Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:16:04.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Anopheles barbirostris group (Diptera, Culicidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. A. Reid
J. A. Reid
Affiliation:
Lately Senior Entomologist, Institute for Medical Research, Malaya.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The group of Anopheles barbirostris Wulp is shown to consist of some 11 closely similar species, five of which are described as new. Keys for identification are provided. The group is divisible into two parts, the subgroups of A. barbirostris and A. vanus Wlk.

Two (or possibly three) species in the barbirostris subgroup are disease vectors.

A. barbirostris sensu stricto is the commonest and most variable species of the group and has the widest range, occurring probably from India to the Moluccas excluding only Borneo and the Philippines. Larvae can be found in a variety of breeding places in still or slowly moving water. Throughout its range, except perhaps in the Celebes, it appears to be largely zoophilous and not a vector of disease.

A. campestris sp.n. is very closely related to barbirostris. It appears to be confined to the alluvial plains of coasts and deltas, and may be limited to the mainland of Asia. It is common on the west coast of the Malay Peninsula where it is anthropophilous and an important vector of human (and possibly also simian) malaria, and of filariasis due to the periodic form of Brugia malayi. It is probably at least a minor vector of malaria and filariasis in the plains of Thailand.

A. donaldi sp.n. is the principal member of the group in Borneo, and is locally common in Malaya where the larvae are usually found in more shaded places than those of barbirostris. In Borneo it is a minor vector of malaria and filariasis, and possibly in Malaya also.

A. franciscoi sp.n. is the Philippine representative of the barbirostris subgroup.

A. hodgkini sp.n. is widespread (Thailand, Indo-China, Malaya and Borneo), but seldom common. It is a species of the forest and forest edge.

A. pollicaris sp.n. is an uncommon but easily recognised forest species only known at present from Malaya.

The vanus subgroup consists for the most part of uncommon species having little contact with man and usually associated with forest. A. vanus sensu stricto occurs in the Celebes and Moluccas where it is common, and also in Borneo and the Philippines; A. barbumbrosus Strickl. & Chowd., replaces vanus in the western half of the archipelago and on the mainland; A. ahomi Chowd., is known from Assam; A. manalangi Mendoza is confined to the Philippines; finally there is an unnamed species in Ceylon with speckled legs which was previously identified wrongly as A. pseudobarbirostris Ludl.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , May 1962 , pp. 1 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

