Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:20:34.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ant – homopteran interactions in a tropical ecosystem. Description of an experiment on cocoa in Ghana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

M. Bigger*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham, Kent, UK
*
M. Bigger, Natural Resources Institute, Central Avenue, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK.

Abstract

Over a period of six years, the presence or absence of 23 species of arboreal insects (13 Homoptera, 1 Heteroptera, 9 ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)) was recorded on each of 866 young Amazon and Amazon hybrid cocoa trees at the Cocoa Research Institute, Tafo, Ghana. The general form of the time-series, derived from the proportion of trees occupied by each species, is described. Analysis of 18 of these series, taken either singly or jointly, was carried out using analysis of variance and principal components analysis and the degree of spatial association between 16 of the species was also investigated. For the latter, the number of joint occurrences of pairs of species was compared with the expected number by means of a chi squared test. An index of association was derived from the proportion of occasions on which the difference was significant. For all but four species, there were highly significant differences between annual means in the analysis of variance and, in many, the overall annual trend was downward with time. For those species where significant differences were not shown between years, trends were often apparent on individual plots but were negated because of inconsistencies between plots in the direction of the trend. In the joint analysis of all 18 species by principal components, the first component accounted for approximately 33% of the total variance and could be identified as representing to a large extent the long-term upward or downward trends shown up by the analysis of variance. The second principal component, accounting for a further 13% of total variance, was interpreted as being a further manifestation of the long-term trend, representing a tendency for deviation from the trend line shown up by the first component to become less with time and to approach the trend line in a damped oscillation. This is thought to be partly caused by a drought at the start of the experiment which affected certain species adversely. The third principal component accounted for 11% of total variance and the scores followed an irregular annual cycle which was related to relative humidity. The scores on this axis were high during dry periods of the year and low during wet periods. In the analysis of variance it was found that 13 species showed significant differences in spatial distribution between seasons and, for most, there was evidence for an annual cycle. There was also some evidence of correlation between the seasonal cycles of some insects with seasonal rainfall level or morning or afternoon relative humidity. These same species are important in contributing to the third principal component scores. Spatial association analysis showed eight species to be strongly associated. These fell into three groups with positive associations between members of the same group and negative association between members of other groups. Each group featured an ant-homopteran association, Crematogaster spp. with Planococcoides njalensis (Laing) in group 1, Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) with Stictococcus spp. in group 2, and Camponotus spp. and Polyrhachis laboriosa F. Smith with Planococcus citri (Risso) and Toxoptera aurantii Boyer de Fonscolombe in group 3. Three other coccids were loosely linked to these groups through particular members, Waxiella sp. nr zonatus (Newstead) to group 1 through Planococcoides njalensis and to group 2 through Camponotus spp. and Phenacoccus hargreavesi (Laing) and Steatococcus spp. to group 2 through Planococcus citri. Changes taking place with time in the relative abundance of members of these groups could be discerned in the trajectories of the first two principal components. The spatial re-arrangements taking place with time of the territories of the major ant species are followed in some detail, and the effect of these changes on Homoptera is discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adomako, D. (1972) Studies on mealybug (Planococcoides njalensis (Laing)) nutrition: a comparative analysis for the free carbohydrate and nitrogenous compounds in cocoa bark and mealybug honeydew. Bulletin of Entomological Research 61, 523531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigger, M. (1975) Susceptibility of two cocoa progenies to attack by insect species. I—Proportion of trees infested. Experimental Agriculture 11, 187192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigger, M. (1976a) Oscillations of tropical insect populations. Nature, London 259, 207209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigger, M. (1976b) Virus outbreak survey. Annual Report of the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, 1973–74, pp. 101107.Google Scholar
