Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T08:05:17.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlations between food intake in young bulls and production, fertility and health disorders in lactating dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

R. Wassmuth ,
D. Boelling  and
J. Jensen
R. Wassmuth
Affiliation:
Research Centre Foulum, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
D. Boelling
Affiliation:
Research Centre Foulum, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
J. Jensen
Affiliation:
Research Centre Foulum, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Disease incidence in dairy cattle is to be reduced for animal welfare and economical reasons. This should be achieved not only by improvement of management but preferably also by genetic means. This study looks at the possibility of decreasing disease incidence in first lactation cows by increasing food intake. The latter is not measured on the cows directly but on young bulls during their performance test. Data consisted of 2203 Danish Red, 4527 Danish Black and White and 1022 Danish Jersey potential AI-bulls and 56 494 Danish Red, 264107 Danish Black and White and 57 661 Danish Jersey first lactation cows. Measures of food intake were provided by two Danish performance test stations. Information on incidence of mastitis, retained placenta, metritis, sole ulcer and ketosis as well as calving interval and energy corrected milk yield of first lactation cows was based on data extracted from the national data base in Denmark. Genetic (co)variances were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood. Heritability estimates of disease incidence and calving interval were low, ranging from <0.01 to 0.13 depending on breed. Heritability estimates of energy corrected milk yield were in the range of 0.28 to 0.33. In all breeds, an unfavourable genetic relationship between milk yield and disease incidence was found, while genetic correlations between food intake and ketosis were favourable, ranging between -0.03 and -0.25. Fertility disorders had an inconsistent correlation with food intake traits across breeds. Food intake of bulls could be included in the selection process in order to avoid nutrition-related disorders like ketosis.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 24: Metabolic stress in dairy cows , 1999 , pp. 153 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, O. 1990. Health control. Summary of the annual report 1990, National Committee on Danish Cattle Husbandry, p. 7.Google Scholar
Andersen, O. 1991. Health control. Summary of the annual report 1991, National Committee on Danish Cattle Husbandry, p. 9.Google Scholar
Arendonk, J. A. M. van, Nieuwhof, G. J., Vos, H. and Korver, S. 1991. Genetic aspects of food intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifers. Livestock Production Science 29:263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergsten, C. 1995. Management and nutritional effects on foot health in dairy cows. Proceedings of the 46th meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Prague.Google Scholar
Butler, W. R. and Smith, R. D. 1989. Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 72:767–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dempster, E.R. and Lerner, I. M. 1950. Heritability of threshold characters. Genetics 35:212–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingvartsen, K. L., Andersen, H. R. and Foldager, J. 1986. [Food intake of growing cattle.] Beretning fra Statene Husdyrbrugsforsøg, 614.Google Scholar
Interbull. 1996. Sire evaluation procedures for non-dairy-production and growth and beef production traits practised in various countries 1996. International Bull Evaluation Service, bulletin no. 13.Google Scholar
Jensen, J., Mäntysaari, E. A., Madsen, P. and Thompson, R. 1996-97. Residual maximum likelihood estimation of (co)variance components in multivariate mixed models using average information. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics 49:215–236.Google Scholar
Kirchgessner, M. 1981. Tierernährung. 5., neubearbeitete Auflage. DLG-Verlag — Frankfurt (Main), pp. 40–52.Google Scholar
Ljøkjel, K., Klemetsdal, G., Frestløkken, E. and Ropstad, E. 1995. The effect of energy balance on ovarian activity in a herd of Norwegian cattle. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 36: 533–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, P., Andersen, B. B. and Jensen, J. 1990. Food intake capacity in performance test index for dairy bulls. Proceedings of the fourth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Edinburgh, vol. 14, pp. 151–154.Google Scholar
Nieuwhof, G. J., Arendonk, J. A. M. van, Vos, H. and Korver, S. 1992. Genetic relationships between food intake, efficiency and production traits in growing bulls, growing heifers and lactating heifers. Livestock Production Science 32: 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østerås, O. and Tørud, E. 1996. [Health rules 1995, Committee of the Health Service for Cattle.] Norsk Veterinærtidsskrift 108: 395–409.Google Scholar
Pryce, J.E., Veerkamp, R. F., Thompson, R., Hill, W. G. and Simm, G. 1997. Genetic aspects of common health disorders and measures of fertility in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Animal Science 65:353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, K.-H. 1997. [Health and fertility in dairy cows, service contract for herd inspection and health care.] Züchtungskunde 69:464–470.Google Scholar
Sjaunja, L. O., Baevre, B., Junkkarinen, L., Pedersen, J. and Setala, J. 1990. A Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula. The 27th session of the ICRPMA, 2-6 July, Paris.Google Scholar
Steine, T. 1996. Possibilities and needs for selection against metabolic diseases in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the international workshop on genetic improvement of functional traits in cattle. Gembloux, Belgium. Interbull bulletin no. 12, pp. 52–55.Google Scholar
Uribe, H. A., Kennedy, B. W., Martin, S. W. and Kelton, D. F. 1995. Genetic parameters for common health disorders of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78:421–430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1995. Genotype by environment interaction — experience from Langhill. Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J., Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), pp. 59–66. British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 19.Google Scholar
Wassmuth, R. 1998. [Food intake of bulls measured at performance test stations as an indicator for health in dairy cattle.] Postdoctoral thesis, University of Göttingen, Germany.Google Scholar
Wentink, G. H., Rutten, V. P. M. G. and Wensing, Th. 1996. Nutrition, metabolic diseases and immunity in dairy cows. Proceedings of the 19th congress of the World Association for Buiatrics, Edinburgh, 8 -12 July, vol 2, pp. 337–33.Google Scholar