Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T01:51:51.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Livestock and their interaction with the environment: an overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

H. Steinfeld
H. Steinfeld*
Affiliation:
FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy
Get access

Abstract

This paper draws on a recent multi-donor study on livestock and the environment and highlights how its findings might impact on research agendas worldwide. The soaring demand for meat and milk puts great pressure on the global natural resource base. About one-quarter of the world's total land area is used for grazing livestock. In addition, about one-fifth of the world's arable land is used for growing cereals for livestock food. Livestock production is the world's largest land user and may soon he its most important agricultural activity in terms of economic output. Livestock produce 13 billion tons of waste each year. A large part of this is recycled but, where animal concentrations are high, waste poses an environmental hazard. Water, already scarce in many parts of the world, is required not only for animals' drinking but also to grow food crops and for waste disposal. Pollution of land and water is another concern as is the impact by livestock, directly or indirectly, on biodiversity. Greenhouse gases from livestock and livestock waste contribute to global warming.

The paper provides an overview of critical livestock environment interactions, so-called hotspots, notably the overgrazing/degradation issue, deforestation, the ‘involution’ of mixed farming systems and the waste problem in areas of high animal concentrations. Measures that tackle only the superficial effects of environmental damage will never be as effective as a policy which attacks the underlying causes. Those causes are often deeply entrenched in what has become an almost universal fact: those who gain benefits from over-exploitation and degradation of the environment have not paid the full cost. Incorporating the environmental cost into the price of livestock products is critical to achieving sustainable development. The technological opportunities, and, therefore, the scope, for increasing livestock production, while simultaneously reducing the use of natural resources per unit of product, are enormous. Research needs to be channelled to reflect real scarcities of natural resources while respecting the need to maintain and improve livelihoods.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 21: Food, Lands and Livelihoods — setting research agendas for animal science , 1998 , pp. 67 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexandratos, N. 1995. World agriculture: towards 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome and John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
Behnke, R. H., Scoones, I. and Kerven, C. 1993. Range ecology in disequilibrium. Overseas Development Institute/ International Institute for Environment and Development Commonwealth Secretariat, London.Google Scholar
Bos, J. F. F. P. and Wit, J. de, . 1995. Environmental impact assessment of landless monogastric livestock production systems. Consultant's report for the multi-donor study on livestock and the environment.Google Scholar
Bouwman, A. F., Hoek, K. W. van der, and Olivier, J. G. J. 1995. Uncertainties in the global source distribution of nitrous oxide. Journal of Geophysical Research 100: 2785–2800.Google Scholar
Brandjes, P. J., Wit, J. de, , Meer, H. G. van der, and Keulen, H. van, . 1996. Environmental impact of animal manure management. Consultant's report for the multi-donor study on livestock and the environment.Google Scholar
Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical. 1994. Annual report 1993. CIAT, Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
Chiumenti, R., Borso, F. da, and Donanton, L. 1994. Dust and ammonia reduction in exhaust air from piggeries using a mechanical wet separation system. In: Proceedings of the seventh technical consultation of the European Cooperative Research Network on Animal Waste Utilization, Bad Zwischenahn, Germany, 17-20 May 1994.Google Scholar
Dregne, H., Kassas, M. and Rozanov, B. 1992. Status of desertification and implementation of the United Nations plan to combat desertification. Desertification control bulletin 20, 6.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. 1997. Current world fertilizer situation and outlook 1994/95-2000/2001. FAO/ UNIDO/World Bank Working Group on Fertilizer, Rome.Google Scholar
Hendy, C. R. C, Keih, U., Crawshaw, R. and Phillips, M. 1995. Interactions between livestock production systems and the environment: impact domain: concentrate feed demand. FAO Consultancy report for the multi-donor study on livestock and the environment.Google Scholar
Kaimonitz, D. 1995. Livestock and deforestation in Central America. EPTD discussion paper no 9. IFPRI, Washington, DC. and IICA, Coronado, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
Mainguet, M., Guyot, L., Chemin, M.-C. and Braunstein, A. 1992. Modifications to the Sahelian and Sudanian ecosystems in Western Mali. In Degradation and restoration of arid lands (ed. Dregne, H. E.). Texas, USA.Google Scholar
Muller, Z. O. 1980. Feed from animal wastes: state of knowledge. FAO, animal production and health paper no. 18. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Narjisse, H. 1996. The range livestock industry in developing countries, current assessments and prospects. Key note address at the fifth international rangeland congress, Salt Lake City, USA.Google Scholar
Narrod, C, Reynnels, R. and Wells, H. 1994. Potential options for poultry waste utilization: a focus on the Delmarva Peninsula. United States Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. 1990. Dryland management: “the desertification problem”. World Bank technical paper no. 116, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Oldeman, L. R., Hakkeling, R. T. A. and Sombroek, W. G. 1990. World map of the status of human induced soil degradation. An explanatory note. ISRIC/UNEP, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ottichilo, W. K. 1996. Wildlife-livestock interactions in Kenya. In Balancing livestock and the environment. World Bank/FAO workshop, an associated event to the fourth World Bank conference on environmentally sustainable development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Sere, C. and Steinfeld, H. 1996. World livestock production systems: current status, issues and trends. FAO animal production and health paper no. 127. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Sidahmed, A. E. 1996. The rangelands of the arid/semi-arid areas: challenges and hopes for the 2000's. Keynote address to the symposium on range management, the international conference on desert development in the Arab Gulf States, KISR, Kuwait, March 1996.Google Scholar
Tucker, C. J., Dregne, H. E. and Newcomb, W. W. 1991. Expansion and contraction of the Sahara desert from 1980–1990. Science 253: 299.Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. Study of livestock-environment interactions: global impact domain: methane emissions. Consultant's report for the multi-donor study on livestock and the environment.Google Scholar
Voorburg, J. H. 1994. Farmers options to reduce odor and ammonia emissions from animal buildings and storage. In: Proceedings of the seventh technical consultation of the European Cooperative Research Network on animal waste utilization, Bad Zwischenahn, Germany, 17-20 May 1994.Google Scholar
Wit, J. de, , Westra, P. T. and Nell, A. J. 1996. Environmental assessment of landless ruminant production systems. Consultant's report for the multi-donor study on livestock and the environment.Google Scholar
World Research Institute. 1992. World resources 1992/1993. World Research Institute. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Young, M. D. 1996. Maintaining harmony: equitable and efficient means to minimize adverse impact of livestock on the environment. In Balancing livestock and the environment. World Bank/FAO Workshop, an associated event to the fourth World Bank conference on environmentally sustainable development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar