Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T10:02:29.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting mutual grooming and play behaviour in a group of domestic horses (Equus caballus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

M. Hannan ,
I. Draganova  and
L. Dumbell
M. Hannan
Affiliation:
Hartpury College, The University of the West of England, Hartpury, Gloucester, GL19 3BE, UK Email: [email protected].
I. Draganova
Affiliation:
Hartpury College, The University of the West of England, Hartpury, Gloucester, GL19 3BE, UK Email: [email protected].
L. Dumbell
Affiliation:
Hartpury College, The University of the West of England, Hartpury, Gloucester, GL19 3BE, UK Email: [email protected].
Get access

Extract

Horses are a gregarious species with strong social bonds between individuals and when under free-ranging conditions, form family bands or herds (Tyler, 1979; Wells and Goldschmidt-Rothschild, 1979). Each herd contains small bands of roughly 3 adult horses (1 stallion, 2-3 mares) plus their most recent offspring (Linklater et al., 1999). There are also bachelor groups composed of males that are either too young for their own harems, or can no longer defend the harems they once had (Waring, 1983). As horses live in groups they have evolved a complex behaviour repertoire in order to communicate. Mutual grooming and play are two such behaviours that have been widely studied in both domestic and feral horses, however the results from studies on their influencing factors have been contradictory. Mutual grooming has the obvious function of coat care and parasite removal; moreover, it has also been implicated in forming and maintaining bonds between horses in a herd (Waring, 1983).

Type
Posters
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 35: Applying Equine Science: Research into Business , 2006 , pp. 193 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bekoff, M. 1976. Animal play, problems and perspectives. Perspective Ethology. 2: 165–188.Google Scholar
Boyd, L.E., Carbonaro, D.A. and Houpt, K.A. 1988. The 24-hour time budget of Przewalski horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 21: 1–2, 5-17.Google Scholar
Crowell-Davis, S.L., Houpt, K.A. and Kane, L. 1987. Play Development in welsh Pony (Equus caballus) Foals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 18: 119–130.Google Scholar
Dierendonck, M.C. van, Sigurjónsdóttir, H., Colenbrander, B. and Thorhallsdóttir, A.G. 2004. Differences in social behaviour between late pregnant, post-partum and barren mares in a herd of Icelandic horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 89: 3–4, 283-297.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T.M., Newberry, R.C., Špinka, M. and Cloutier, S. 2002. Effects of early play experience of play behaviour of piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 79: 3, 221–231.Google Scholar
Keiper, R.R. 1988. Social Interactions of the Przewalski Horse (Equus przewalskii Poliakov, 1881) Herd at the Munich Zoo. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 21: 21-2. 89–97.Google Scholar
Kimura, R. 1998. Mutual grooming and preferred associate relationships in a band of free-ranging horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 59: 4, 265–276.Google Scholar
Lehner, P.N. 1998. Handbook of Ethological Methods. 2nd edition. CUP, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Linklater, W.L.; Cameron, E.Z.; Minot, E.O. and Stafford, K.J. 1999. Stallion harassment and the mating systems of horses. Animal Behaviour. 58: 295–306.Google Scholar
Martin, P. and Bateson, P. 1993. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. 2nd edition. CUP, Cambridge, England.Google Scholar
Sigurjónsdóttir, H. Dierendonck, M.C. van, Snorrason, S. and Thorhallsdóttir, A.G. 2003. Social relationships in a group of horses without a mature stallion. Behaviour. 140: 6, 783–804.Google Scholar
Tyler, S. 1972. The behaviour and organisation of the New Forest ponies. Animal Behaviour Monograph. 5: 85–196.Google Scholar
Waring, G.H. 1983. Horse Behaviour: the Behavioural Traits and Adaptations of Domestic and Wild Horses, Including Ponies. Noyes Publications, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
Weeks, J.W., Crowell-Davis, S.L., Caudle, A.B. and Heusner, G.L. 2000. Aggression and social spacing in light horse (Equus caballus) mares and foals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 68: 4, 329–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, S.M. and Goldschmidt-Rothschild, B. 1979. Social Behaviour and Relationships in a Herd of Camargue Horses. Z. Tierpsychol. 49: 363–380.Google Scholar