Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:06:00.355Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

One century of genetic changes in pigs and the future needs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Jan W.M. Merks*
Affiliation:
IPG, Institute for Pig Genetics B.V., P.O. Box 43, 6640 AA Beuningen, the Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Breeding programmes and improved knowledge of genetics have resulted in gradually increased genetic changes in pigs. In this paper the genetic changes in the European pig during the last century are analysed and compared with societal needs for the following decades. Dutch data are used to support the general trend in Europe and results of an EC project on breeding and society are used to identify societal needs.

Genetic changes in pigs started early this century, mainly in Northern Europe, by the gradual set up of local and regional breeding programmes. In the first 60 years the goal of these programmes was focussed only on leanness and feed efficiency. However, type, leg quality and breed characteristics were of utmost importance in these years for some breeding programmes. During these decades the genetic changes were negligible for reproduction traits. Progress was achieved especially for breed characteristics like type and colour and later also backfat thickness, daily gain and consequently improved feed efficiency.

With the introduction of crosses in the early 60's, specialisation in dam and sire lines but moreover in breeding programmes arose in the pig industry. This specialisation resulted rapidly in increased genetic changes, more breeds and/or lines and breeding goals that supported efficient lean meat production systems. Especially in the sire lines, this specialisation resulted in increased progress for daily gain, backfat thickness and feed efficiency. Improved knowledge of genetics increased genetic changes in leanness and feed efficiency during the last few decades, but at the same time attention could be and was paid to fertility and vitality. During the last decade most European pig breeding programmes realised anual genetic progress for daily gain of +20 g/day, lean meat % of +0.5% and litter size of +0.2 piglet/litter. Molecular genetics does not enable more genetic change for these traits, but does so especially for expensive or difficult to measure traits, e.g. meat quality, health and longevity. In commercial pig breeding programmes selection limits have not been reached yet. Nevertheless, there are experimental results that indicate unintended side effects of the present breeding goals.

Next to changes in breeding possibilities, the societal needs have also changed. During the first 80–90 years of the century, pig producers were aiming at production of lean meat at low(er) prices. In this period low prices were more important than quality and/or welfare of the pigs. Nowadays, diversification in consumers' needs is growing and quality of the product (including production circumstances) is important in Western Europe. The market for pork is changing from a market of producers into a market of (potential) buyers. Clearly, the success of any pig breeding programme next century will be judged by the consumer. Where a newly bred, or genetically modified, variety of animal fails to provide something people are prepared to buy, the breeding programme will be judged a failure. In this respect ethical issues are also becoming more important. Modern breeding techniques can threaten animal welfare; a very fast increase in one or a few traits can easily result in an insufficient increase or adaptation of the organs and skeleton. Animal integrety is another important issue, especially related to genetically modified animals. Clearly, the relationship between animal and human interests is central to any view.

From the analysis of genetic changes in pigs and the present and foreseen changes in market demands, it may be concluded that the pig breeding programmes were very successful; but they will have to change their goals. Less emphasis will be needed on low cost price and more emphasis on product quality, biodiversity and well balanced genetic changes for economically important traits.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, S., Pedersen, B. and Vernersen, A. 1998. Impact of nucleus selection at production level 6th WCGALP, Australia , 23: 515518 Google Scholar
Christiansen, S.B. and Sandoe, P. 1999. Ethical perspectives on breeding and biotechnology. In: The future developments in farm animal breeding and reproduction and their ethical, legal and consumer implications. A.N., Neeteson (ed.): pp. 3751.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G.E. 1952. Inbred lines for heterosis tests? in Gowen, J.W. (ed.) Heterosis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa (USA), pp 330351 Google Scholar
Dickerson, G.E. 1974. Evaluation and utilization of breed differences. In: Proceedings of the working symposium on breed evaluation and crossing with farm animals. Zeist, September 1974.Google Scholar
Eissen, J.J., Apeldoorn, E.J., Kanis, E., Verstegen, M.W.A. and De Greef, K.H. 1999. The importance of a high feed intake during lactation of primiparous sows nursing large litters. Submitted to Journal of Animal Science. Google Scholar
Fujii, J., Otsu, K. and De Zozzato, F. 1991. Identification of a mutation in porcine syanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253: 448451.Google Scholar
Grøn Pedersen, O. 1997. Danbred, Danish pig breeding in 100 years – an overview. In: Danish pig breeding, 100 years Anniversary Seminar. Herning, 23 January 1997. Google Scholar
Haley, C.S., Avalos, E. and Smith, C. 1986. A review of selection for reproductive performance in the pig. 37th EAAP, BudapestGoogle Scholar
Hanenberg, E.H.A.T., Knol, E.F. and Merks, J.W.M. 1999. Estimates of genetic parameters for reproduction traits at different parities in Dutch Landrace pigs, 50th EAAP meeting, Zürich Google Scholar
Johnson, R.K., Nielsen, M.K. and Casey, D.S. 1999. Responses of ovulation rate, embryonal survival and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size. Journal of Animal Science 77: 541557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knap, P.W., 1990. Pig Herdbook breeding in the Netherlands, 3, dam line breeding, World Review of Animal Production Vol. XXV 3 : 5964 Google Scholar
Knol, E. 1998. Genetic parameters of litter mortality and 6 related characteristics. Abstract ADSA and ASAS meeting, Denver. Google Scholar
Meuwissen, Th. 1998. Risk management and the definition of breeding objectives. 6th WCGALP, Australia 25: 347354 Google Scholar
Merks, J.W.M. and Hanenberg, E.H.A.T. 1998. Optimal selection strategy for crossbred performance in commercial pig breeding programmes, 6th WCGALP, Australia, 23: 575578 Google Scholar
Moav, R. 1966. Specialized sire and dam lines. Animal Production 8: 193, 203 and 365Google Scholar
Neeteson, A.M., Merks, J.W.M., Bagnato, A., Finocchiaro, R., Sandoe, P., Christiansen, S., Noiville, C. and Van Genderen, A., 1999. The future developments in farm animal breeding and reproduction and their ethical, legal and consumer implications. Report of project BIO4 – CT 98 – 0055, 128 pages Google Scholar
Rothschild, M.F. 1998. Identification of quantitative trait loci and interesting candidate genes in the pig: progress and prospects. 6th WCGALP, Australia, 26: 403409 Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1964. The use of specialised sire and dam lines in selection for meat production. Animal Production 6 : 337 Google Scholar
Tribout, T., Bidanel, J.P., Ducos, A. and Garreau, H. 1998. Continuous genetic evaluation of farm and station tested pigs for production and reproduction traits in France, 6th WCGALP, Australia 23: 491494 Google Scholar
Van Genderen, A. and De Vriend, H. 1999. Farm animal breeding and the consumer. In: The future developments in farm animal breeding and reproduction and their ethical, legal and consumer implications, Neeteson, A.N. (e.d.) page 6684 Google Scholar
Visscher, P.M. and Haley, C.S. 1998. Strategies for marker-assisted selection in pig breeding programmes, 6th WCGALP, Australia 23: 503510 Google Scholar