Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:58:02.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revealing public preferences for farm animal welfare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

D. E. B. Burgess ,
W. G. Hutchinson  and
J. Davis
D. E. B. Burgess
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
W. G. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
J. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Poster abstracts
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 23: Farm animal welfare — who writes the rulse? , January 1999 , pp. 104 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

References

Edwards, A. L. 1957. Techniques of attitude scale construction. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., Slovic, P. and Sattath, S. 1988. Contingent weighting in judgement and choice. Psychological Review 95: 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar