¹ Weber, Max in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, trans. (New York: Oxford University, 1958), pp. 90–1.Google Scholar

² Weber, in Gerth, and Mills, , From Max Weber, p. 232.Google Scholar

³ Chapman, Richard A. and Greenaway, John R., The Dynamics of Administrative Reform (London: Croom Helm, 1980), pp. 40–1.Google Scholar

⁴ Chapman, and Greenaway, , The Dynamics of Administrative Reform, pp. 44, 59, 62.Google Scholar

⁵ Chapman, and Greenaway, , The Dynamics of Administrative Reform, p. 106.Google Scholar

⁶ Wilson, Woodrow, ‘The Study of Administration’, Political Science Quarterly, 16 (1941, reprint), 481–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Goodnow, Frank J., Politics and Administration (New York: Macmillan, 1900), pp. 92–3Google Scholar; and Gulick, Luther, ‘Science, Values and Public Administration’Google Scholar, in Gulick, Luther and Urwick, L., Papers in the Science of Administration (New York: Institute of Public Administration, 1937), pp. 1–46, at p. 10.Google Scholar

⁷ Wilson, , ‘The Study of Administration’, pp. 493–4.Google Scholar

⁸ Rockman, Bert A., The Leadership Question (New York: Praeger, 1984), pp. 8, 48.Google Scholar

⁹ Heclo, Hugh, ‘In Search of a Role: America's Higher Civil Service’, in Suleiman, Ezra N., ed., Bureaucrats and Policy Making (London: Holmes and Meier, 1984), pp. 8–34, at p. 11.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Heclo, , ‘In Search of a Role’, p. 9.Google Scholar

¹¹ Price, Don, ‘General Dawes and Executive Staff Work’, Public Administration Review, 11 (1951), 167–72, at p. 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar, as cited by Berman, Larry, The Office of Management and Budget (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975), p. 6.Google Scholar

¹² Simon, Herbert A., Administrative Behavior (New York: Macmillan, 1957), pp. 57–8.Google Scholar

¹³ See, for instance, Landau, Martin, ‘The Concept of Decision-Making in the Field of Public Administration’, in Mailick, Sidney and Van Ness, Edward H., eds, Concepts and Issues in Administrative Behavior (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962), pp. 1–28, at p. 10Google Scholar; Holden, Matthew, ‘Imperialism in Bureaucracy’, American Political Science Review, 60 (1966), 943–51, p. 944CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Kaufman, Herbert, ‘Administrative Decentralization and Political Power’, Public Administration Review, 29 (1969), 3–15, at pp. 4–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁴ Chapman, Brian, The Profession of Government (London: Unwin University Books, 1959), p. 275.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Christoph, James B., ‘Higher Civil Servants and the Politics of Consensualism in Great Britain’, in Dogan, Mattei, ed., The Mandarins of Western Europe: The Political Roles of Top Civil Servants (New York: Halsted, 1975), pp. 25–62, especially pp. 32–6Google Scholar; Chapman, and Greenaway, , The Dynamics of Administrative Reform, pp. 53, 62.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Heclo, Hugh and Wildavsky, Aaron, The Private Government of Public Money: Community and Policy Inside British Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974), p. 3.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Suleiman, Ezra N., ‘From Right to Left: Bureaucracy and Politics in France’Google Scholar, in Suleiman, , ed., Bureaucrats and Policy Making, pp. 107–36, at pp. 108–9, 111Google Scholar; Feigenbaum, Harvey B., The Politics of Public Enterprise: Oil and The French State (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985), pp. 4, 8, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁸ Mayntz, Renate, ‘German Bureaucrats: A Functional Elite Between Politics and Administration’Google Scholar, in Suleiman, , ed., Bureaucrats and Policy Making, pp. 174–205, at pp. 175–6.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Mayntz, , ‘German Bureaucrats’, at p. 192.Google Scholar

²⁰ Putnam, Robert D., ‘The Political Attitudes of Senior Civil Servants in Britain, Germany and Italy’Google Scholar, in Dogan, , ed., The Mandarins of Western Europe, pp. 87–128, at p. 90Google Scholar. Cited in Mayntz, , p. 193.Google Scholar

²¹ Aberbach, Joel D., Putnam, Robert A. and Rockman, Bert A., Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981), pp. 2–20.Google Scholar

²² Campbell, Colin and Szablowski, George J., The Superbureaucrats: Structure and Behavior in Central Agencies (Toronto: Macmillan, 1979), Chap. 1.Google Scholar

²³ Campbell, and Szablowski, , The Superbureaucrats, p. 13.Google Scholar

²⁴ Campbell, Colin, Managing the Presidency: Carter, Reagan and the Search for Executive Harmony (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1986), pp. 199–201.Google Scholar

²⁵ Campbell, Colin, SJ, ‘The Pitfalls of a Revisionism Too Eager by Half: An Open Letter to Richard Van Loon’, Canadian Public Administration, 28 (1985), 319–29, pp. 321–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁶ The Times (15 11 1976)Google Scholar as cited by Chapman, R. A., Leadership in the British Civil Service (London: Crown Helm, 1984), p. 194.Google Scholar

²⁷ Campbell, Colin, Governments Under Stress: Political Executives and Key Bureaucrats in Washington, London and Ottawa (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1983), pp. 128–9.Google Scholar

²⁸ Campbell, , Governments Under Stress, p. 57.Google Scholar

²⁹ Campbell, , Governments Under Stress, p. 130.Google Scholar

³⁰ Chapman, , Leadership in the British Civil Service, p. 159.Google Scholar

³¹ Chapman, Richard A., ‘Administrative Reform and Leadership in the United Kingdom’, in Campbell, Colin, SJ, and Peters, B. Guy, eds, Organizing Governance: Governing Organizations (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1988), in press.Google Scholar

³² Granatstein, J. L., A Man of Influence: Norman A. Robertson and Canadian Statecraft, 1929–68 (Ottawa: Deneau, 1981)Google Scholar; and Granatstein, J. L., Ottawa Men: The Civil Service Mandarins, 1935–57 (Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

³³ Granatstein, , A Man of Influence, pp. 86, 92, 145, 253, 332.Google Scholar

³⁴ Heeney, A. D. P., ‘Cabinet Government in Canada: Some Recent Developments in the Machinery of the Central Executive’, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 12 (1946), 282–301, p. 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Granatstein, , Ottawa Men, p. 207.Google Scholar

³⁵ Granatstein, , A Man of Influence, p. 253.Google Scholar

³⁶ Van Loon, Richard, ‘A Revisionist History of Planning Processes in Ottawa?: An Open Letter to Colin Campbell, SJ’, Canadian Public Administrative, 28 (1985), 307–18, p. 311CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Pitfield, Michael, ‘Remarks in Response to Colin Campbell’, in Plowden, William, ed., Advising the Rulers (Oxford: Basil Black well, 1987), pp. 143–6, at p. 146.Google Scholar

³⁷ Campbell, and Szablowski, , The Superhureaucrats, p. 167.Google Scholar

³⁸ Robertson, Gordon, ‘The Changing Role of the Privy Council Office’, Canadian Public Administration, 14 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, as reprinted in Krulak, Orest M., Schulz, Richard and Pobihushchy, Sidney I., eds, The Canadian Political Process (Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973), pp. 449–51.Google Scholar

³⁹ Campbell, Colin, ‘Cabinet Committees in Canada: Pressures and Dysfunctions Stemming from the Representational Imperative’, in Mackie, Thomas T. and Hogwood, Brian W., eds., Unlocking the Cabinet:Cabinet Structures in Comparative Perspective (London: Sage, 1985), pp. 61–85, especially p. 72.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Campbell, , Governments Under Stress, pp. 151–2.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Campbell, and Szablowski, , The Superbureaucrats, pp. 86–7.Google Scholar

⁴² Doerr, Audrey D., The Machinery of Government (Toronto: Methuen, 1981), pp. 46, 63Google Scholar; Morgan, Nicole S., Nowhere to Go? (Montreal: Institute for Research in Public Policy, 1981).Google Scholar

⁴³ Borins, Sanford F., ‘Management of the Public Sector in Japan: Are There Lessons to be Learned?’, Canadian Public Administration, 29 (1986), 175–96, p. 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴⁴ The works making the clearest effort to infer a connection between bureaucracy and performance of the Japanese economy are Johnson, Chalmers, MITI and the Japanese Miracle (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1982)Google Scholar; and Pempel, T. J., Policy and Politics in Japan: Creative Conservatism (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Pempel, T. J., ‘Organizing for Efficiency: The Higher Civil Service in Japan’Google Scholar, in Suleiman, , ed., Bureaucrats and Policy Making, 72–106, at p. 73.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Pempel, , ‘Organizing for Efficiency’, pp. 83–4.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Pempel, , ‘Organizing for Efficiency’, pp. 87–8.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Pempel, , ‘Organizing for Efficiency’, pp. 102–3.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Suleiman, Ezra N., Politics, Power, and Bureaucracy: The Administrative Elite (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974), pp. 222, 226, 231, 233.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Suleiman, , Politics, Power and Bureaucracy, pp. 324, 327.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Feigenbaum, , The Politics of Public Enterprise, pp. 4, 8, 102.Google Scholar

⁵² Feigenbaum, , The Politics of Public Enterprise, pp. 92, 100.Google Scholar

⁵³ Feigenbaum, , The Politics of Public Enterprise, pp. 108, 110.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Pellew, Jill, The Home Office 1848–1914: From Clerks to Bureaucrats (London: Heinemann, 1982).Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Christoph, , ‘Higher Civil Servants’, pp. 29, 32–4.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Mayntz, , ‘German Federal Bureaucrats’, p. 197.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Mayntz, Renate and Scharpf, Fritz, Policy-making in the German Federal Bureaucracy (Amsterdam: Elsevier Verlag, 1975), p. 91.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Mayntz, , ‘German Federal Bureaucrats’, p. 198.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Aberbach, , Putnam, and Rockman, , Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies, pp. 94–100Google Scholar; Ripley, Randall B. and Franklin, Grace A., Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1980)Google Scholar; Rose, Richard, Managing Presidential Objectives (New York: Free Press, 1976), p. 161Google Scholar; Heclo, Hugh, ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment’, in King, Anthony, ed., The New American Political System (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1978), pp. 87–124, at pp. 102–5Google Scholar; and Aberbach, Joel D. and Rockman, Bert A., ‘The Overlapping Worlds of American Federal Executives and Congressmen’, British Journal of Political Science, 7 (1977), 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁰ Feigenbaum, , The Politics of Public Enterprise, pp. 28, 62, 84, 98, 104.Google Scholar

⁶¹ Cassese, Sabino, ‘The Higher Civil Service in Italy’Google Scholar, in Suleiman, , ed., Politics, Power, and Bureaucracy, pp. 35–71, at p. 36.Google Scholar Captured bureaucracies thrive in Latin America, See Sloan, John W., Public Policy in Latin America: A Comparative Survey (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1984), pp. 129, 135Google Scholar; and Valenzuela, Arturo, ‘Parties, Politics, and the State in Chile: The Higher Civil Service’Google Scholar, in Suleiman, , ed., Politics, Power, and Bureaucracy, pp. 242–79, esp. pp. 256, 264.Google Scholar

⁶² Moe, Terry M., ‘The Politicized Presidency’, in Chubb, John and Peterson, Paul, eds, The New Direction in American Politics (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1985), pp. 235–72, at p. 239.Google Scholar

⁶³ Moe, , ‘The Political Presidency’, pp. 245–50, 258.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Nathan, Richard P., The Plot that Failed: Nixon and the Administrative Presidency (New York: Wiley, 1975).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Nathan, Richard P., The Administrative Presidency (New York: Wiley, 1983)Google Scholar; Newland, Chester A., ‘The Reagan Presidency: Limited Government and Political Administration’, Public Administration Review, 43 (1983), 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Levine, Charles and Hansen, Michael, ‘The Centralization-Decentralization Tug-of-War in the New Executive Branch’Google Scholar, in Campbell, and Peters, , eds, Organizing GovernanceGoogle Scholar, in press; Campbell, , Managing the Presidency, pp. 182–8.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Rockman, , The Leadership Question, pp. 194–7.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Campbell, , Managing the Presidency, pp. 5–6, 20–2.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Hennessy, Peter, Cabinet (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986), Chap. 3.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Top Jobs in Whitehall: Appointments and Promotions in the Senior Civil Service, a report of a Royal Institute of Public Administration Working Group, London, 1987, pp. 41–7.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Hennessy, , Cabinet, pp. 109, 111.Google Scholar

⁷¹ MrsKeegan, WilliamThatcher's Economic Experiment (Harmondsworth, Midx: Penguin, 1984).Google Scholar

⁷² See, for instance, Roberts, Paul Craig, The Supply-Side Revolution: An Insider's Account of Policymaking in Washington (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷³ Keegan, , Mrs Thatcher's Economic Experiment, pp. 34, 45, 70, 99.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ MrsKeegan, Thatcher's Economic Experiment, pp. 136, 140–1, 147, 157, 163, 167.Google Scholar

⁷⁵ MrsKeegan, Thatcher's Economic Experiments, pp. 177, 207.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Campbell, and Szablowski, , The Superbureaucrats, p. 8Google Scholar; Van Loon, Richard J., ‘Kaleidoscope in Gray: The Policy Process in Ottawa’ in Wittington, M. and Williams, G., eds, Canadian Politics in the 1980s: Introductory Readings (Toronto: Methuen, 1981), pp. 292–312Google Scholar; Campbell, , Governments Under StressGoogle Scholar, Chap. 4; Aucoin, Peter, ‘Organizing Change in Canadian Machinery of Government: From Rational Management to Brokerage Polities’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 14 (1986), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁷ Campbell, , ‘The Pitfalls’, pp. 324–5.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Van Loon, , ‘Kaleidoscope’Google Scholar; and Van Loon, Richard J., ‘The Policy Expenditure Management System in the Federal Government: The First Five Years’, Canadian Journal of Public Administration, 26 (1983), 255–85, p. 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁹ Borins, , ‘Management of the Public Sector in Japan’, p. 194Google Scholar; Campbell, , Governments Under Stress, p. 312.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Campbell, , Governments Under Stress, pp. 85–6.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Campbell, and Szablowski, , The Superbureaucrats.Google Scholar

⁸² One can catch a glimpse of the internal battles through the sparring between disciples who had sought refuge in academia: French, Richard D., How Ottawa Decides: Planning and Industrial Policy-Making, 1968–80 (Toronto: Lorimer, 1980)Google Scholar; Hartle, Douglas, ‘An Open Letter to Richard Van Loon (with a copy to Richard French)’, Canadian Public Administration, 26 (1983), 84–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and French, Richard D., ‘Did Ottawa Plan?: Reflections on My Critics’, Canadian Public Administration, 26 (1983), 100–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁸³ Campbell, , Governments Under Stress, pp. 154–5Google Scholar; Doern, G. Bruce and Toner, Glen, The Politics of Energy: The Development and Implementation of the NEP (Toronto: Methuen, 1985), pp. 37–8.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Doern, and Toner, , The Politics of Energy, pp. 47, 476.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Pollitt, Christopher J., ‘The Central Policy Review Staff, 1970–74’, Public Administration, 52 (1975), 375–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Campbell, , Governments Under Stress, pp. 63–7Google Scholar; Hennessy, Peter, Morrison, Susan and Townsend, Richard, ‘Routine Punctuated by Orgies: The Central Policy Review Staff, 1970–83’ (Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics, No. 31, 1985).Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Hennessy, , Cabinet, p. 112.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Weller, Patrick, First Among Equals: Prime Ministers in Westminister Systems (London: Allen & Unwin, 1985), pp. 136–9.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Berman, , The Office of Management and Budget, pp. 18–23.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Nelson, Anna Kasten, ‘National Security I: Inventing a Process’, in Heclo, Hugh and Salamon, Lester M., eds, The Illusion of Presidential Government (Boulder, Colorado: Westview, 1981), 229–63, especially pp. 235–6Google Scholar; and Destler, I. M., ‘National Security Advice to the President’, in Shull, Steven A. and LeLoup, Lance T., The Presidency in Policy Making (Brunswick, Ohio: King's Court, 1979), pp. 114–36, at p. 118.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Greenstein, Fred I., The Hidden-Hand Presidency: Eisenhower as Leader (New York: Basic Books, 1982), p. 127.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Campbell, , Managing the Presidency, pp. 105–7.Google Scholar

⁹² Porter, Roger B., Presidential Decision-Making: The Economic Policy Board (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), pp. 73, 78, 84, 99Google Scholar; Campbell, , Managing The Presidency, pp. 144–5.Google Scholar

⁹³ Hess, Stephen, Organizing the Presidency (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1976), pp. 212–16Google Scholar; Porter, , Presidential Decision-Making, pp. 214–21Google Scholar; Salamon, Lester M., ‘The Presidency and Domestic Policy Formulation’Google Scholar, in Heclo, and Salamon, , eds, The Illusion of Presidential Government, pp. 177–202, especially pp. 193, 199.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Mayntz, , ‘German Bureaucrats’, p. 196.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Heclo, Hugh, A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1977), p. 151.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Aberbach, Joel D. and Rockman, Bert A., ‘On the Rise, the Transformation, and the Decline of Analysis in Government’ (paper presented at the Conference on American-Canadian Political Economy: The 1980s and Beyond, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. 1986).Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Heclo, and Wildavsky, , The Private Government of Public MoneyGoogle Scholar, and Plowden, William, ‘The British Central Policy Review Staff’, in Baehr, Peter R. and Wittrock, Bjorn, eds, Policy Analysis and Policy Innovation (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981), pp. 61–91.Google Scholar

⁹⁸ Cornish, Derek B. and Clarke, Ronald V., ‘Social Science in Government: The Case of the Home Office Research and Planning Unit’, in Bulmer, Martin, ed., Social Science Research and Government: Comparative Essays on Britain and the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 166–96, especially pp. 166, 186–7Google Scholar; Weiss, Carol H., ‘Policy Research in the Context of Diffuse Decision-Making’, