Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:01:59.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aphidophagous Cecidomyiidae (Diptera): taxonomy, biology and assessments of field populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. M. Harris
K. M. Harris
Affiliation:
Royal Horticultural Society's Garden, Wisley, Ripley, Woking, Surrey, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Larvae of Aphidoletes Kieffer and Monobremia Kieffer feed exclusively as predators on aphids. The taxonomic status of these genera and their included species is reviewed and new generic and specific synonymies are given. A. aphidimyza (Rondani), A. urticariae (Kieffer), A. abietis (Kieffer), A. thompsoni Möhn and M. subterranea (Kieffer) are accepted as good species and a neotype is designated for A. urticariae. Diagnostic characters of these species are indicated and characters of the male genitalia, female wings and larval skins are illustrated. Published information on their biology, particularly of the commonest species A. aphidimyza, is summarized and includes details of host ranges and geographical distribution. Lestodiplosis grassator (Fyles), L. pini Barnes, Trilobia aphidisuga Del Guercio, Uncinulella eriosomiperda Del Guercio, Trilobiella siphae Del Guercio and Adelgimyza strobilobii Del Guercio probably prey on aphids but have not been recognized since they were originally described. Comparative assessments of field populations of Aphidoletes by examination of aphid colonies in the field, by incubation of samples in polythene bags and by laboratory examination of samples fixed in 70% ethyl alcohol showed that only the last gives accurate counts of eggs and larvae. Counts of aphids, Aphidoletes, Syrphids, Coccinellids and Anthocorids in 35 samples taken from aphid colonies occurring at Wisley in 1970–72 are tabulated, together with seven samples from other localities. Aphidoletes (mainly A. aphidimyza) was numerically the dominant predator in all three years at Wisley and was about ten times more numerous on wild plants than on cultivated plants.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , December 1973 , pp. 305 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azab, A. K., Tawfik, M. F. S. & Ismail, I. I. (1966a). Seasonal changes in the abundance of certain aphids and their predators in Giza. — Bull. Soc. ent. Égypte 49, 11–24.Google Scholar
Azab, A. K., Tawfik, M. F. S. & Ismail, I. I. (1966b). Morphology and biology of the aphidophagous midge, Phenobremia aphidivora Rübsaamen (Diptera: Cecidomyidae). — Bull. Soc. ent. Égypte 49, 25–45.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1927a). Four British aphid-eating gall-midges. — Entomologist 60, 174–180.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1927b). British gall-midges. I. — Entomologist's mon. Mag. 63, 164–172, 211–221.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1928). British gall-midges. II. Lestodiplosis Kieffer. — Entomologist's mon. Mag. 64, 68–75, 142–148.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1929). Gall midges (Dipt., Cecidomyidae) as enemies of aphids. — Bull. ent. Res. 20, 433–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1954). Gall-midge larvae as endoparasites, including the description of a species parasitising aphids in Trinidad, B.W.I. — Bull. ent. Res. 45, 769–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bombosch, S. (1958). Die Ursache eines eigenartigen Blattlaussterbens. — Z. PflKrankh. PflPath. PflSchutz 65, 694–695.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D. W. (1900). Two new cecidomyians destructive to buds of roses. — Bull. Bur. Ent. U.S. Dep. Agric. 22, 44–48.Google Scholar
Davis, J. J. (1916). Aphidoletes meridionalis an important dipterous enemy of aphids. — J. agric. Res. 6, 883–888.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1918a). Il moscerino dell' Aphis symphyti Schr. (Rondaniella bezzii n.g., n.sp.). — Agricoltura Colon. 12, 375–390.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1918b). Il moscerino della Toxoptera degli agrumi (Rondaniella toxopterae sp. n.). — Agricoltura Colon. 12, 391–395.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1919a). Il moscerino del Phorodon del luppolo (Rondaniella phorodontis sp. n.). — Agricoltura Colon. 13, 31–32.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1919b). Il moscerino del Macrosiphon del carciofo (Rondaniella macrosiphonis sp. n.). — Agricoltura Colon. 13, 33–35.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1919c). Il moscerino della Macrosiphoniella del crisantemo (Rondaniella macrosiphoniellae sp. n.). — Agricoltura Colon. 13, 36–37.