Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:29:53.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional needs of cattle in the hills and uplands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A. J. F. Russel  and
P. J. Broadbent
A. J. F. Russel
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PY
P. J. Broadbent
Affiliation:
North of Scotland College of Agriculture, 581 King St., Aberdeen
Get access

Abstract

Systems of management of beef cows in the hills and uplands seek to make use of the cow's ability to utilise body tissue to maintain production during periods of undernutrition in winter and to replenish body reserves from relatively inexpensive summer grazing.

In spring-calving cows, the periods of winter undernutrition occur during late pregnancy and the early months of lactation. On upland farms, cows with adequate body reserves (condition score 3.5) at the beginning of winter, fed less than 50 MJ ME per day during the final 3 months of gestation and 70 MJ ME per day during the first 2 months of lactation, will lose about 1.5 units of body condition but such a regime will not necessarily result in biologically significant production penalties. Fertilised ryegrass swards maintained at 8 cm sward surface height during the grazing season will support levels of milk production of around 11 kg per day, calf growth rates of the order of 1.2 kg per day and allow full recovery of cow body weight and condition. In hill herds, the magnitude of losses in weight and condition over winter must be restricted to the extent of the recovery which the quality of summer grazing will support.

Similar considerations apply in autumn-calving herds, where the greater part or all of lactation coincides with the period of winter feeding. Cows calving at a body condition score of 3.0 can be fed 75 MJ ME per day from before to one month after mating without prejudicing reproductive performance, and 60-65 MJ ME per day from then until turnout. Where good quality pasture is available, milk production will increase from around 5 to more than 9 kg per day following turnout, calf performance will be enhanced by delaying weaning and cows will recover in full the weight and condition lost during winter. In the hill situation, calves may require to be weaned at turnout if full cow recovery is to be achieved.

Studies on the nutrition of the weaned suckled calf indicate that a policy of feeding weaned calves inexpensively during winter to gain between 0.3 and 0.5 kg per day may constitute a viable alternative to the traditional practice of selling calves in the autumn. Such animals will achieve significantly higher growth rates at pasture in the following summer than calves fed more generously and gaining weight more rapidly during winter.

On some hill farms where opportunities for the conservation of winter fodder are limited but where there is plentiful summer grazing, a system of June calving followed by a short lactation, and in which calves are only very moderately fed over winter, merits consideration.

The areas in which further research is most urgently required to effect significant improvements in efficiency are those concerned with the relationship between nutrition and reproductive efficiency and the induction of twinning in cows.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 10: Hill and Upland Livestock Production , 1985 , pp. 55 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Ball, C., Broadbent, P. J. and Dodsworth, T. L. 1971. Energy and protein supplements for straw-based winter diets for suckler cows. Anim. Prod. 13: 237–243.Google Scholar
Broadbent, P. J. 1981. Cattle production in the hills and uplands. In The Effective Use of Forage and Animal Resources in the Hills and Uplands (ed. Frame, J.). Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc. No. 12, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. M., Broadbent, P. J. and Topps, J. H. 1984. A model of the energy system of lactating and pregnant cows. Anim. Prod. 38: 351–362.Google Scholar
Chapple, D. G. 1981. Winter nutrition of the spring-calving suckler cow. In The Effective Use of Forage and Animal Resources in the Hills and Uplands (ed. Frame, J.). Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc. No. 12, pp. 176–177.Google Scholar
Grant, S. A., Suckling, D. E., Smith, H. K., Torvell, L., Forbes, T. D. A. and Hodgson, J. 1985. Comparative studies of diet selection by sheep and cattle: the hill grasslands. J. Ecol. 73: In press.Google Scholar
Hight, G. K. 1966. The effects of undernutrition in late pregnancy on beef cattle production. N.Z. J. agric. Res. 9: 479–490.Google Scholar
Hight, G. K. 1968a. Plane of nutrition effects in late pregnancy and during lactation on beef cows and their calves to weaning. N.Z. J. agric. Res. 11: 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hight, G. K. 1968b. A comparison of the effects of three nutritional levels in late pregnancy on beef cows and their calves. N.Z. J. agric. Res. 11: 477–486.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Eadie, J. 1986. Vegetation resources and animal nutrition in hill areas: agricultural and environmental implications. Proc. Hill Land Symposium, Galway (in press).Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. and Grant, Sheila A. 1981. Grazing animals and forage resources in the hills and uplands. In The Effective Use of Forage and Animal Resources in the Hills and Uplands (ed. Frame, J.). Occ. Symp. Br. Grassld Soc. No. 12, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J., Peart, J. N., Russel, A. J. F., Whitelaw, A. and Macdonald, A. J. 1980. The influence of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of spring-calving suckler cows and their calves. Anim. Prod. 30: 315–325.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Edwards, R. A., Somerville, S. H. and Jolly, G. M. 1979. The effect of plane of nutrition in early lactation on the performance of beef cows. Anim. Prod. 29: 293–303.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A. and Somerville, S. H. 1976. Condition scoring of cattle. Bull. E. Scotl. Coll. Agric., No. 6.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Tech. Bull. No. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1983. Sheep Yearbook. MLC, Bletchley.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1984. Beef Yearbook. MLC, Bletchley.Google Scholar
Powell, T. L. and Matravers, C. 1975. Feeding levels in late pregnancy and early lactation for spring calving single suckler cows. Exptl Husbandry 29: 29–37.Google Scholar
Riley, Gillian M. and Peters, A. R. 1981. Ovarian activity in post partum beef cows. Anim. Prod. 32: 371 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. 1981. Beef cattle research. Hill Farming Research Organisation Biennial Report 1979-81, pp. 145–167.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Peart, J. N., Eadie, J., Macdonald, A. J. and White, I. R. 1979. The effect of energy intake during late pregnancy on the production from two genotypes of suckler cow. Anim. Prod. 28: 309–327.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. and Wright, I. A. 1983. Factors affecting maintenance requirements of beef cows. Anim. Prod. 37: 329–334.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Wright, I. A., Hodgson, J. and Hunter, E. A. 1986. Factors affecting production from grazing beef cows and calves. Proc. Hill Land Symposium, Galway (in press).Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Wright, I. A. and Hunter, E. A. 1985. The performance of single- and twin-reared suckled calves. In Hill and Upland Livestock Production (ed. Maxwell, T. J. and Gunn, R. G.). Occ. Publ. Br. Soc. Anim. Prod. No. 10.Google Scholar
Somerville, S. H., Lowman, B. G., Edwards, R. A. and Jolly, G. 1983. A study of the relationship between plane of nutrition during lactation and certain production characteristics in autumn-calving suckler cows. Anim. Prod. 37: 353–363.Google Scholar
Sreenan, J. M. 1981. Biotechnical measures for improvement of fertility in cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 8: 215–231.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A. and Russel, A. J. F. 1984. Partition of fat, body composition and body condition score in mature cows. Anim. Prod. 38: 23–32.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Russel, A. J. F. and Hunter, E. A. 1983. Nutrition and performance of weaned suckled calves. Hill Farming Research Organisation Biennial Report 1982-83, pp. 153–158.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Russel, A. J. F. and Hunter, E. A. 1984. Factors affecting the performance of weaned suckled calves at pasture. Anim. Prod. 36: 315 (Abstr.).Google Scholar