Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:34:09.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of cost of access on consumption of environmental resources in mink

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

J. J. Cooper  and
G. Mason
J. J. Cooper
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13PS
G. Mason
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX13PS
Get access

Extract

Captive animals may suffer if they cannot perform important behaviour and changes to their housing will be most effective at improving welfare if the modifications provide opportunities to perform those behaviours which are most important to the animal concerned (Dawkins, 1983). One means of identifying these behavioural priorities is to place a cost on their performance, as animals persist with the performance of the most important behaviours in the face of rising cost but cease to perform less important behaviours (Dawkins, 1983). There is, however, considerable debate over how best to measure persistence or elasticity of demand (Dawkins, 1990; Mason et al., 1997a) in terms of maximizing both their internal and external validity. To produce results with maximal internal validity it is important to follow the guidelines for using consumer demand theory presented by Mason et al., (1997b): that animals are tested in closed economies; that they are free to control their behavioural bout lengths; that resource use and cost must covary; and that the animals perceive the imposed cost to be equivalent for all resources.

Type
Poster abstracts
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 20: Animal Choices , 1997 , pp. 129 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cooper, J. J. and Appleby, M. C. 1995. Nesting behaviour of hens: effects of experience on motivation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 283–295.Google Scholar
Dawkins, M. S. 1983. Battery hens name their price: consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological ‘needs’. Animal Behaviour 31: 1195–1205.Google Scholar
Dawkins, M. S. 1990. From an animal’s point of view; motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behaviour and Brain Science 13:1–61.Google Scholar
Mason, G. M., Cooper, J. J. and Garner, J. 1997a. Models of motivational decision making and how they effect the experimental assessment of motivational priorities. In Animal choices (ed. Forbes, J. M., Lawrence, T. L. J., Rodway, R. G. and Varley, M. A.), British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 20, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
Mason, G. M., Garner, J. and McFarland, D. M. 1997b. A demanding task; using economic techniques to assess animal priorties. Animal Behaviour In press.Google Scholar
Matthews, L. R. and Ladewig, J. 1994. Environmental requirements of pigs measured by behavioural demand functions. Animal Behaviour 47: 713–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, C. M. and Nicol, C. J. 1995. Changes in mean patterning by mice measure the cost imposed by natural obstacles. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43: 291–300.Google Scholar