Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:05:32.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

3.3 A model of the Growth and Feed Intake of Ad Libitum Fed Animals, Particularly Poultry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

G. C. Emmans
G. C. Emmans*
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh
Get access

Extract

Whittemore and Fawcett (1976) and Whittemore (1976) showed how ideas and data from different disciplines could be brought together to simulate, using a computer program, the growth of the pig on controlled feeding. Controlled feeding, as shown in Figure 3.3.1, is one of three types of feeding system (Emmans, 1981). Parks (1970) dealt with systems of the second type, in which animals are given free access to single feed. In such a system, the composition of the diet, but not its amount, is known in advance. Parks (1970) suggested that the rate of feed intake in growing animals increased at a diminishing rate with age towards an asymptotic value; Figure 3.3.2. This function has two parameters — the asymptote and a time constant. The values of these were seen as functions of feed composition, genotype and environment. He went on to predict growth as a function of feed intake and a conversion efficiency. While a description of how ad libitum feed intake changes with age is useful, it is not as powerful as an understanding of what governs feed intake would be. While there are many theories about the mechanisms that animals use to control their feed intake at a given level, there is none that can be used to predict what this level will be. One is proposed in this paper.

Type
3. Model Building
Information
BSAP Occasional Publication , Volume 5 , 1981 , pp. 103 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brody, S. 1945. Bioenergetics and Growth. Reinhold. New York.Google Scholar
Combs, G. 1962. The inter-relationships of dietary energy and protein in poultry nutrition. In Nutrition of Pigs and Poultry (ed. Morgan, J. T. and Lewis, D.), Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Emmans, G. C. 1981. Selection by hens of a diet from a pair of feeds. Anim. Prod. (in press).Google Scholar
Hakansson, J., Erikson, S. and Skensson, S. A. 1978. Reports 57 and 59. Dept. of Anim. Hus. Swedish Univ. of Ag. Sci. Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Parks, J. R. 1970. Growth curves and physiology of growth. I. Animals. Am. J. Physiol. 219: 833–843.Google Scholar
Petersen, V. and Emmans, G. C. 1965. Ann. Rep. Landbrughøjskole, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. 1976. A study of growth responses to nutrient inputs by modelling. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35: 383–391.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. and Fawcett, R. 1976. Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to simulate protein and lipid growth in pigs. Anim. Prod. 22: 87–96.Google Scholar