Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:22:49.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic changes in ruminants: Historic trends and future prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Brian McGuirk*
Affiliation:
Genus plc, c/o 15 Murrayfield Drive, Edinburgh, EH12 6EB, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

The major ruminant species, dairy and beef cattle and sheep, represent a rather heterogeneous group as regards genetic improvement, which to a large extent reflects their respective breeding structures. In the UK, the beef cattle and sheep industries still span many different breeds, have small herds/flocks, and have been relatively unaffected by agribusiness investment, and are assumed to have a traditional pyramid breeding structure, in which progress is determined by a small number of breeders. Recording of production information, which to date has focussed on terminal sire characteristics, is relatively recent, and until the use of across herd evaluations, genetic progress was probably limited. However in recent years there have been gains in both growth and muscling. There is little evidence or concern for undesired consequences in commercial flocks, partly because of the extensive use of crossbreeding in these industries, which exploits both breed complementarity and heterosis.

By contrast, the dairy industry is now dominated by purebred Holsteins. Increasingly breeding activities are both global in scope and dominated by a small number of large breeding companies. Because most traits of interest are only expressed in the female, improvement programmes have continued to focus on progeny testing, with test daughters in many herds. Most recording schemes and promotional activities emphasise production and type traits. The dairy industry is also notable for the publication of bull progeny test results, so that top bulls can then be used as sires of the next generation of by all companies. These bull evaluations now extend to international rankings.

Data from the US indicates continuing genetic progress for production traits in the Holstein, particularly since the 1960s, by when progeny testing had been established, frozen semen widely used, and adequate statistical procedures in place for evaluating bulls. Genetic progress is also evident for type traits. There is now growing concern and evidence of undesirable genetic changes in fertility, disease incidence and overall stress, despite improved nutrition and general management. Altering this situation will require both the recording of such traits and the use of that information by breeding companies, especially in sire selection.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bichard, M. 1997. Genetic Evaluation Review. Milk Development Council, 1997.Google Scholar
McGuirk, B.J., Going, I. and Gilmour, A.R. 1998. The genetic evaluation of beef sires used for crossing with dairy cows in the UK. 1. Sire breed and non-genetic effects on calving survey traits. Animal Science 66: 3545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce, J.E., Veerkamp, R.F. and Simm, G. 1998. Expected correlated responses in health and fertility traits to selection for production in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 23: 383386.Google Scholar
Pryce, J.E., Nielsen, B.L., Veerkamp, R.F. and Simm, G. 1999. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science. 57: 193201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G.W., Banos, G. and Sander-Nielsen, U. 1999. Genetic correlation's among protein yield productive life and type traits in the United states and diseases other than mastitis in Denmark and Sweden. Journal of Dairy Science. 82: 13311338.Google Scholar
Rogers, G.W., Banos, G., Sander-Nielsen, U. and Philipsson, J. 1996. Genetic correlation's among somatic cell scores, productive life and type traits in the United States, and udder health measures in Denmark and Sweden. Bulletin No. 14, Proceedings of the Interbull Annual Meeting, Veldhoven, June 1996. Google Scholar
Royal, M.D., Darwash, .O. and Lamming, G.E. 1999. Trends in the fertility of dairy cows in the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science. p1.Google Scholar
Simm, G. (1998) Genetic Improvement of Cattle and Sheep. Farming Press, Ipswich.Google Scholar
Simm, G. and Dingwall, W. 1989. Selection indices for lean meat production in sheep. Livestock Production Science. 21: 223233.Google Scholar