D'abrera, V. St. E. (1944). The eggs of the Ceylon Anopheline mosquitoes.—J. Malar. Inst. India 5 pp. 337–359.Google Scholar
Baisas, F. E. (1931). The barbirostris—hyrcanus group of the Philippine. Anopheles.—Philipp. J. Sci. 44 pp. 425–448.Google Scholar
Bates, M. & Hackett, L. W. (1939). The distinguishing characteristics of the populations of Anopheles maculipennis found in southern Europe.—Verh. VII. int. Congr. Ent. 1938 3 pp. 1555–1569.Google Scholar
Bonne-Wepster, J. & Swellengrebel, N. H. (1953). The Anopheline mosquitoes of the Indo-Australian region.—504 pp. Amsterdam, de Bussy.Google Scholar
Bruce-Chwatt, L. J. & Göckel, C. W. (1960). A study of the blood-feeding patterns of Anopheles mosquitos through precipitin tests.—Bull. World Hlth Org. 22 pp. 685–720.Google Scholar
Brug, S. L. (1925). Aanteekeningen omtrent muskieten (III).—Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Ind. 65 pp. 661–671.Google Scholar
Brug, S. L. (1937). De overbrenging van Filaria malayi te Kalawara (o. a. Paloe, Res. Menado).—Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Ind. 77 pp. 1462–1470.Google Scholar
Brug, S. L. (1938). Filaria bancrofti—overbrengers op Kabaena.—Meded. Dienst. Volksgezondh. Ned.-Ind. 27 pp. 88–97.Google Scholar
Cain, A. J. (1954). Animal species and their evolution.—190 pp. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Carter, H. F. (1925). —The Anopheline mosquitoes of Ceylon. Part I. The differential characters of the adults and larvae.—Ceylon J. Sci. (D) 1 pp. 57–97.Google Scholar
Carter, H. F. (1950). Ceylon mosquitoes: lists of species and names of mosquitoes recorded from Ceylon.—Ceylon J. Sci. (B) 24 pp. 85–115.Google Scholar
Chow, C. Y. (1949). The identification and distribution of Chinese Anopheline mosquitoes.—J. nat. Malar. Soc. 8 pp. 121–131.Google ScholarPubMed
Chow, C. Y., Ibnoe, R. M. & Josopoero, S. T. (1960). Bionomics of Anopheline mosquitos in inland areas of Java, with special reference to Anopheles aconitus Döon.—Bull. ent. Res. 50 pp. 647–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, K. L. (1929). A new variety of Protanopheline A. barbirostris van der Wulp, var. ahomi, found in upper Assam.—Indian J. med. Res. 16 pp. 986–988.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. (1933). The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Diptera. Vol IV. Family Culicidae. Tribe Anophelini.—371 pp. London, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Colless, D. H. (1948). The Anopheline mosquitoes of north-west Borneo.—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 73 pp. 71–119.Google Scholar
Covell, G. (1944). Notes on the distribution, breeding places, adult habits and relation to malaria of the Anopheline mosquitoes of India and the Far East.—J. Malar. Inst. India 5 pp. 399–434.Google Scholar
Crawford, R. (1938). Some Anopheline pupae of Malaya with a note on pupal structure.—110 pp. Singapore, Malar, adv. Bd F.M.S.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1950). Evolution in the tropics.—Amer. Scient. 38 pp. 209–221.Google Scholar
Edeson, J. F. B., Wharton, R. H., Wilson, T. & Reid, J. A. (1957). An experiment in the control of rural malaria in Malaya.—Med. J. Malaya 12 pp. 319–347.Google ScholarPubMed
Edwards, F. W. (1932). Diptera, Fam. Culicidae.—Gen. Insect, fasc. 194, 258 pp. Brussels.Google Scholar
Fraga De Azevedo, J., Gândara, A. F. & Ferreira, A. P. (1958). Subsídies para o conhecimento dos mosquitos da tribo Anophelini (Diptera) na Província de Timor.—An. Inst. Med. Trop. 15 pp. 53–70.Google Scholar
Gabaldon, A. (1952). The effect of DDT on the population of Anopheline vectors in Venezuela.—Riv. Parassit. 13 pp. 29–41.Google Scholar
Gater, B. A. R. (1934). Aids to the identification of Anopheline larvae in Malaya.—160 pp. Singapore, Malar, adv. Bd F.M.S.Google Scholar
Gater, B. A. R. (1935). Aids to the identification of Anopheline imagines in Malaya.—242 pp. Singapore, Malar, adv. Bd F.M.S.Google Scholar
Griffith, D. H. S., Maurer, S. P. & Lim, S. C. (1957). Further studies on malaria in Krian with a note on filariasis.—Med. J. Malaya 12 pp. 348–372.Google Scholar
Haga, J. (1924). Aanteekening omtrent muskieten (II).—Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Ind. 64 pp. 815–834.Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. C. (1950). Iets over de Anophelinen fauna van Zuid-Celebes met vermelding van de malaria-overbrengsters in dit gebied.—Med. Maandbl. 3 pp. 379–394.Google Scholar
