No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The use of milk replacers and the effect on subsequent performance of newborn piglets
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Abstracts of poster presentations
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1989
References
Alsing, I.
1976. Untersuchungen über den Einfluss der maternalen Effekts auf die Heritabilität der Wurfrösse bei Sauen. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Zurich.Google Scholar
Csarnecki, R., Wejehsza, D. and Owsianny, J.
1986. Effect of the litter size in which young sows and boars were reared on their future reproductive performance. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of The European Association of Animal Production, Budapest.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R. and Fraser, D.
1985. The effect of pre-weaning supplementary food on the growth of piglets after weaning at 25 days. Animal Production
40: 547 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Hampson, D. J.
1986. Alterations in piglet small intestinal structure at weaning. Research in Veterinary Science
40: 32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
den Hartog, L., Verstegen, M. and Everts, H.
1985
Recente ontwikkelingen op het gebied van zeugen/baby voeding. Verslag Symposium Pricor, Nieuwegein, pp. 74–85.Google Scholar
van der Heyde, H.
1983. Biggenopfok en vruchtbaarheid van de zeug na korte lactatierduur. Aggregaatsthesis, Faculteit van de Landbouw-wetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Gent.Google Scholar
van der Heyde, H. and Lievens, R.
1982. L'influence de sevrage précoce et de la taille de la nichée élevée par le truie sur les performances d'engrassement et de reproduction du porcelet. Revue de l'Agriculture
35: 3195–3206.Google Scholar
van der Heyde, H. and Lievens, R.
1984a. Effect of early weaning, fractionated weaning and litter size on subsequent reproductive performance of piglets. Results of Pig Research, I.W.O.N.L., Brussels, pp. 209–213.Google Scholar
van der Heyde, H. and Lievens, R.
1984b. Effect of early weaning, fractionated early weaning and litter size on ulterior reproductive performance of piglets. Proceedings of 35th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, The Hague.Google Scholar
Johansson, K.
1980. Some notes concerning the genetic possibilities of improving sow fertility. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Miller, B. G., Newby, T. J., Stokes, C. R. and Bourne, F. J.
1984. Influence of diet on post-weaning malabsorption and diarrhoea in the pig. Research in Veterinary Science
36: 187–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Op de Beck, M. and Castaldo, M.
1983. Méthode de nutrition et technique d'élevage des porcelets avec un aliment d'allaitement acide: intérêt technique de sone utilisation en complement de l'alimantation composée traditionelle. Bulletin de la Société Vétéinaire Pratique de France
67: (6), 1–16.Google Scholar
Revelle, T. and Robison, O.
1973. An explanation for the low heritability of litter size in swine. Journal of Animal Science
37: 668–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rijen, M.
1985. Aangezuurde kunstmelk voor biggen tijdens de zoogperiode. Proefverslag, Sterksel, No. 44.Google Scholar
Robison, O.
1972. The role of maternal effect on animal breeding. Journal of Animal Science
36: 1305–1315.Google Scholar
van der Steen, H.
1985. Maternal influence mediated by litter size during the suckling period on reproductive traits in pigs. Livestock Production Science
13: 147–158.Google Scholar
van der Steen, H., den Hartog, L., de Groot, P. and de Roo, K.
1983. Landbouwhogeschool, onderzocht Porcomel. Boerderij/Varkenshoulderij
68: 14–15.Google Scholar
You have
Access