Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T19:37:39.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Value Shift: Immigration Attitudes and the Sociocultural Divide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2020

Caroline Marie Lancaster Open the ORCID record for Caroline Marie Lancaster [Opens in a new window]
Caroline Marie Lancaster*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The sociocultural divide in Western Europe is increasingly focused on issues of national identity, namely immigration. It is commonly assumed that opponents of immigration also exhibit conservatism on other sociocultural issues. Yet recent research suggests that general social conservatism is declining in the region. Do immigration attitudes fit squarely into the sociocultural dimension? Using survey data from eleven West European countries, as well as a Dutch household panel from 2007–2019, this study finds that gender attitudes, a key sociocultural issue, are subject to change through both cohort and life cycle effects, while immigration attitudes are stable over the course of the panel and exhibit little variation across cohorts. Immigration attitudes also appear to be immune to period effects resulting from the 2015 refugee crisis. Further, those born during and after the ‘post-materialist revolution’ have weakened associations between these two attitudes, while older individuals' attitudes are strongly correlated. The combination of gender egalitarianism and anti-immigrant sentiment may become increasingly common as acceptance of the former spreads, while immigration remains a hotly contested issue.

Keywords

sociocultural attitudesideologyimmigration attitudesgender attitudesnationalismEuropean politics
Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , January 2022 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J, De Vries, CE and Leiter, D (2012) Subconstituency reactions to elite depolarization in the Netherlands: an analysis of the Dutch public's policy beliefs and partisan loyalties, 1986–98. British Journal of Political Science 42(1), 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, T (2005) Anti-immigration parties and the defence of liberal values: the exceptional case of the List Pim Fortuyn. Journal of Political Ideologies 10(3), 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, T (2015) Gender and the radical right in Western Europe: a comparative analysis of policy agendas. Patterns of Prejudice 49(1–2), 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Verso: London.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S, Rodden, J and Snyder, JM (2008) The strength of issues: using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review 102(2), 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldassarri, D and Gelman, A (2008) Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in American public opinion. American Journal of Sociology 114(2), 408–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldassarri, D and Park, B (2020) Was there a culture war? Partisan polarization and secular trends in US public opinion. The Journal of Politics 82(3), 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B (2002) Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bechtel, MM et al. (2015) Reality bites: the limits of framing effects for salient and contested policy issues. Political Science Research and Methods 3(3), 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornschier, S (2010) Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Bornschier, S (2018) Globalization, cleavages, and the radical right. In Rydgren, J (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 212–238.Google Scholar
Campbell, R and Erzeel, S (2018) Exploring gender differences in support for rightist parties: the role of party and gender ideology. Politics & Gender 14(1), 80–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, DB and Signorino, CS (2010) Back to the future: modeling time dependence in binary data. Political Analysis 18(3), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughey, D, O'Grady, T and Warshaw, C (2019) Policy ideology in European mass publics, 1981–2016. American Political Science Review 113(3), 674–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, PE (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter, D (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, pp. 206–261.Google Scholar
De Lange, SL and Mügge, LM (2015) Gender and right-wing populism in the low countries: ideological variations across parties and time. Patterns of Prejudice 49(1–2), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vos, K (2009) Panel Attrition in LISS. Tilburg: CentERdata.Google Scholar
De Vos, K (2015) Representativiteit van het LISS panel 2015 (Representativeness of the LISS Panel 2015). CentER data.Google Scholar
De Vries, CE (2018) The cosmopolitan-parochial divide: changing patterns of party and electoral competition in the Netherlands and beyond. Journal of European Public Policy 25(11), 1541–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, CE, Hakhverdian, A and Lancee, B (2013) The dynamics of voters’ left/right identification: the role of economic and cultural attitudes. Political Science Research and Methods 1(2), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wilde, P et al. (2019) The Struggle Over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennison, J (2019) How issue salience explains the rise of the populist right in Western Europe. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. Available from https://doi-org.eres.qnl.qa/10.1093/ijpor/edz022.Google Scholar
Downes, JF and Loveless, M (2018) Centre right and radical right party competition in Europe: strategic emphasis on immigration, anti-incumbency, and economic crisis. Electoral Studies 54, 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckitt, J and Sibley, CG (2009) A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry 20(2–3), 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, C and Stimson, JA (2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, SR (2017) In the Name of Women's Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, S and Johnston, C (2014) Understanding the determinants of political ideology: implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology 35(3), 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, SC and Lee, A-R (2003) The new politics, culture wars, and the authoritarian-libertarian value change in advanced industrial democracies. Comparative Political Studies 36(3), 235–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, A and Scholten, P (2016). The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GESIS Data Archive C (2020) European Values Study 2017: Integrated dataset (EVS 2017). https://www.gesis.org/en/services/data-analysis/international-survey-programs/european-values-study/.Google Scholar
Gidron, N (2020) Many ways to be right: cross-pressured voters in Western Europe. British Journal of Political Science. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123420000228.Google Scholar
