No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Dietary choices assessed by pre- and post-grazing tests on rangeland vegetation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2018
Extract
Dietary choices of herbivores on rangeland complex vegetation are not easy to assess and give more or less biased results despite dedicated work (Holecheck et al., 1982; McInnis et al., 1983). Direct methods, such as oesophageal fistulas and direct observations can only be used in a limited range of conditions. Their negative effect on animal welfare emphasizes the need for non-injurious and nonstressful methods.
- Type
- Poster abstracts
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1997
References
Daget, P. and Poissonet, J.
1971. Une méthode d’analyse phytologique des prairies — criteres d’application.
Annales Agronomiques
22:
5–41.Google Scholar
Heady, H. F.
1957. The measurement and value of plant height in the study of herbaceous vegetation.
Ecology
38:
313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holecheck, J. L., Vavra, M. and Pieper, R. D.
1982. Botanical composition determination of range herbivore diets: a review.
Journal of Range Management
35:
306–309.Google Scholar
Levy, E. B. and Madden, E. A.
1933. The point method for pasture analysis. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture
46: 267–275.Google Scholar
McInnis, M. L., Vavra, M. and Krueger W. C.,
1983. A comparison of four methods used to determine the diets of large herbivores.
Journal of Range Management
36:
302–306.Google Scholar
Pluvinage, J. and Molenat, G.
1993. Un système pastoral articule sur l’agriculture. L’élevage ovin en Crau. Proceedings of the fourth international rangeland congress vol. 2, pp. 826–828.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user’s guide, release 6.03 edition. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar