Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T06:43:30.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

4.2 Forage Protein and the Performance and Health of the Dairy Cow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

A. J. F. Webster ,
I. P. Simmons  and
M. A. Kitcherside
A. J. F. Webster
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Bristol
I. P. Simmons
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Bristol
M. A. Kitcherside
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Bristol
Get access

Extract

In nutrition, as in any other branch of quantitative applied science, two essential criteria must be met before research findings can be transferred successfully into practice. (1) The fundamental concepts must be essentially sound and (2) the predictions emerging from that conceptually sound system must, in a practical situation, constitute a useful increase in accuracy. The new method proposed by the Agricultural Research Council (ARC, 1980) for expressing protein requirements and the value of feeds for ruminants is undoubtedly an enormous improvement in a conceptual sense on ARC (1965). Indeed, the division of protein inputs into rumen degradable nitrogen (RDN) and undegradable dietary nitrogen (UDN) cannot be faulted since it is the best possible simple description of what happens. Even the decision to retain the concept of crude protein (N x 6.25) and refer therefore to RDP and UDP is harmless. The new ARC protein system therefore fulfils the first criterion for successful practical application. The second criterion can only be fulfilled if ARC (1980) accurately describes both the requirements of animals and the nutritive value of feeds in terms of RDP and UDP. In the case of dairy cows, this is open to considerable doubt.

Type
4. The Nitrogen Needs of Ruminants and the Possible Contribution from Forages
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 6: Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production , 1982 , pp. 89 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1965. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Agricultural Research Council, London.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. 2nd ed. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal.Google Scholar
Barry, T. N. 1976. The effectiveness of formaldehyde treatment in protecting dietary protein from rumen microbial degradation. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35: 221–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J., Cammell, S. B. and Harrison, D. G. 1977. The digestion by sheep of silages made with or without the addition of formaldehyde. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finco, D. R., Thrall, D. E. and Duncan, J. R. 1979. The Urinary System. In Canine Medicine (ed. Catcott, E. J.), pp. 419–500. Am. Vet. Publ. Inc., Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Folman, Y., Neumark, H., Kaim, M. and Kaufmann, W. 1981. Performance, rumen and blood metabolites in high-yielding cows fed various protein percents and protected soybean. J. Dairy Sci. 64: 759–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagemeister, H., Lüpping, W. and Kaufmann, W. 1980. Microbial protein synthesis and digestion in the high-yielding dairy cow. In Recent advances in Animal Nutrition, 1980 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 67–84. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1976. Nutrient Allowances and Composition of Feedingstuffs for Ruminants. ADAS Advisory Paper No. LGR 21.Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. and Ørskov, E. R. 1977. A study of the artificial fibre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 88: 645–657.Google Scholar
Mohamed, O. E. and Smith, R. H. 1977. Measurement of protein degradation in the rumen. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 36: 152A.Google ScholarPubMed
Morrison, F. B. 1954. Feeds and feeding. 21st ed. Morrison Publ. Co., Clinton, Iowa.Google Scholar
Morrow, L. L., Tumbleson, M. E., Kintner, L. D., Pfander, W. H. and Preston, R. L. 1973. Laminitis in lambs injected with lactic acid. Am. J. vet. Res. 34: 1305–1307.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 92: 499–523.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and Mehrez, A. Z. 1977. Estimation of extent of protein degradation from basal feeds in the rumen of sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 36: 78 A.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Reid, G. W. and McDonald, I. 1981. The effects of protein degradability and food intake on milk yield and composition in cows in early lactation. Br. J. Nutr. 45: 547–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Payne, J. M. 1976. The practical use of the metabolic profile test. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Production Disease in Farm Animals, pp. 45-49. Wageningen.Google Scholar
Peterse, D. J. 1979. Nutrition as a possible factor in the pathogenesis of ulcers of the sole in cattle. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 104: 966–970.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H., McAllan, A. B., Hewitt, H. D. and Lewis, P. E. 1978. Estimation of amounts of microbial and dietary nitrogen compounds entering the duodenum of cattle. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 40: 551–568.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. 1980. Progress in silage production and utilisation. J. Roy. agric. Soc. England 141: 127–141.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Strachan, P. J. 1980. The contribution of undegraded protein to the protein requirements of dairy cows. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, 1980 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 99–118. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar