Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:11:17.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herd management effects on compositional quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

F. H. Dodd*
Affiliation:
National institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Get access

Extract

Lactation depends on milk secretion and the storage of the accumulating milk, followed by milk ejection and effective milk removal during milking. Environmental and disease factors may affect each of these stages independently and, thus, alter the milk composition. With normal milking intervals, the secretion of each of the milk constituents is continuous and linear with time. Subsequently, changes in milk composition occur during storage in the udder, mainly through the free movement of water between milk and blood and as a consequence of maintaining their osmotic equilibrium. The changes in composition are greatest in infected glands. The composition of milk varies in different parts of the udder: the fat content is much lower in the milk in the udder and teat sinuses. Following milk ejection, 10 to 20% of the milk is retained and cannot be removed by milking; the fat content of this residual milk will usually exceed 150 g/kg. The dynamics of these changes are complex and, whilst they may bring about large alterations in the composition of the milk obtained at individual milkings, their effect over longer periods is small. Thus, although incomplete milking, changing the milking intervals and increasing the frequency of milking will cause large fluctuations in the composition of milk at individual milkings, their longer-term effects are minor. The main effect of high levels of udder disease will be to reduce the lactose content but the serum protein level will increase and changes will occur in the concentrations of potassium, sodium and chloride ions. The design of milking equipment and the hygiene during farm storage of milk may materially alter the quality of milk for processing, because of lipolysis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, G. L., Clough, P. A. and Dodd, F. H. 1955. The rate of secretion of milk and fat. J. Dairy Res. 22: 2236.Google Scholar
Claesson, O., Hansson, A., Gustafsson, N. and Brännäng, E. 1959. Studies of monozygous cattle twins. XVII. Once-a-day milking compared with twice-a-day milking. Acta Agric, scand. 9: 3858.Google Scholar
Elliott, Gillian M. 1959. The effect on milk yield of the length of milking intervals used in twice a day milking, twice and three times a day milking and incomplete milking. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 21: 481490.Google Scholar
Elliott, Gillian M., Dodd, F. H. and Brumby, P. J. 1960. Variations in the rate of milk secretion in milking intervals of 2-24 hours. J. Dairy Res. 27: 293308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, A., Claesson, O., Brännäng, E. and Gustafsson, N. 1958. Studies on monzygous cattle twins. XVI. Milking intervals in relation to yield of milk and milk constituents. Acta Agric, scand. 8: 296318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, R. J. T. 1982. Mastitis: its effect on milk yield, composition and quality. Proc. Semin. Milk Prod. Past., Ruakura Res. Stn, Hamilton.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. 1952. Studies on udder evacuation in dairy cows. II. The amount and composition of the residual milk after normal milkings. Acta Agric, scand. 2: 82102.Google Scholar
Koshi, J. H. and Petersen, W. E. 1954. The effect of the length of intervals between milking on the milk and butterfat production. J. Dairy Sci. 37: 673 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. and Brumby, P. J. 1956. Milk production and interval between milking. Nature, Lond. 178: 799.Google Scholar
Ormiston, E. E., Spahr, S. L., Touchberry, R. W. and Albright, J. L. 1967. Effects of milking at unequal intervals for a complete lactation on milk yield and composition. J. Dairy Sci. 50: 15971605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, G. H. and Trimberger, G. W. 1963. Effect of unequal milking intervals on lactation milk, milk fat, and total solids production of cows. J. Dairy Sci. 46: 1921.Google Scholar
Thiel, C. C. and Dodd, F. H. 1979. Machine Milking, Tech. Bull. 1. Revised ed., p. 184. National Institute for Research in Dairying, Reading.Google Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F. and Dodd, F. H. 1965a. The relationship in the cow between the osmotic pressure of milk and of blood. J. Dairy Res. 32: 7988.Google Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F. and Dodd, F. H. 1965b. The effect of incomplete milking or of an extended milking interval on the yield and composition of cow's milk. J. Dairy Res. 32: 237248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F., Dodd, F. H. and Griffin, T. K. 1966?. The effect of varying the interval between milkings on milk secretion. J. Dairy Res. 33: 161176.Google Scholar
Wheelock, J. V., Rook, J. A. F., Neave, F. K. and Dodd, F. H. 1966b. The effect of bacterial infections of the udder on the yield and composition of cow's milk. J. Dairy Res. 33: 199215.Google Scholar
Woodward, T. E., Hotis, R. P. and Graves, R. R. 1936. Incomplete milking in relation to milk production and udder troubles in dairy cows. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric, No. 522.Google Scholar