Bigger, M. (1981a) Observations on the insect fauna of shaded and unshaded Amelonado cocoa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 71, 107119.Google Scholar
Bigger, M. (1981b) The relative abundance of the mealybug vectors of cocoa swollen shoot disease in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 71, 435448.Google Scholar
Bigger, M. (1993) Time series analysis of variation in abundance of selected cocoa insects and fitting of simple linear predictive models. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 83, 153169.Google Scholar
Campbell, C.A.M. (1983) The assessment of mealybugs and other Homoptera on mature cocoa trees in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 73, 137151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C. A. M. (1984) The influence of overhead shade and fertilizers on the Homoptera of mature Upper-Amazon cocoa trees in Ghana. Bulletin of Entomological Research 74, 163174.Google Scholar
Cornwell, P. B. (1958) Movements of the vectors of virus diseases of cacao in Ghana. I—Canopy movement in and between trees. Bulletin of Entomological Research 49, 613630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entwistle, P. F. (1959) Annual Report of the West African Cocoa Research Institute 1958–1959, 3032.Google Scholar
Entwistle, P. F. (1972) Pests of cocoa. 779 pp. London, Longmans.Google Scholar
Fennah, R. G. (1959) Nutritional factors associated with the development of mealybugs on cocoa. Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, Trididad. Report on Cocoa Research 1957–1958, 1828.Google Scholar
Firempong, S. (1976) Biology of Crematogaster clariventris. Annual Report of the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, 1973–74, 142145.Google Scholar
Gibbs, D. G. & Leston, D. (1970) Insect phenology in a forest cocoa farm locality in West Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology 7, 519548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1962) The ecological approach to cocoa disease and health. pp. 348352 in Wills, J. B. (Ed.) Agriculture and land use in Ghana. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Legg, J. T. (1981) The cocoa swollen-shoot research project at the Cocoa Research Institute, Tafo, Ghana 1969–1978. Technical report Volume 4, Section 6. 199 pp. London, Overseas Development Administration. 199 pp.Google Scholar
Leston, D. (1973) The ant mosaic—tropical tree crops and the limiting of pests and diseases. PANS 19, 311341.Google Scholar
Majer, J. D. (1972) The ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms. Bulletin of Entomological Research 62, 151160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majer, J. D. (1974) A list of insects and other invertebrates associated with cocoa (Theobroma cacao) in a Ghana cocoa farm. Proceedings of the 4th Conference of West African Cocoa Entomologists,Accra, 1974,89101.Google Scholar
Majer, J. D. (1976a) The maintainance of the ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms. Journal of Applied Ecology 13, 123144.Google Scholar
Majer, J. D. (1976b) The ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms: further structural considerations. Journal of Applied Ecology 13, 145155.Google Scholar
Majer, J. D. (1976c) The influence of ants and ant manipulation on the cocoa farm fauna. Journal of Applied Ecology 13, 157175.Google Scholar
Marchart, H. & Leston, D. (1968) Radioactive tagging experiments. Annual Report of the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana, 1965–66, pp. 5254.Google Scholar
Room, P. M. (1971) The relative distributions of ant species in Ghana's cocoa farms. Journal of Animal Ecology 40, 735751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seal, H. (1964) Multivariate statistical analysis for biologists. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Strickland, A. H. (1951a) The entomology of swollen shoot of cocoa. I.—The insect species involved, with notes on their biology. Bulletin of Entomological Research 41, 725748.Google Scholar
Strickland, A. H. (1951b) The entomology of swollen shoot of cocoa. II.—The bionomics and ecology of the species involved. Bulletin of Entomological Research 42, 65103.Google Scholar
Taylor, B. (1977) The ant mosaic on cocoa and other tree crops in western Nigeria. Ecological Entomology 2, 245255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, B. & Adedoyin, S. F. (1978) The abundance of inter-specific relations of common ant species on cocoa farms in western Nigeria. Bulletin of Entomological Research 68, 105121.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1954) Field observations on the cocoa mirids, Sahlbergella singularis Hagl. and Distantiella theobroma (Dist.) in the Gold Coast. III—Population fluctuations. Bulletin of Entomological Research 45, 723744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar