumbeus Steph. and Culex pipiens L. (Dipt., Culicidae) in southern EnglandBull ent Res. 60, 639651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1971c). A reappraisal of the role of mosquitoes in the transmission of myxomatosis in Britain.—j Hyg, Camb. 69, 105111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1971d). Feeding behaviour and host preferences of British mosquitoes.—Bull ent Res. 60, 653661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1973a). Study of the natural predators of Aedes cantons (Meigen) using the precipitin test.—j med Ent. 10, 503510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1973b). The biology of Anopheles claviger (Mg.) (Dipt., Culicidae) insouthern England.—Bull ent Res. 63, 347359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, M. W. (1974). Further results of catches of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and mosquitoes from suction traps.—J med Ent. 11, 471479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Service, M. W. (1977). Ecological and biological studies on Aedes cantons (Meig.) (Diptera:Culicidae) in southern England.—j appl Ecol. 14, 159196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teesdale, C. (1955). Studies on the bionomics of Aëdes aegypti (L.) in its natural habitats in a coastal region of Kenya.—Bull ent Res. 46, 711742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trpis, M., Haufe, W. O. & Shemanchuk, J. A. (1973). Embryonic development of Aedes (O.) sticticus (Diptera: Culicidae) in relation to differentconstant temperatures.—Can Ent. 105, 4350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D. M., Morris, C. D., Wright, R. E., Defoliart, G. R. & Hanson, R. P. (1972). Transmission of La Crosse virus (California encephalitis group) by the mosquito Aedes triseriatus.—J med Ent. 9, 125127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesenberg-Lund, C. (1920–21). Contributions to the biology of the Danish Culicidae. — Kl danske Vidensk Selsk Skr. (8) 7 (1), 210 pp.Google Scholar
Wilton, D. P. (1968). Oviposition site selection by the tree-hole mosquito, Aedes triseriatus(Say).—J med Ent. 5, 189194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yates, M. (1974a). An emergence trap for sampling adult tree-hole mosquitoes.—Entomologist's mon Mag. 109, 99101.Google Scholar
Yates, M. G. (1974b). An artificial oviposition site for tree-hole breeding mosquitoes. — Entomologist's Gat. 25, 151154.Google Scholar
Zavortink, T. J. (1972). Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culicidae). XXVIII. The New World species formerly placed in Aedes (Finlaya). — Contrib Am Entomol Inst. 8 (3), 206 pp.Google Scholar