Ho, C. (1938). On a collection of Anopheline mosquitoes from the island of Hainan.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 32 pp. 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkin, E. P. (1940). The breeding of certain species of Anopheles in saline waters.—Trans. Far-East. Ass. trop. Med. 10th Congr. 2 pp. 839–871.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, E. P. (1950). The Anopheles umbrosus group (Diptera: Culicidae). Part II. Biology and transmission of malaria.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 101 pp. 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkin, E. P. (1956). The transmission of malaria in Malaya.—Stud. Inst. med. Res. Malaya no. 27, 98 pp.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, E. P. & Johnston, R. S. (1935). Malaria at Batu Gajah, Perak: transmitted by Anopheles barbirostris van der Wulp.—Bull. Inst. med. Res. F.M.S. no. 1 of 1935, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Iyengar, M. O. T. & Menon, M. A. U. (1956). The mosquitos of south Thailand.—Bull. ent. Res. 47 pp. 785–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurgens, A. L. (1932). De overbrenging van Filaria malayi in de onderafdeeling Mamoedjoe.—Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Ind. 72 pp. 953–959.Google Scholar
Kariadi, . (1938). Oriënteerend filariaonderzoek te Martapoera (Res. Z/O. Afd. v. Borneo).—Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Ind. 78 pp. 1127–1138.Google Scholar
Knight, K. L. & Chamberlain, R. W. (1948). A new nomenclature for the chaetotaxy of the mosquito pupa, based on a comparative study of the genera (Diptera: Culicidae).—Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash. 15 pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Lamprell, B. A. (1936). A discussion on the infectivity surveys and feeding habits of Anopheline mosquitoes in the Oriental region, with special reference to Assam and northern Bengal.—Rec. Malar. Surv. India 6 pp. 213–231.Google Scholar
Laveran, A. (1902). Sur des Culicides du Cambodge.—C. R. Soc. Biol. 54 pp. 906–908.Google Scholar
Lee, D. J. & Woodhill, A. R. (1944). The Anopheline mosquitoes of the Australasian region.—Monogr. Dep. Zool. Univ. Sydney no. 2, 209 pp.Google Scholar
Mcarthur, J. (1949). The Anopheles of Tambunan, North Borneo.—Bull. ent. Res. 40 pp. 53–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mcarthur, J. (1950). The importance of Borneo Anopheles.—Indian J. Malariol. 4 pp. 391–447.Google ScholarPubMed
Mcclelland, G. A. H. (1960). A preliminary study of the genetics of abdominal colour variations in Aëdes aegypti (L.) (Diptera, Culicidae).—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 54 pp. 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, W. W. & Traub, R. (1960). Malaysian parasites. XXXVII. An introduction to the ecology of the mosquitoes of the lowland Dipterocarp forest of Selangor, Malaya.—Stud. Inst. med. Res. Malaya no. 29 pp. 79–109.Google Scholar
Malaya, . (1951–54, 1957–59). Annual reports of the Institute for Medical Research for 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1956, 1957 and 1958.Google Scholar
Mattingly, P. F. (1957). Genetical aspects of the Aëdes aegypti problem. I. Taxonomy and bionomics.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 51 pp. 392–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, J. B. (1940). New Anopheles of the Myzorhynchus series.—Mon. Bull. Bur. Hlth Philipp. 20 pp. 353–369.Google Scholar
Omori, N. & Noda, H. (1943). On an Anopheline mosquito, Anopheles barbumbrosus, newly found on Taiwan.—Studia, Med. trop. 1 pp. 83–93.Google Scholar
Poynton, J. O. & Hodgkin, E. P. (1938). Endemic filariasis in the Federated Malay States.—Bull. Inst. med. Res. F.M.S. no. 1 of 1938, 67 pp.Google Scholar
Puri, I. M. (1931). Larvae of Anopheline mosquitoes, with full description of those of the Indian species.—Indian med. Res. Mem. no. 21, 228 pp.Google Scholar
Raghavan, N. G. S. (1961). The vectors of human infections by Wuchereria species in endemic areas and their biology.—Bull. World Hlth Org. 24 pp. 177–195.Google ScholarPubMed
Reid, J. A. (1942). A preliminary note on Malayan forms of Anopheles barbirostris.—J. Malaya Br. Brit. med. Ass. 5 pp. 71–72. (Reprinted in Med. J. Malaya 2 pp. 125–127, 1947.)Google Scholar
Reid, J. A. (1947). Type specimens of Culicidae described by Laveran (Diptera: Culicidae).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (B) 16 pp. 86–91.Google Scholar
Reid, J. A. (1950). The Anopheles umbrosus group (Diptera: Culicidae). Part I. Systematics, with descriptions of two new species.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 101 pp. 281–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. A. (1953a). The Anopheles hyrcanus group in south-east Asia (Diptera: Culicidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 44 pp. 5–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. A. (1953b). Transmission of filariasis.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 47 p. 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. A. (1961). The attraction of mosquitos by human or animal baits in relation to the transmission of disease.—Bull. ent. Res. 52 pp. 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. A. & Knight, K. L. (1961). Classification within the subgenus Anopheles (Diptera, Culicidae).—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 55 pp. 474–488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, J. A. & Weitz, B. (1961). Anopheline mosquitoes as vectors of animal malaria in Malaya.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 55 pp. 180–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, J. A. & Wharton, R. H. (1956). Trials of residual insecticides in window-trap huts against Malayan mosquitos.—Bull. ent. Res. 47 pp. 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, P. F. & Baisas, F. E. (1934). A practical illustrated key to larvae of Philippine Anopheles.—Philipp. J. Sci. 55 pp. 307–336.Google Scholar
