Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:47:55.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integration of transgenes in breeding programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Charles Smith*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, CanadaN1G 2W1
Get access

Abstract

Conventional animal breeding is in a healthy state, with good rates of genetic change possible, and economic efficiency being continually improved in the different livestock species. New reproductive techniques offer faster rates of change, as with the use of embryo transfer in sheep and cattle breeding. It is now possible to introduce foreign DNA, transgenes, into the germ line of farm animals and this offers new opportunities in the genetic improvement of economic merit. The transgenes should be directed at traits of high economic value, and be made in elite breeding stocks to benefit from past genetic improvements. Much still needs to be learned about engineering transgenes and about the basic biochemical-physiological processes they are designed to affect. However many transgenes will be produced over the next decade, and some may be useful in animal improvement. Founder transgene individuals are unique for incorporation site, copy number and expression, and will require screening, multiplication, testing and evaluation, in both hemizygous (TO) and homozygous (TT) form, for all economic traits. For a transgene with a large useful net effect on economic merit, the most rapid genetic response will come from fixing it in the elite breeding stock. An effect of 5-10 percent in economic merit will be needed to offset the normal genetic improvement displaced. Current experience with transgenes is of very large effects on the target trait, but with deleterious effects on fitness and economic merit. Control of the level, tissue and time of expression are crucial to the practical use of transgenes. With uncertainty in the results of a transgenic program, conventional programs will have to be maintained, so extra investment will be required. Patent rights may bring extra benefits to breeders, but there are also risks if the stock prove defective. Breeding strategies and organization may also change. Despite initial problems and uncertainties, the power of the transgenic methods is so great that the development of transgenic stocks is likely to become a very important tool in genetic improvement of livestock in the future.

Type
Molecular Biology and Genetic Manipulation
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babiuk, L.A. 1988. Vaccine. In: Molecular genetics applied to animal breeding and production. Workshop Proceedings. 07 10-14, 1988. Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Bevilacqua, A., Erickson, R.P. and Hieber, V. 1988. Anti-sense RNA inhibits endogenous gene expression in mouse preimplantation embryos: Lack of double-stranded RNA “melting activity”. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 85: 831835.Google Scholar
Crittenden, L.B. and Salter, D.W. 1986. Gene insertion: Current progress and long-term goals. Avian Dis. 30: 4346.Google Scholar
Doetschman, T., Gregg, R.G., Maeda, N, Hooper, M., Melton, D.W., Thompson, S. and Smithies, O. 1987. Targetted correction of a mutant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 330: 576578.Google Scholar
Ezzell, C. 1988. First ever animal patent issued in United States. Nature 332: 668.Google Scholar
Gibson, J.P. and Smith, C. 1988. The incorporation of biotechnologies into animal breeding strategies. In: Comprehensive Biotechnology. First Supplement. Edited by Babiuk, L.A.. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Mercier, J.C. 1986. Genetic engineering applied to milk producing animals: some expectations. In: Exploiting new technologies in animal breeding. Edited by Smith, C., King, J.W.B. and McKay, J.C.. Oxford Science Publications.Google Scholar
Palmiter, R.D. and Brinster, R.L. 1986. Germline transformation of mice. Ann. Review of Genetics 20: 161.Google Scholar
Pursel, V.G., Rexford, C.E., Bolt, I.D., Miller, K.F., Wall, R.J., Hammer, R.E., Pinkert, C.A., Palmiter, R.D., Palmiter, R.L. and Brinster, R.L. 1987. Progress in gene transfer in animals. Vet. Immunology and Immunopathology 17: 302312.Google Scholar
Pursel, V.G., Campbell, R.G., Miller, K.F., Behringer, R.R., Palmiter, R.D. and Brinster, R.L. 1988. Growth potential of transgenic pigs expressing a bovine growth hormone gene. J. Anim. Sci. 66:Suppl. 267. Abstr.Google Scholar
Rexford, C.E., Behringer, R.R., Bolt, D.J., Miller, K.F., Palmiter, R.D. and Brinster, R.L. 1988. Insertion and expression of a growth hormone fusion gene in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 66:Suppl. 267. Abstr.Google Scholar
Simons, J.P., Wilmut, I., Clark, A.J., Archibald, A.L., Bishop, J.O. and Lathe, R. 1988. Gene transfer in sheep. Biotechnology 6: 179183.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1984. Rates of genetic change in farm livestock. Research and Development in Agriculture 1: 7985.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1988. Application of embryo transfer in animal breeding. Theriogenology 29: 203212.Google Scholar
Smith, C., Meuwissen, T.H.E. and Gibson, J.P. 1987. On the use of transgenes in livestock improvement. Animal Breeding Abstracts 55: 110.Google Scholar
Thomas, K.R. and Capecchi, M.R. 1987. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targetting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell. 51: 503512.Google Scholar
Ward, K.A. 1988. Strategies for future problem solving. In: Molecular genetics applied to animal breeding and production. Workshop Proceeding. 07 10-14, 1988. Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Wieghart, M., Hoover, J., Choe, S.H., McGrane, M.M., Roltman, F.M, Hanson, R.W. and Wagner, T.E. 1988. Transgenic pigs containing a chimeric bovine growth hormone (PEPCK/bCH) gene. J. Anim. Sci. 66:Suppl. 266. Abstr.Google Scholar