Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:56:40.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving meat quality: the blueprint approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. C. Warkup
C. C. Warkup
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, PO Box 44, Winterhill House, Snowdon Drive, Milton Keynes
Get access

Abstract

Consumer demand for meat is strongly influenced by sensory aspects of meat quality, particularly visual appeal and eating quality. One of the most important of these traits is tenderness which is notoriously complex in origin and hence difficult to control. Potential interactions between diet, pre-slaughter handling, chill rate, muscle shortening during chilling and, therefore, toughness are presented to illustrate the complexity of controlling the trait. The final eating quality result is far from predictable. The Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) has identified the enhancement of eating quality of beef and pork as important objectives for industry. It has produced and tested blueprint specifications which aim to summarize the ‘best state of the art’ regarding eating quality at each stage of the production and processing chain. The strengths and weaknesses of this approach are discussed. The standard blueprint specification for pork produced an improvement in tenderness of 0.6 scale points (P<0.001, scale = 1 to 8) over random retail purchases of pork chops and a significant reduction in variance. However, considerable residual variation remains, providing the opportunity for greater improvements to be made in the future.

Type
Research Article
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 17: Safety and Quality of Food from Animals , January 1993 , pp. 63 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addis, P. B., Nelson, D. A., Ma, R. T. I. and Burroughs, J. R. 1974. Blood enzymes in relation to porcine muscle properties. Journal of Animal Science 38: 279–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton-Gade, P. A. 1988. Factors affecting the sensory properties of pork. In Meat science, milk science and technology (ed. Cross, H. R. and Overby, A. J.). Elsevier, London.Google Scholar
Currie, R. W. and Wolfe, F. H. 1979. Relationships between pH fall and initiation of isotonic contraction in post-mortem beef muscle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59: 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrie, R. A. 1985. Meat science, 4th ed. Pergammon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Marsh, B. B. 1983. Effects of early post-mortem muscle pH and temperature on meat tenderness. Proceedings of the reciprocal meat conference vol. 36, p113.Google Scholar
Marsh, B. B. and Leet, N. G. 1966. Studies on meat tenderness. III. The effects of cold shortening on meat tenderness. Journal of Food Science 31: 450–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, B. B., Ringkob, T. P., Russel, R. L., Swartz, D. R. and Pagel, L. A. 1987. Effects of early post-mortem glycolytic rate on beef tenderness. Meat Science 5: 479–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission. 1991. Meat and Livestock Commission Corporate Plan 1991–1994. MLC, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Moller, A. J. and Vestergaard, T. 1986. Effect of delay time before chilling on toughness in pork with high or low initial pH. Meat Science 19: 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, M. B. and Lynch, G. P. 1988. Biochemical, histochemical and palatability charcteristics of young lambs as affected by diet and electrical stimulation. Journal of Animal Science 66: 1955–1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tornberg, E. and Larsson, G. 1986. The influence of temperature on the course of rigor and ageing in two beef muscles. Proceedings of the thirty-second European meeting of meat research workers, Belgium.Google Scholar