Russell, P. F. & Baisas, F. E. (1936). A practical illustrated key to adults of Philippine Anopheles.—Philipp. J. Sci. 59 pp. 15–64.Google Scholar
Schreiber, G. & Memoria, J. M. P. (1957). Alguns aspectos do problema do polimorfismo cromossômico e ecologia em anofelinos brasileiros.—Rev. bras. Malariol. 9 pp. 101–103.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (1961). A synoptic catalog of the mosquitoes of the world, supplement I (Diptera: Culicidae).—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 63 pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Strickland, C. & Chowdhury, K. L. (1927). An illustrated key to the identification of the Anopheline larvae of India, Ceylon, and Malaya …—67 pp. Calcutta, Thacker, Spink.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, N. H. (1919). Eenige voor Nederl.-Indië nieuwe Anophelinen.—Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Ind. 59 pp. 8–19.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, N. H. & Rodenwaldt, E. (1932). Die Anophelen von Niederländisch-Ostindien.—242 pp. Jena, Fischer.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, N. H. & Swellengrebel De Graaf, J. M. H. (1919). Description of the Anopheline larvae of Netherland's India, so far as they are known till now.—Meded. burgerl. geneesk. Dienst Ned.-Ind. 6, 47 pp.Google Scholar
Swellengrebel, N. H. & Swellengrebel De Graaf, J. M. H. (1920). List of the Anophelines of the Malay Archipelago with special reference to adults and larvae of new or incompletely described species or varieties.—Bull, ent. Res. 11 pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbino, C. M. (1936). The eggs of some Philippine Anopheles.—Mon. Bull. Bur. Hlth Philipp. 16 pp. 261–273.Google Scholar
Venhuis, W. G. (1939). Voorloopige entomologische mededeelingen omtrent An. barbirostris van Celebes.—Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Ind. 79 pp. 2515–2519.Google Scholar
Vickers, W. J. & Strahan, J. H. [1937]. A health survey of the State of Kedah …–96 pp. Kuala Lumpur, Kyle Palmer.Google Scholar
Walch, E. W. & Walch-Sorgdrager, G. B. (1935). De eieren van eenige Anophelinen in Ned.-Indië.—Geneesk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Ind. 75 pp. 1700–1730.Google Scholar
Walker, F. (1860). Catalogue of the Dipterous insects collected at Makessar hi Celebes, by Mr. A. E. Wallace, with descriptions of new species.—J. Proc. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 4 pp. 90–172 (read 2nd June, 1859).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R. H. (1950). Daytime resting places of Anopheles maculatus and other Anophelines in Malaya, with results of precipitin tests.—Med. J. Malaya 4 pp. 260–271.Google Scholar
Wharton, R. H. (1951). The habits of adult mosquitoes in Malaya. I. Observations on anophelines in window-trap huts and at cattle-sheds.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 45 pp. 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R. H. (1953). The habits of adult mosquitoes in Malaya. III. Feeding preferences of Anophelines.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 47 pp. 272–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wharton, R. H. (1955). The susceptibility of various species of mosquitos to DDT, dieldrin and BHC.—Bull. ent. Res. 46 pp. 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R. H. (1960a). Studies on filariasis in Malaya: field and laboratory investigations of the vectors of a rural strain of Wuchereria bancrofti.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 54 pp. 78–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wharton, R. H. (1960b). The biology of Mansonia (Mansonioides) mosquitoes in relation to the transmission of filariasis in Malaya.—Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Malaya, Singapore.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. B. (1926). Mosquito researches: investigations dealing with ricefields.—Malay, med. J. 1 pp. 21–27.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. & Reid, J. A. (1949). Malaria among prisoners of war in Siam (“F ’ Force).—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 43 pp. 257–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, T. & others. (1958). The occurrence of two forms of Wuchereria malayi in man.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 52 pp. 480–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Wulp, F. M. (1884). Note 38. On exotic Diptera. Part I.—Notes Leyden Mus. 6 pp. 248–256.Google Scholar
De Zulueta, J. (1956). Malaria in Sarawak and Brunei.—Bull. World Hlth Org. 15 pp. 651–671.Google ScholarPubMed
De Zulueta, J. & Lachance, F. (1956). A malaria-control experiment in the interior of Borneo.—Bull. World Hlth Org. 15 pp. 673–693.Google ScholarPubMed