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1919d). Il moscerino dell' afide del cotogno ornamentale (Rondaniella ornata sp. n.). — Agricoltura Colon. 13, 38–40.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1919e). Moscerino della Toxoptera dell' alaterno (Rondaniella cucullata sp. n.). — Agricoltura Colon. 13, 41–45.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1919f). Il moscerino dell' afide del papavero (Trilobia aphidisuga n.g., n.sp.). — Agricoltura Colon. 13, 46–49.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1919g). Il moscerino dell' afide lanigero (Uncinulella eriosomiperda n.g., n.sp.). — Agricoltura Colon. 13, 50–53.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1919h). Il moscerino degli Adelges dell' abeto (Adelgimyza strobilobii n.g., n.sp.). — Agricoltura Colon. 13, 54–59.Google Scholar
Del Guercio, G. (1919i). Il moscerino della Sipha del granturco (Trilobiella siphae n.g., n.sp.). — Agricoltura Colon. 13, 181–183.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. A. (1949). The parasites and predators of potato aphids. — Bull. ent. Res. 40, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felt, E. P. (1907). New species of Cecidomyiidae. — Bull. N. Y. St. Mus. 110, 97–165.Google Scholar
Felt, E. P. (1908). New species of Cecidomyiidae. II. — Bull. N. Y. St. Mus. 124, 286–422.Google Scholar
Felt, E. P. (1912). Studies in Itonididae. — Jl N. Y. ent. Soc. 20, 236–248.Google Scholar
Franz, J. (1955). Tannenstammläuse (Adelges piceae Ratz.) unter einer Pilzdecke von Cucurbitaria pithyophila (Kze. et Schm.) De Not., nebst Beobachtungen an Aphidoletes thompsoni Möhn (Dipt., Itonididae) und Rabocerus mutilatus Beck (Col., Pythidae) als Tannenlausfeinde. — Z. PflKrankh. PflPath. PflSchutz. 62, 49–61.Google Scholar
Fyles, T. W. (1883). Description of a dipterous parasite of Phylloxera vastatrix. Diplosis? grassator n.s. — Can. Ent. 14, 237–239.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. J. (1971). The genus Aphidoletes Kieffer (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in North America. — Ent. News 82, 177–181.Google Scholar
Gagné, R. J. (1973). A generic synopsis of the Nearctic Cecidomyiidi (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae: Cecidomyiinae). — Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 66, 857–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, K. S. (1957). Preliminary investigations on the biology and ecology of the parasites and predators of Brevicoryne brassicae (L.). — Bull. ent. Res. 48, 619–629.Google Scholar
Harris, K. M. (1966). Gall midge genera of economic importance (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Part 1: Introduction and subfamily Cecidomyiinae; supertribe Cecidomyiidi. — Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 118, 313–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenbach, J. H. (1858). Die deutschen Phytophagen aus der Klasse der Insekten. — Verh. naturh. Ver. preuss. Rheinl. 15, 77–210.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1895). Observations sur les ornements des antennes des Cécidomyies. — Feuille jeun. Nat. 26, 7–10.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1896). Observations sur les Diplosis, et diagnoses de cinq espèces nouvelles (Dipt.) (Bremia, Endaphis et Macrodiplosis). — Bull. Soc. ent. Fr. 1896, 382–384.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1898). Synopse des Cécidomyies d'Europe et d'Algérie décrites jusqu'à ce jour. — Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Metz 20, 1–64.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1901). Description de quelques Cécidomyies nouvelles. — Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Metz 21, 167–174.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1904). Nouvelles Cécidomyies xylophiles. — Annls Soc. scient. Brux. 28, 385–388.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1908). Zwei neue Cecidomyiden aus Russland. — Russk. ent. Obozr. 7, 200–202.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1912). Neue Gallmücken—Gattungen. — 2 pp. France, Bitsch.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1913a). Diptera. Fam. Cecidomyidae. — Genera Insect. 152, 1–346.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1913b). Glanures diptérologiques. — Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Metz 28, 45–55.Google Scholar
Lintner, J. A. (1896). Eleventh report on the injurious and other insects of the State of New York, for the year 1895. — Rep. St. Ent. N. Y. 85–326.Google Scholar
Loew, H. (1850). Dipterologische Beiträge. Vierter Theil. — 40 pp. Posen.Google Scholar
Mamaev, B. M. & Krivosheina, N. P. (1965). Larvae of gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae): comparative morphology, biology and identification tables [in Russian]. — 278 pp. Moscow, Izdatelstvo Nauka.Google Scholar
Mamayeva, K. P. (1964). Gall midges (Diptera, Itonididae) which develop in aphid colonies. — Ent. Rev. Wash. 43, 229–233.Google Scholar
Marikovskiĭ, P. I. (1956). New gall midges (Diptera, Itonididae) from the U.S.S.R. — Ént. Obozr. 35, 184–195.Google Scholar
Milne, D. L. (1960). The gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyidae) of clover flower-heads. — Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 112, 73–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. G. & Wright, K. H. (1967). Foreign predator introductions for control of the balsam woolly aphid in the Pacific Northwest. — J. econ. Ent. 60, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möhn, E. (1954). Eine neue zoophage Gallmücken-Art an Tannenläusen. — Z. angew. Ent. 36, 462–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijveldt, W. (1952). Over de levenswijze van Phaenobremia urticariae Kffr. (Diptera, Itonididae) f.n.sp. — Ent. Ber., Amst. 14, 8–13, 23–29.Google Scholar
Nijveldt, W. (1953). Phaenobremia aphidiphora Rübs (Diptera, Itonididae) f.n.sp., een predator van Aphis frangulae Kltb. — Ent. Ber., Amst. 14, 193–195.Google Scholar
Nijveldt, W. (1954). The range of prey of Phaenobremia urticariae Kffr. and Ph. aphidivora Rübs. (Diptera, Itonididae). – Ent. Ber., Amst. 15, 207–211.Google Scholar
Nijveldt, W. (1955). Additional notes on my paper on the range of prey of Phaenobremia aphidivora Kffr. and Ph. urticariae Rübs. (Diptera, Itonididae). — Ent. Ber., Amst. 15, 436–437.Google Scholar
Nijveldt, W. (1957). Aphid-eating gall midges (Cecidomyidae), with special reference to those in the Barnes collection. — Ent. Ber., Amst. 17, 233–239.Google Scholar
Nijveldt, W. (1966). The food necessity of Phaenobremia aphidimyza (Rond., Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). — Cecidol. indica 1, 185–187.Google Scholar
Nijveldt, W. (1969). Gall midges of economic importance. Vol. VIII: Gall midges — Miscellaneous. — 221 pp. London, Crosby Lockwood.Google Scholar
Pollard, E. (1969). The effect of removal of arthropod predators on an infestation of Brevicoryne brassicae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) on Brussels sprouts. — Entomologia exp. appl. 12, 118–124.Google Scholar
Pritchard, A. E. (1961). Phaenobremia doutti, a new gall midge predator of aphids in California (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). — Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 63, 100–101.Google Scholar
Roberti, D. (1946). La Phenobremia aphidimyza (Rond.) (Diptera: Cecidomyidae) predatrice di Aphis (Doralis) frangulae Koch. — Boll. Ist. Ent. Univ. Bologna 15, 233–256.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. (1847). Osservazioni sopra parecchie specie di esapodi Afidicidi e sui loro nemeci. — Nouvi Ann. Sci. nat. Bologna 8, 337–351, 432–448.Google Scholar
Rübsaamen, E. H. (1891). Ueber Gallmücken aus zoophagen Larven. — Wien. ent. Ztg. 10, 6–16.Google Scholar
Skuse, F. A. A. (1888). Diptera of Australia. Part I. [Cecidomyiidae]. — Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 3, 17–145.Google Scholar
Smith, B. D. (1966). Effects of parasites and predators on a natural population of the aphid Acyrthosiphon spartii (Koch) on broom (Sarothamnus scoparius L.). — J. Anim Ecol. 35, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solinas, M. (1968). Morfologia anatomia e organizzazione funzionale del capo della larva matura di Phaenobremia aphidimyza (Rondani). — Entomologica Bari 4, 1–44.Google Scholar
Tölg, F. (1921). Beschreibung neuer Cecidomyiden aus der Wiener Gegend. — Neue Beitr. syst. Insektenk. 2, 33–35.Google Scholar
Uygun, N. (1971). Der Einfluss der Nahrungsmenge auf Fruchtbarkeit und Lebensdauer von Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rond.) (Diptera: Itonididae). — Z. angew. Ent. 69, 234–258.Google Scholar
Voukassovitch, P. (1925). Observations biologiques sur un Diptère, Isobremia kiefferi n. sp. parasite des pucerons. — C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 92, 357–359.Google Scholar
Wilson, F. (1938). Notes on the insect enemies of Chermes with particular reference to Pineus pini Koch and P. strobi Hartig. — Bull. ent. Res. 29, 373–389.Google Scholar
Wood-Baker, C. S. (1965). Aphidivorous Cecidomyiidae (Dipt.) an investigation of the occurrence and bionomics of aphid-eating gall-midges, mainly in Britain. — Entomologist's mon. Mag. 100, 212–231.Google Scholar
Yukawa, J. (1971). A revision of the Japanese gall midges (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). — Mem. Fac. Agric. Kagoshima Univ. 8, 1–203.Google Scholar