Goldman, SK and Hopkins, DJ (2020) Past place, present prejudice: the impact of adolescent racial context on white racial attitudes. The Journal of Politics 82(2), 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C and Otjes, S (2019) A hot topic? Immigration on the agenda in Western Europe. Party Politics 25(3), 424–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harteveld, E (2016) Winning the ‘losers’ but losing the ‘winners’? The electoral consequences of the radical right moving to the economic left. Electoral Studies 44, 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, SB and De Vries, C (2016) Turning against the Union? The impact of the crisis on the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies 44, 504–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobolt, SB and Tilley, J (2016) Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West European Politics 39(5), 971–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L, Lenz, T and Marks, G (2019). A Theory of International Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L and Marks, G (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L and Marks, G (2018) Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy 25(1), 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L, Marks, G and Wilson, CJ (2002) Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies 35(8), 965–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R and Norris, P (2017) Trump and the populist authoritarian parties: the silent revolution in reverse. Perspectives on Politics 15(2), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, S (2009) Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences, Vol. 846. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenne, EK (2018) Is nationalism or ethnopopulism on the rise today? Ethnopolitics 17(5), 546–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, C (2004) The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state: theory and policy 1. The British Journal of Sociology 55(2), 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, C (2014) The retreat is real, but what is the alternative? Multiculturalism, muscular liberalism, and Islam. Constellations 21(2), 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, JT et al. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3), 339–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitschelt, H (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Knoef, M and de Vos, K (2009) The Representativeness of LISS, an Online Probability Panel. Retrieved August 31, 2012. Available from https://www.lissdata.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden/paper_knoef_devos_website.pdf.Google Scholar
Knutsen, O (2004) Religious denomination and party choice in Western Europe: a comparative longitudinal study from eight countries, 1970–97. International Political Science Review 25(1), 97–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H (1998) The transformation of cleavage politics: the 1997 Stein Rokkan lecture. European Journal of Political Research 33(2), 165–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H and Bornschier, S (2012) The populist right, the working class, and the changing face of class politics. In Rydgren, J (ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right. New York: Routledge, pp. 28–48.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H et al. (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research 45(6), 921–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kustov, A, Laaker, D and Reller, C (2019) The stability of immigration attitudes: evidence and implications. SSRN Working Paper. Available from https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3322121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W (1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lægaard, S (2007) Liberal nationalism and the nationalisation of liberal values. Nations and Nationalism 13(1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, C (2020) “Replication Data for: Value Shift: Immigration Attitudes and the Sociocultural Divide”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HZLAF0, Harvard Dataverse, V1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, CM (2019) Not so radical after all: ideological diversity among radical right supporters and its implications. Political Studies 68(3), 600–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, SM and Rokkan, S (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, Vol. 7. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mair, P (2008) Electoral volatility and the Dutch party system: a comparative perspective. Acta Politica 43(2–3), 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malka, A, Lelkes, Y and Soto, CJ (2019) Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science 49(3), 1045–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, P and Naumann, E (2018) Do right-wing parties foster welfare chauvinistic attitudes? A longitudinal study of the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ in Germany. Electoral Studies 52, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, R (2019) Cosmopolitan immigration attitudes in large European cities: contextual or compositional effects? American Political Science Review 113(2), 456–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meguid, BM (2005) Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review 99(3), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meret, S and Siim, B (2013) Gender, populism and politics of belonging: discourses of right-wing populist parties in Denmark, Norway and Austria. Negotiating Gender and Diversity in an Emergent European Public Sphere. Berlin: Springer, pp. 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D (2017) Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C and Kaltwasser, CR (2015) Vox populi or vox masculini? Populism and gender in Northern Europe and South America. Patterns of Prejudice 49(1–2), 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P and Inglehart, R (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardos-Prado, S (2015) How can mainstream parties prevent niche party success? Center-right parties and the immigration issue. The Journal of Politics 77(2), 352–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parekh, B (1996) Minority practices and principles of toleration. International Migration Review 30(1), 251–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckase, MD (1997) The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement 21(1), 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherpenzeel, AC and Das, M (2011) True longitudinal and probability-based internet panels: evidence from the Netherlands. In Das, M, Ester, P and Kaczmirek, L (eds), Social and Behavioral Research and the Internet: Advances in Applied Methods and Research Strategies. New York: Routledge, pp. 77–104.Google Scholar
Sniderman, PM and Hagendoorn, L (2007) When Ways of Life Collide: Multiculturalism and its Discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spierings, N, Lubbers, M and Zaslove, A (2017) Sexually modern nativist voters: do they exist and do they vote for the populist radical right? Gender and Education 29(2), 216–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spierings, N and Zaslove, A (2015) Conclusion: dividing the populist radical right between liberal nativism and traditional conceptions of gender. Patterns of Prejudice 49(1–2), 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treier, S and Hillygus, DS (2009) The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly 73(4), 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vossen, K (2011) Classifying Wilders: the ideological development of Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom. Politics 31(3), 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeden, J and Kurzban, R (2016) Do people naturally cluster into liberals and conservatives? Evolutionary Psychological Science 2(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Lancaster Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HZLAF0
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Lancaster supplementary material

Lancaster supplementary material
Download Lancaster supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.6 MB