Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:29:09.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Toleration: A Reply to Jones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2010

Glen Newey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 223 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jones, Peter, ‘Making Sense of Political Toleration’, this Journal, 37 (2007), 383–402, pp. 389–390Google Scholar.

2 I make this case in my Virtue, Reason and Toleration (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999), chap. 4.

3 Jones, , ‘Making Sense of Political Toleration’, p. 397Google Scholar.

4 Jones, , ‘Making Sense of Political Toleration’, p. 398Google Scholar.

5 Jones, , ‘Making Sense of Political Toleration’, p. 398Google Scholar.

6 Matters would be different, no doubt, if I had disabled you first by scything your legs from under you as you homed in on the pizza. But even this does not seem best described as intolerance on my part.

7 Jones, , ‘Making Sense of Political Toleration’, p. 398Google Scholar.

8 I here draw on Williams’s distinction between freedom and liberty: see Williams, Bernard, ‘From Freedom to Liberty’ in In the Beginning Was the Deed (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.