Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:30:48.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An insect sorting device to be used in conjunction with insect suction samplers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. Moore ,
R.T. Clarke  and
S. Creer
R. Moore*
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Furzebrook Research Station, UK
R.T. Clarke
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Furzebrook Research Station, UK
S. Creer
Affiliation:
University of Bath, School of Biological Sciences, UK
*
Dr R. Moore, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Furzebrook Research Station, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5AS, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new field-based method for sorting insects collected in suction samplers is proposed. Test sampling on grassland showed that for most taxonomic groups it was over 80% efficient. The efficiency of sorting for certain insect groups was influenced by the amount of debris in the sample. However, it was possible to determine a relationship between these two variables which enabled a correction factor to be calculated and used to compensate for this. It is suggested that popular use of this technique would radically increase the amount of research performed in the field.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 113 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, A.J., Needham, P.H. & Stevenson, J.H. (1973) A selfpowered portable insect suction sampler and its use to assess the effects of azinphos methyl and endosulfan on blossom beetle populations on oil seed rape. Annals of Applied Biology 75, 229–233.Google Scholar
British Herpetological Society Conservation Committee (1991) Surveying for amphibians. Advisory leaflet. pp. 1–12. British Herpetological Society, London.Google Scholar
De Barro, P.J. (1991) A cheap lightweight efficient vacuum sampler. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 30, 207–208.Google Scholar
Dietrick, E.J. (1961) An improved back pack motor fan for suction sampling of insect populations. Journal of Economic Entomology 54, 394–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrick, E.J., Schlinger, E.I. & van den Bosch, R. (1959) A new method for sampling arthropods using a suction collecting machine and modified Berlese funnel separator. Journal of Economic Entomology 52, 1085–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genstat (1987) The Genstat 5 committee of the statistics department, Rothamsted Experimental Station. Genstat 5 Reference manual, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. & Stuart, A. (1977) The advanced theory of statistics Volume 1 260 pp. London, Griffin & Co.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A. (1989) Generalised linear models. 2nd edn. pp. 98–148. London, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M.G. (1973) Ecological studies of grassland leafhoppers with special reference to Psammotetix confinis (Dahlbom) (Cicadellidae, Hemiptera). PhD Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insect populations. 2nd edn. 524 pp. London, Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Summers, C.G., Garrett, R.E. & Zalom, F.G. (1984) New suction device for sampling arthropod populations. Journal of Economic Entomology 77, 813–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A.F. & Stewart, A.J.A. (1992) A study of the efficacy of a new inexpensive type of suction apparatus in quantitative sampling of grassland invertebrate populations. Bulletin of the British Ecological Society 23, 116–120.Google Scholar