Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:24:09.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research and extension in livestock development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J. B. Schiere
J. B. Schiere*
Affiliation:
Department of Tropical Animal Production, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

This paper discusses results, justifications and definitions of research and extension in tropical animal production. The emphasis is on the applicability of new technologies and the interaction between research and extension. A description is given of the participants, the farming systems and of the research-extension interaction with attention to the fact that much extension is technology driven rather than problem orientated. Special issues in the livestock sector are highlighted. The diversity of farming systems implies that generalized solutions are hard to find because of technical and institutional problems. A globally decreasing resource-base implies that solutions are to be found in making the system more efficient rather than in relying on ever-increasing use of inputs though inputs per se are still important. Some research results are listed and case studies illustrate how the resource-base affects the applicability of extension messages that originate from research. The use of models is advocated to determine priorities for research or extension. Failures to find quick field applications should lead to mobilization of existing information as well as to a reorientation, improved quality and better interaction of research and extension.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 16: Animal Production in Developing Countries , 1993 , pp. 135 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arora, S. P., Parvinder, , Khizwar, S. S., Chopra, R. C. and Ludri, R. S. 1975. Selenium levels in fodders and its relation with degnela disease. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 28: 248–252.Google Scholar
Bhatia, K. C. and Kaira, D. S. 1981 Clinico-hematological studies on Degnala disease. Indian Veterinary journal 58: 94–98.Google Scholar
Carson, R. L. 1962. Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin, USA.Google Scholar
Chambers, R., Pacey, A. and Thrupp, L. A. ed. 1989. Farmers first. ITP, London.Google Scholar
Collinson, M. P. 1987. Farming systems research: procedures for technology development. Experimental Agriculture 23:365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, G. R. and Barbier, E. B. 1990. After the green revolution, sustainable agriculture for development. Earthscan Publications, London.Google Scholar
Crotty, R. 1980. Cattle, economics and development. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
De Wit, J., Dhaka, J. P. and Rao, Subba. 1991. Relevance of breeding and management for more or better straw in different farming systems. In Feeding of ruminants on fibrous crop residues. Aspects of treatment, feeding nutrient evaluation, research and extension (ed. Singh, Kiran and Schiere, J. B.) Proceedings of workshop. Karnal, India.Google Scholar
Farrington, J. and Martin, A. 1988. Farmer participation in agricultural research: a review of concepts and practices. Occasional paper, ODI, Agricultural Administration Unit, London, no. 9.Google Scholar
Francis, Ch. A., Flora, C. B. and King, L. D. ed. 1990. Sustainable agriculture in temperate zones. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Gahiot, O. P., Rao, S. V. N., Pradhan, P. K., Desai, S. M., Shukla, S. G. and Jape, A. S. 1991. Felt needs of dairy farmers, a case study from cattle development centres in Saurashtra, Gujarat. In Feeding of ruminants on fibrous crop residues. Aspects of treatment, feeding, nutrient evaluation, research and extension (Singh, Kiran and Schiere, J. B., ed), proceedings of workshop. Karnal, India.Google Scholar
Gryseels, G. 1988. Role of livestock on mixed smallholder farm in the Ethiopian highlands. A case study from the Baso and Worena werada near Debre Berhan. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen, Department of Tropical Animal Production.Google Scholar
Homb, T. 1984. Wet treatment with sodium hydroxide. In Straw and other fibrous by-products as feed (ed. Sundstol, F. and Owen, E.), Handbook of Agriculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Indian Council of Agricultural Research. 1987. Handbook of agriculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
Indian Council of Agricultural Research. 1991. Feeding of ruminants of fibrous crop residues (ed. Singh, Kiran and Schiere, J. B.), Proceedings of a workshop of the Indo-Dutch project on bioconversion. New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Iqbal Shah, I., Habib, G. and Hausler, C. 1990. Information needs for Rod Kohi livestock development in Khan, D. I.. In Rod kohi agricultural problems and perspectives, symposium at Pakistan Agricultural Council, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 134–145.Google Scholar
Kesseba, A. M. ed. 1989. Technology systems for small farmers. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Kaimowitz, D. 1990. Making the link, agricultural research and technology transfer in developing countries. Westuieiu Sorcini Studies in Agricultural Science and Policy. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Korevaar, H. and Den Boer, D. J. 1990. Practical measures to reduce nutrient losses from grassland systems. Paper read before the Fertilizer Society in London. The Fertilizer Society, Peterborough.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A., Preston, T. R., Sansoucy, R. and Kunju, P. J. G. 1991. Multinutrient blocks as a strategic supplement for ruminants. World Animal Review. 67:(2), 11–20.Google Scholar
Little, D. A., Anderson, F. M. and Durkin, J. W. 1991. Influence of partial suckling of crossbred dairy cows on milk offtake and calf growth in the Ethiopian highlands. Tropical Animal Health and Production 23:108–114.Google Scholar
Longman. 1985. Concise English dictionary. Longman Group Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Lowdermilk, M. K. 1972. Diffusion of dwarf wheat production technology in Pakistan's Punjab. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Maalouf, W. D. 1989. Paper presented at the ISREP seminar (International Seminar on Rural Extension Politics). International Agricultural Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Merril-Sands, D., Kaimowitz, D., Sayce, K. and Chater, S. 1989. The technology triangle “linking farmers, technology transfer agents and agricultural researchers”. Summary report of an international workshop at ISN AR, The Hague.Google Scholar
McDermott, K. J. 1987. Making extension effective: the role of extension/research linkages. In Agricultural extension worldwide (ed. Rivera, W. M. and Schram, G. S.), p. 89. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
Mosher, A. T. 1966. Celling agriculture moving. Agricultural Development Council, New York.Google Scholar
Nell, A. J. 1986. Feed cost in different farming systems. In Rice straw and related feeds in ruminant rations (ed. Schiere, J. B. and Ibrahim, M. N. M.), proceedings of an international loorkshop held in Kandy, Sri Lanka, pp. 326–336. Straw Utilization Project (SUP), Kandy, Sri Lanka.Google Scholar
Nordblom, T. L., Ahmed, A. K. H. and Potts, G. R. ed. 1985. Research methodology for livestock on farm trials, proceedings of a workshop held at Aleppo (Syria). ICARDA/IDRC.Google Scholar
Owen, E. and Jayasuriya, M. C. N. 1989. Use of crop residues as animal feeds in developing countries. Research and Development in Agriculture 6:129–138.Google Scholar
Patil, B. R., Rangnekar, D. V. and Schiere, J. B. 1991. Optimization of crop livestock integration, a preliminary model for small farm conditions. In Feeding of ruminants on fibrous crop residues, aspects of treatment, feeding, nutrient evaluation, research and extension (ed. Singh, Kiran and Schiere, J. B.). Proceedings of workshop of the Indo-Dutch project on bioconversion, NDRt, Kantal, India.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Ugarte, J. 1972. Rearing dairy calves by restricted suckling. World Animal Review 3:28–30.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D., Capper, B. S. and Neate, P. J. H. ed. 1988. Plant breeding and the nutritive value of crop residues. Proceedings of a workshop held at the International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 1987. ILCA, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Röling, N. 1988. Extension science, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Röling, N. 1989. The agricultural research-technology transfer interface: knowledge systems perspective. International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR), The Hague.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V. W. 1982. Agricultural research policy, chapter 10, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Schiere, J. B. and Ibrahim, M. N. M. 1989. Feeding of urea ammonia treated rice straw. PUDOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Schiere, J. B. and Sewalt, V. J. H. 1988. Differences in field applications of straw treatment with urea. In Fibrous crop residues as animal feed. (ed. Schiere, J. B. and Singh, Kiran), proceedings of an international workshop at the National Dairy Research Institute, Southern Regional Station, Bangalore, India, pp. 8–16.Google Scholar
Straus, M. A. 1962. Social-psychological aspect of extension research organization. In National extension research seminar, US Department of Agriculture, Washington.Google Scholar
Van den Ban, A. W. and Hawkins, H. S. 1988. Agricultural extension. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar