Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T17:11:40.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National and international policies and legislation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

Brian J. Revell
Brian J. Revell
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, 581 King St., Aberdeen, AB9 1UD
Get access

Extract

In considering markets for meat, it is important to distinguish between what a market may want and what it can have. The objectives and operation of national and international policies and legislation are frequently at variance with those of the marketplace. Policies have been designed either to modify market signals or to offset some of their effects, principally on production, but also on consumption and trade. They usually place constraints on availability and/or radically alter price signals to producers. In a recent report (OECD, 1982), it was observed that

‘Government intervention in domestic and international meat markets is increasing. All major beef importing countries now control beef imports in some way or another. The introduction of the EEC Sheepmeat Regime could in the future have a major impact on the pattern of sheepmeat trade flows. The importation of meat by many of the newly developed markets is controlled by state trading institutions.’

Type
Factors Influencing the Markets for Meat
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 8: Matching Production to the Markets for Meat , January 1984 , pp. 13 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

CBF. 1980a. Report on Libya and Tunisia. CBF Irish Livestock and Meat Board, Market Study, July, Dublin.Google Scholar
CBF. 1980b. Report on Saudi Arabia and Egypt. CBF Market Study, November, Dublin.Google Scholar
CBF. 1981. Report on Algeria and Morocco. CBF Market Study, September, Dublin.Google Scholar
EC. 1982. The Situation of the Agricultural Markets Report 1982. Com(82) 794 Final. Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
FAO. 1982. Guidelines for International Co-operation the Livestock and Meat Sector. Committee on Commodity Problems, Intergovernmental Group on Meat, CCP:ME 83/5.Google Scholar
FAO. 1983. Report of the Tenth Session of the Intergovernmental Group on Meat to the Committee on Commodity Problems. CCP:83/9.Google Scholar
Harris, S., Swinbank, A. and Wilkinson, G. 1983. The Food and Farm Policies of the European Community. Wiley.Google Scholar
Hillman, J. S. 1978. Nontariff Agricultural Trade Barriers. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1983. Meat and Meat Products. Conference paper No. 8 at The EEC and the Food Industries. University of Reading, 8–9 September.Google Scholar
MLC. 1983a. EEC and World Market Prices for Meat and Livestock. European Booklet 83/3, MLC Economic Information Service.Google Scholar
MLC. 1983b. The Supply of Beef to Meat Manufacturers. MLC Planning Development Team Report, February.Google Scholar
OECD. 1982. Internal Document, AGR(82)27, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Revell, B. J. 1982. Grass Fed Lamb in 1981 and the EEC Sheepmeat Regime: Future Implications. Farm Management Review. No. 16, January. North of Scotland College of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Revell, B. J. 1983. A Market Share Analysis of Meat Demand 1968–1982. In Meat Demand Trends, 83/2, MLC.Google Scholar
Revell, B. J., and Maclaren, D. 1984. The Impact of Agri-Monetary Policy on UK Trade in Beef and Veal. In Price and Market Policies in European Agriculture, Proceedings of Sixth EAAE Symposium, 14–15 September 1983, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar