Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T17:07:17.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction of 48 h in situ degradability from chemical analyses and in vitro fermentation of sugar cane bagasse treated with varying levels of electron irradiation and ammonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

D. M. S. S. Vitti
Affiliation:
Animal Science Section, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Caixa Postal 96-CEP 13400-970, Piracicaba, SP.-Brazil
A. L. Abdalla
Affiliation:
Animal Science Section, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Caixa Postal 96-CEP 13400-970, Piracicaba, SP.-Brazil
J. C. S. Filho
Affiliation:
Animal Science Section, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Caixa Postal 96-CEP 13400-970, Piracicaba, SP.-Brazil
N. L. del Mastro
Affiliation:
Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares, SP.-Brazil
R. Mauricio
Affiliation:
Departament of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG 6AT
E. Owen
Affiliation:
Departament of Agriculture, University of Reading, Earley Gate, PO Box 236, Reading RG 6AT
Get access

Extract

Sugar cane bagasse is produced in large quantities in Brazil. The cultivated area of sugar cane in recent years has been around 4.2 X 106 ha/year, with a production of about 270 X 106 t/year of cane. As each tonne of cane produces around 300 kg of bagasse by-product, a large quantity of bagasse is generated.

Bagasse is of low dry matter (DM) digestibility (about 250 g/kg), because of lignification. Efforts have been made to improve the digestibility of bagasse using treatment with chemicals (sodium hydroxide, ammonia) or steam (Abdalla et al., 1990). Although steam and pressure treatments have improved in situ degradability, intake and digestibility in cattle were disappointing (Mello et al, 1989). Recently treatment of bagasse with irradiation and ammonia have been investigated.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdalla, A. L., Vitti, D. M. S. S. and Silva Filho, J. C. 1990. Treated sugar cane bagasse for sheep. Tropical Agriculture 67:9394.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). Agricultural handbook, US Department of Agriculture, no. 379.Google Scholar
Flachowsky, G., Bar, M., Sabine, Z. and Tiroke, K. 1990. Cell wall content and rumen dry matter disappearance of irradiated wood by products. Biological Wastes 34:181189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, C. A., Costa, L. R. O., Machado, P. F., D'Arce, R. D. and Mattos, W. R. S. 1989. Effect of steam and pressure treatment of sugar cane bagasse on in vitro degradability and in vivo digestibility. Livestock Research for Rural Development 1:4753.Google Scholar
Somogyi, M. 1952. Notes on sugar determination. Journal of Biological Chemistry 195:1923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, T. and Hills, W. E. 1959. The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica. 1. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 10:6368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodorou, M. K., Williams, B. A., Dhanoa, M. S., McAllan, A. B. and France, J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48:185197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar