Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:37:41.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adverse effects of ivermectin on the dung beetles, Caccobius jessoensis Harold, and rare species, Copris ochus Motschulsky and Copris acutidens Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2007

M. Iwasa ,
T. Maruo ,
M. Ueda  and
N. Yamashita
M. Iwasa*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan
T. Maruo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan
M. Ueda
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomology, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan
N. Yamashita
Affiliation:
Department of Upland Farming, National Agricultural Research Center for Tohoku Region, 50 Harajuku Minami, Arai, Fukushima 960-2156, Japan
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +81 155 49 5492 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effects of the antiparasitic drug, ivermectin, on the dung beetles, Caccobius jessoensis Harold, 1867 and the rare species, Copris ochus Motschulsky, 1860 and Copris acutidens Motschulsky, 1860 were studied in laboratory and field experiments in Hokkaido, Japan. Ivermectin was detected in dung from 1 to 21 or 28 days following treatment, with a peak on the first day after treatment in two pour-on administrations (500 μg kg−1), although there were considerable differences between the two peaks. In C. jessoensis, brood balls constructed by the female were not reduced in the dung of treated cattle except for seven days after treatment in experiment 2. Also, there was no significant difference in the mean weight of brood balls between dung from treated and control cattle. However, the emergence rates were significantly reduced in dung 1–3 days after treatment. In the field study, brood balls constructed by C. jessoensis were more abundant in dung from treated cattle in experiment 1, but adult emergence was significantly reduced at one and seven days after treatments. Adult mortality of C. ochus Motschulsky at 90 days after the beginning of rearing was 11.1% in dung from control cattle with 22 brood balls constructed, whereas it was 84% in dung from treated cattle with no brood balls and/or ovipositioning. Also, in C. acutidens Motschulsky, adult mortality at 90 days after the beginning of rearing was 3.6% in dung from control cattle with 13 brood balls constructed, whereas it was 94.1% in dung from treated cattle with no brood balls or ovipositioning. The environmental risk in the use of ivermectin during breeding period of dung beetles in pasture is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 97 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 619 - 625
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bang, H.S., Huerta, C., Kim, J.I. & Goo, T.W. (2001) Studies on the ecology of oviposition of Copris tripartius Waterhouse and Copris ochus (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Korean Journal of Entomology 58, 522–533.Google Scholar
Bang, H.S., Kwon, O.S., Hwang, S.J., Mah, Y.I. & Wardhaugh, K.G. (2004) Developmental biology and phenology of a Korean native dung beetles, Copris ochus (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Scarabaiedae). The Coleopterists Bulletin 58, 522–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, S. & Alvinerie, M. (2003) Comment on “A comparison of persistent anthelmintic efficacy of topical formulations of doramectin, eprinomectin, ivermectin and moxidectin against naturally acquired nematode infections of beef calves” and problems associated with mechanical transfer (licking) of endoectocides in cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 112, 255–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benz, G.W. (1985) Animal health applications of ivermectin. Southwestern Entomologist 7, 2–10.Google Scholar
Campbell, W.C., Fisher, M.H., Stapley, E.O., Albers-Schönberg, G. & Jacob, T.A. (1983) Ivermectin: a potent new antiparasitic agent. Science 221, 823–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, D.F., Dadour, I.R. & Ali, D.N. (1996) Effect of diet on the excretion profile of ivermectin in cattle faeces. International Journal of Parasitology 26, 291–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dadour, I.R., Cook, D.F. & Hennessy, D. (2000) Reproduction and survival of the dung beetle Onthophagus binodis (Coleoptera: Scarabidae) exposed to abamectin and doramectin redidues in cattle dung. Physiological and Chemical Ecology 29, 1116–1122.Google Scholar
Drummond, R.O. (1985) Effectiveness of ivermectin for control of arthropod pests of livestock. Southwestern Entomologist 7, 34–42.Google Scholar
Fincher, G.T. (1992) Injectable ivermectin for cattle: Effects on some dung-inhabiting insects. Environmental Entomology 21, 871–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincher, G.T. (1996) Ivermectin pour-on for cattle: Effects on some dung-inhabiting insects. Southwestern Entomologist 21, 445–450.Google Scholar
Floate, K.D. (1998a) Off-target effects of ivermectin on insects and dung degradation in southern Alberta, Canada. Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D. (1998b) Does a repellent effect contribute to reduced levels of insect activity in dung from cattle treated with ivermectin? Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D., Colwell, D.D. & Fox, A.S. (2002) Reductions of non-pest insects in dung of cattle treated with endectocides: a comparison of four products. Bulletin of Entomological Reserach 92, 471–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floate, K.D., Wardhaugh, K.G., Boxall, A.B.A. & Sherratt, T.N. (2005) Faecal residues of veterinary parasiticides: nontarget effects in the pasture environment. Annual Review of Entomology 50, 153–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halffter, G. & Edmonds, W.D. (1982) The Nesting Behavior of Dung Beetles (Scarabaeidae): An Ecological and Evolutive Approach. 176 pp. Mexico D.F., Instituto de Ecologia.Google Scholar
Holter, P., Sommer, C., Grønvold, J. & Madsen, M. (1993) Effects of ivermectin treatment on the attraction of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae and Hydrophilidae) to cow pats. Bulletin of Entomological Research 83, 53–58.Google Scholar
Hori, S. (2005) On inhabiting situation of the Japanese species of the scarabeid genus Copris (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Konchu to Shizen 40, 6–9 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Houlding, B., Ridsdill-Smith, T.J. & Bailey, W.J. (1991) Injectable abamectin causes a delay in scarabaeinae dung beetle egg-laying in cattle dung. Australian Veterinary Journal 68, 185–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasa, M., Maryuama, M., Nakamura, E., Yamashita, N. & Watanabe, A. (2005a) Effects of ivermectin on target and non-target dun-breeding flies (Diptera) in cattle dung pats. Medical Entomology and Zoology 56, 191–199.Google Scholar
Iwasa, M., Nakamura, T., Fukaki, K. & Yamashita, N. (2005b) Non-target effects of ivermectin on coprophagous insects in Japan. Environmental Entomology 35, 1485–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, K. & Scholtz, C.H. (1997) Lethal and sublethal effects of ivermectin on the dung-breeding beetles Euoniticellus intermedius (Reiche) and Onitis alexis Klug (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 61, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, K. & Scholtz, C.H. (1998) Changes in the structure of dung insect communities after ivermectin usage in a grassland ecosystem. I. Impact of ivermectin under drought conditions. Acta Oecologica 19, 425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumaret, J.P., Galante, E., Lumbreras, C., Mena, J., Bertrand, M., Bernal, J.L., Cooper, J.F., Kadiri, N. & Crow, D. (1993) Field effects of ivermectin residues on dung beetles. Journal of Applied Ecology 30, 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, M., Nielsen, B.O., Holter, P., Pedersen, O.C., Jespersen, J.B., Vagn Jensen, K.-M., Nansen, P. & Grønvold, J. (1990) Treating cattle with ivermectin: effects on the fauna and decomposition of dung pats. Journal of Applied Ecology 27, 1–15.Google Scholar
McCracken, D.I. (1993) The potential for avermectins to affect wildlife. Veterinary Parasitology 48, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J.A., Kunz, S.E., Oehler, D.D. & Miller, R.W. (1981) Larvicidal activity of Merk MK-933, an avermectin against the horn fly, stable fly, and house fly. Journal of Economic Entomology 74, 608–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, L.D., Hicks, M.B. & Wehner, T.A. (1995) Determination of abamectin and/or ivermectin in cattle feces at low parts per billion levels using HPLC with fluorescence detection. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 43, 1233–1237.Google Scholar
Ridsdill-Smith, T.J. (1988) Survival and reproduction of Musca vetustissima Walker (Diptera: Muscidae) and a scarabaeine dung beetle in dung of cattle treated with avermectin B1. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 27, 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncalli, R.A. (1989) Environmental aspects of use of ivermectin and abamectin in livestock: effects on cattle dung fauna. pp. 173–181in Campbell, W.C. (Ed.) Ivermectin and Abamectin. New York, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, C. & Nielsen, B.O. (1992) Larvae of the dung beetle Onthophagus gazella F. (Col., Scarabaeidae) exposed to lethal and sublethal ivermectin concentrations. Journal of Applied Entomology 114, 502–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, C., Steffansen, B., Nielsen, B.O., Grønvold, J., Vagn Jensen, K.-M., Jespersen, J.B., Springborg, J. & Nansen, P. (1992) Ivermectin excreted in cattle dung after subcutaneous injection or pour-on treatment: concentrations and impact on dung fauna. Bulletin of Entomological Research 82, 257–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, L. (1992) Avermectins: a review of their impact on insects of cattle dung. Bulletin of Entomological Research 82, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, L. (1993) Overview: the impact of avermectins on pastureland ecology. Veterinary Parasitology 48, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strong, L. & Wall, R. (1988) Ivermectin in cattle treatment: non-specific effects on pastureland ecology. Aspects of Applied Biology 17, 231–238.Google Scholar
Strong, L. & Wall, R. (1994) Effects of ivermectin and moxidectin on the insects of cattle dung. Bulletin of Entomological Research 84, 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukamoto, K. (2003) Nihon-Rettou Funchu-ki. 225 pp. Tokyo, Seido-sha (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Wall, R. & Strong, L. (1987) Environmental consequences of treating cattle with the antiparasitic drug ivermectin. Nature 327, 418–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardhaugh, K.G. & Mahon, R.J. (1991) Avermectin residues in sheep and cattle dung and their effects on dung-beetle (Coleoptera; Scarabaeidae) colonization and dung burial. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wardhaugh, K.G. & Rodriguez-Menendez, H. (1988) The effects of the antiparasitic drug, ivermectin, on the development and survival of the dung-breeding fly, Orthellia cornicina (F.) and the scarabaeine dung beetles, Copris hispanus L., Bubas bubalus (Oliver) and Onitis belial F. Journal of Applied Entomology 106, 381–389.Google Scholar
Yamashita, N., Yoshida, N., Watanabe, A. & Mikami, A. (2004) Effects of the anthelmintics on development of the dung degrading insects. Tohoku Agricultural Research 57, 119–120 (in Japanese).Google Scholar