Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:09:44.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Price of Conscience: The Electoral Correlates and Consequences of Free Votes and Rebellions in the British House of Commons, 1987–92

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Charles Pattie ,
Edward Fieldhouse  and
R. J. Johnston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Conventional accounts of British politics play down the electoral importance of MPs' actions in the House of Commons. Party, it is assumed, is the key feature in shaping voters' preferences: few voters are aware of how their local representative voted on a particular issue, and in any case most MPs vote along party lines. On occasion, however, MPs do vote against the party line. Where the issue involved commands considerable public interest, this may raise an individual MP's profile with his or her constituents, with consequent effects upon future electoral prospects. This article investigates the connection between MPs' votes on a series of free votes and rebellions during the 1987 Parliament and their share of the vote in the 1992 general election. Generally, Conservative MPs' actions in the Commons had no effect on their subsequent share of the popular vote. However where an issue was of marked public interest, such as capital punishment or the poll tax, how the MPs voted did exert a small but discernible effect on the support that they received in 1992.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 359 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Johnston, R. J. and Pattie, C. J., ‘Where the Tories Lost and Won’, Parliamentary Affairs, 46 (1993), 192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wood, P. and Norton, P., ‘Do Candidates Matter? Constituency-Specific Vote Changes for Incumbent MPs, 1983–1987’, Political Studies, 40 (1992), 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Cain, B. E., Ferejohn, J. A. and Fiorina, M. P., ‘The Constituency Service Bias of the Personal Vote for US Representatives and British Members of Parliament’, American Political Science Review, 78 (1984), 110–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar: Cain, B. E., Ferejohn, J. A. and Fiorina, M. P., The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cain, B. E., ‘Blessed be the Tie that Unbinds: Constituency Work and the Vote Swing in Great Britain’, Political Studies, 31 (1983), 103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Himmelwiet, H. T., Humphreys, P. and Jaeger, M., How Voters Decide (Milton Keynes, Bucks: Open University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; Butler, David and Stokes, Donald, Political Change in Britain, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan, 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. But see Särlvik, Bo and Crewe, Ivor, Decade of Dealignment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

4 Beer, Samuel H., Modern British Politics (London: Faber & Faber, 1965).Google Scholar

5 Gamble, A., ‘The Thatcher Decade in Perspective’ in Dunleavy, P., Gamble, A. and Peele, G., eds, Developments in British Politics 3 (Basingstoke, Hants: Macmillan, 1990).Google Scholar

6 Norton, P., Conservative Dissidents (London: Temple Smith, 1978)Google Scholar; Norton, P., The British Polity, 2nd edn (New York: Longman, 1991), pp. 307–8Google Scholar; Kavanagh, D., British Politics: Continuities and Change, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 227.Google Scholar

7 Gregory, R., ‘Local Elections and the “Rule of Anticipated Reactions”’, Political Studies, 17 (1969), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Norton, P., ‘Behavioural Changes: Backbench Independence in the 1980s’, in Norton, P. ed. Parliament in the 1980s (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985), pp. 40–43.Google Scholar

9 Marsh, D. and Read, M., Private Members' Bills (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989, chap. 5).Google Scholar

10 See also Marsh, and Read, , Private Members' Bills, chap. 5Google Scholar: they analyse parliamentary voting records between 1964 and 1983.

11 Marsh, and Read, , Private Members' Bills, chap. 6Google Scholar; Marsh, D. and Chambers, J., Abortion Politics (London: Junction Press, 1981).Google Scholar

12 Johnston, R. J., Pattie, C. J. and Allsopp, J. G., A Nation Dividing? The Electoral Map of Great Britain, 1979–1987 (London: Longman, 1988)Google Scholar; Curtice, J., ‘One Nation?’ in Jowell, R., Witherspoon, S. and Broom, L., eds, British Social Attitudes: The Fifth Report (Aldershot, Hants: Gower, 1988)Google Scholar; Pattie, C. J. and Johnston, R. J., ‘Embellishment and Detail? The Changing Relationship Between Voting, Class, Attitudes and the Core-Periphery Division of Great Britain, 1979–1980’, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, NS 15 (1990), 205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Pattie, C. J. and Johnston, R. J., ‘Thatcherism – One Nation or Two? An Exploration of British Political Attitudes in the 1980s’, Government and Policy, 8 (1990), 269–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 The regions were: Strathclyde; East Central Scotland; rural Scotland; the rural north of England; the industrial North East; Merseyside; Greater Manchester; the rest of the North West; West Yorkshire; South Yorkshire; rural Wales; industrial South Wales; West Midlands conurbation; rest of West Midlands; East Midlands; East Anglia; Devon and Cornwall; rest of the South West excluding Devon and Cornwall; Inner London; Outer London; Outer Metropolitan; Outer South East.

15 Analysis of variance was used in preference to ordinary least squares (OLS) regression because of the large number of categorical independent variables in the models. The ANOVA estimates all show net effects, taking into account the influence of the other independent variables. Our conclusions were not substantially altered by repeating the analyses using OLS. Details available from the authors.

16 Marsh, and Read, , Private Members' Bills, pp. 105–7.Google Scholar

17 As in OLS multiple regression, the coefficients for each independent variable in MCA are adjusted to take into account the effects of the other independent variables in the model. MCA differs from OLS in that its ‘dummy variables’ relate deviations to the mean rather than to a baseline constant. Thus, an MCA coefficient of −0.25 for Conservative MPs on the TV Bill vote means that, on average and controlling for the other independent variables in the model, the probability of Conservative MPs supporting the televising of Parliament was 0.25 lower than for the average MP. Continuous variables are treated the same in MCA and OLS, and their coefficients can be interpreted in exactly the same way as normal regression coefficients. Running OLS instead of MCA produces very few substantive differences in the findings. On MCA, see Morgan, J. N., Sonquist, J. A. and Klem, L., Multiple Classification Analysis (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research, 1973).Google Scholar

18 Marsh, and Read, , Private Members' Bills, chap. 5.Google Scholar

19 For technical details of the entropy-maximizing approach, see Johnston, R. J. and Pattie, C. J., ‘Using an Entropy-Maximizing Procedure to Estimate Territorial Social Indicators: An Introduction and Illustration’, Social Indicators Research, 27 (1992), 235–56Google Scholar. These estimates are derived using entropy-maximizing methods. Entropy-maximizing uses known information (the 1987 and 1992 election results for each constituency, and the national flow-of-the-vote matrix between 1987 and 1992) to estimate unknown information (the flow of the vote matrix for each individual constituency). The estimates derived are conservative and robust. To ensure that our conclusions were not simply artefacts of the estimates, we repeated the analyses reported here using actual constituency vote shares as the dependent variables. The results of these analyses confirm the conclusions in the article: details are available from the authors.

20 Crewe, Ivor and Payne, Clive, ‘Another Game With Nature: An Ecological Regression Model of the British Two-Party Vote Ratio in 1970’, British Journal of Political Science, 6 (1976), 43–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Johnston, R. J., Pattie, C. J. and Allsopp, J. G., A Nation Dividing? The Electoral Map of Great Britain 1979–1987 (London: Longman, 1988).Google Scholar

21 Johnston, R. J. and Pattie, C. J., ‘Is the See-Saw Tipping Back? The End of Thatcherism and Changing Voting Patterns in Great Britain, 1979–92’ Environment and Planning A, 24 (1992), 1491–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pattie, C. J., Johnston, R. J. and Fieldhouse, E. A., ‘Plus Ça Change? The Changing Electoral Geography of Great Britain, 1979–92’ in Denver, D., Norris, P., Railings, C. and Broughton, D., eds, British Elections and Parties Yearbook 1993 (Hemel Hempstead, Bucks: Simon & Schuster, 1994).Google Scholar

22 The ANOVA results showed that the control variables were significantly related to constituency flow of the vote in every model tested. Furthermore, close examination of the controls showed that they were related to flow in precisely the ways expected: as a result, we offer no further discussion of the control variables here (details available on request).

23 When we repeated these analyses using vote share, only the Mates amendment vote produced a result significant at the 95 per cent level. It was significantly related to the Labour share of the vote in Conservative seats: where the Tory MP supported the amendment, Labour's vote share was 1 percentage point below average, but where the MP voted against, Labour support was 0.11 percentage points above. The capital punishment vote was significantly related to the Conservative share of the vote at the 90 per cent level. Details are available from the authors.

24 Cain, , Ferejohn, and Fiorina, , ‘The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote’, p. 122.Google Scholar