Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:15:44.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between genetic merit for yield and live weight, condition score, and energy balance of spring calving Holstein-Friesian dairy cows on grass based systems of milk production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

F. Buckley ,
P. Dillon ,
M. Rath  and
R.F. Veerkamp
F. Buckley
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin Dairy Husbandry Dept, Teagasc, Moorepark, Production Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork
P. Dillon
Affiliation:
Dairy Husbandry Dept, Teagasc, Moorepark, Production Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork
M. Rath
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin
R.F. Veerkamp
Affiliation:
,Dept. of Animal Breeding and Genetics, ID-DLO.8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the effects of genetic merit for milk yield on energy balance (EB), dry matter intake (DMI), and fertility for cows managed on three different grass based feeding systems, and to estimate possible interactions between genetic merit and feeding system. Individual animal intake estimates were obtained at pasture on 11 occasions across three grazing seasons. The data set contained 96 first lactation animals in 1995, 96 second lactation animals in 1996, and 72 third lactation animals in 1997. Half of these animals were of high (HG), and half of medium genetic merit (MG) for milk solids production. Genetic effects for the traits of interest were estimated as the contrast between the two genetic groups, and by the genetic regression of phenotypic performance on the estimated breeding value for fat and protein yield, based on pedigree information alone (PI). Significant effects of feeding system were observed on yields, DMI and EB, whereas there was no effect on live weight, condition score or reproductive performance. The interaction between genetic merit and feeding system was not significantly different from zero for any of the traits. Yields, grass DMI, and total DMI were all higher for HG than for MG, and also positively correlated (P<0.001) with PI. Furthermore, condition score, conception to first and second service, and pregnancy rate were significantly negatively correlated with PI. While at pasture, EB was positively (P<0.01) correlated with PI, although the contrast between HG and MG was not significantly different from zero. Condition score changes during very early lactation, demonstrated that HG had a more negative EB than MG. The results clearly illustrate the production potential of HG cows on grass based systems, however the reduced reproductive performance questions their suitability for seasonal calving systems.

Type
Offered Theatre Papers
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 26 , Issue 2: Fertility in the High-Producing Dairy Cow , September 2001 , pp. 297 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AFRC, 1993. Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants. An Advisory Manual Prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Response to Nutrients. CAB Int., Wallingford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Bauman, D.E. and W.B., Currie, 1980. Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 1514–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, W.R., Everett, R.W. and Coppock, C.E., 1981. The relationship between energy balance, milk production and ovulation in post partum Holstein cows. Journal of Animal Science 53: 742–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, W.R. and Smith, R.D., 1989. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 767–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dillon, P. and Stakelum, G., 1989. Herbage and dosed alkanes as a grass measurement technique for dairy cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 28: 104 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Dillon, P., Crosse, S., Stakelum, G., and Flynn, F., 1995. The effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring-calving dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 50: 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genstat 5 Release 4.1,1997. Lawes Agricultural TrustGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, J., van der Lugt, A.W., Van der Werf, J.H.J. and Ouweltjes, W., 1994. Genetic and Phenotypic parameters for milk production and reproductive performance traits in upgraded dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 40: 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, N.J., 1991. Spatial heterogenity and other sources of variance in sward height as measured by the sonic and the HFRO sward sticks. Grass and Forage Science, 46: 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, B.C., 1961. Body condition score and it'Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture, 32: 19–21.Google Scholar
Mayes, R.W., Lamb, C.S. and Colgrove, P.A., 1986. The use of dosed herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 107: 161–170.Google Scholar
Peterson, R., 1988. Comparison of Canadian and New Zealand sires in New Zealand for production, weight and conformation traits. Livestock Improvement Corporation, Research Bulletin, No. 5.Google Scholar
Richardson, D.O., Owen, J.R., Plowman, R.D. and Miles, J.T., 1971. Importance of sire x ration interactions in production and feed intake traits of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 54: 1518–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal, M.D., Darwash, A.O. and Lamming, G.E., 1998. Trends in the fertility of dairy cows in the United Kingdom. Page 15 In: International Symposium on Metabolic Stress in Dairy Cows BSAS - EU concerted action - BCVA, Edinburough, Scotland.Google Scholar
Van Arendonk, J.A.M., Nieuwhof, G.J., Vos, H. and Korver, S., 1991. Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers. Livestock Production Science 29: 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerkamp, R.F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J.D., 1994. Effects of interaction between genotype and feeding system on milk production, feed intake, efficiency and body tissue mobilisation in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 39: 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerkamp, R.F. and Emmans, G.C., 1995. Sources of genetic variation in energetic efficiency of dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 44: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veerkamp, R.F., 1998. Selection for economic efficiency of Dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: A review. Journal of Dairy 81: 1109–1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed