Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T05:03:53.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of the new statistical technology on pig improvement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A. J. Webb  and
P. R. Bampton
A. J. Webb
Affiliation:
Cotswold Pig Development Company Limited, Rothwell, Lincoln LN7 6BJ
P. R. Bampton
Affiliation:
Cotswold Pig Development Company Limited, Rothwell, Lincoln LN7 6BJ
Get access

Abstract

Past improvement programmes in pigs have concentrated on lean growth, and have relied on direct comparisons of contemporaries in a common environment. The new mixed model technology now allows comparisons across environments and generations, and, by utilizing all possible genetic relationships, more accurate prediction of genetic merit for traits of low heritability. In addition, breeding programme design will benefit from more precise estimation of genetic parameters. Principal benefits of the new technology are greater flexibility of structure of breeding programmes, and faster improvement of litter size. The consequence will be larger populations under selection with lower costs per unit of genetic improvement. For national improvement schemes using a high proportion of AI matings, central testing stations could become unnecessary. Main research priorities are the optimum family structure to balance selection and inbreeding, more efficient computing strategies for large numbers of traits, and the incorporation of single genes into predictions of merit. The new technology will be important for the exploitation of biological advances in manipulation of both reproduction and the genome.

Type
Breeding Technology
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 12: Animal Breeding Opportunities , 1988 , pp. 111 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avalos, E. and Smith, C. 1987. Genetic improvement of litter size in pigs. Animal Production 44: 153–164.Google Scholar
Bell, J. 1987. Nutrition and reproduction of Indonesian wild pigs. Report of study tour. University of Edinburgh, School of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Bichard, M. and Seidel, C.M. 1982. Selection for reproductive performance in maternal lines of pigs. Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Madrid 8: 565–569. Editorial Garsi, Madrid.Google Scholar
Bidanel, J.-P. 1988. [Productivity and genetic aspects of the prolific Chinese Meishan breed for intensive production}. Thesis, Institut National Agronomique, Paris-Grignon.Google Scholar
Bidanel, J.-P. and Legault, C. 1986. Experimental and prospective aspects of the utilisation of prolific Chinese breeds in Europe. Proceedings of the 37th Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Hungary.Google Scholar
Brem, G. 1988. Production of transgenic pigs and possible application to pig breeding. Proceedings of a Conference on Animal Breeding Opportunities, Durham. British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Christensen, A., Sorensen, D.A., Vestergaard, T. and Kemenade, P. van 1986. The Danish Pig Breeding Program: current system and future developments. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Nebraska 10: 143–148. University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Hagenbuch, P. and Hill, W.G. 1978. Effectiveness of sequential selection in pig improvement. Animal Production 27: 21–27.Google Scholar
Hill, W.G. and Meyer, K. 1988. Developments in methods for breeding value and parameter estimation in livestock. Proceedings of a Conference on Animal Breeding Opportunities, Durham, British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Kennedy, B.W. 1987. Genetic evaluation of swine using the Animal Model. Proceedings of the 38th Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Legault, C. and Gruand, J. 1976. [Improvement of prolificacy of sows by the formation of a hyperprolific line and its use in artificial insemination.] Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France 8: 201–206.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G., Smith, C., Makower, M. and Bird, P.J.W.N. 1982. An economic appraisal of pig improvement in Great Britain. 1. Genetic and production aspects. Animal Production 35: 215–224.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M.F. 1985. Selection for disease resistance in the pig. Pig News and Information 6: 277–280.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1964. The use of specialised sire and dam lines in selection for meat production. Animal Production 6: 337–344.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1976. Alternative forms of genetic controls. Animal Production 23: 403–412.Google Scholar
Southwood, O.I., Simpson, S.P., Curran, M.K. and Webb, A.J. 1988. Frequency of the halothane gene in British Landrace and Large White pigs. Animal Production 46: 97–102.Google Scholar
Sutherland, R.A., Webb, A.J., and King, J.W.B. 1984. Evaluation of overseas pig breeds using imported semen. 1. Growth and carcase performance. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 103: 562–570.Google Scholar
Sutherland, R.A., Webb, A.J. and King, J.W.B. 1985. A survey of world pig breeds and comparisons. Animal Breeding Abstracts 53: 1–22.Google Scholar
Toro, M.A., Silio, L., Rodrigañez, J. and Dobao, M.T. 1988. Inbreeding and family index selection for prolificacy in pigs. Animal Production 46: 79–85.Google Scholar
Walters, J.R. and Sellwood, R. 1988. Genetic resistance to K88 Escherichia coli - pig performance trials. Animal Production 46: 486–487. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Webb, A.J. 1988. Genetics of food intake in the pig. Proceedings of a Conference on Voluntary Food Intake in the Pig, University of Leeds. British Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Webb, A.J. and Curran, M.K. 1986. Selection regime by production system interaction in pig improvement: a review of possible causes and solutions. Livestock Production Science 14: 41–54.Google Scholar
Webb, A.J. and Simpson, S.P. 1986. Performance of British Landrace pigs selected for high and low incidence of halothane sensitivity. 2. Growth and carcass traits. Animal Production 43: 493–503.Google Scholar
Wray, N.R. 1988. Breeding value estimation for pigs in closed nucleus herds. Anim. Prod. 46: 486. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Xu, Z.-Y. 1985. On the biological and economic traits of ten Chinese indigenous breeds of pigs. Pig News and Information 6: 301–309.Google Scholar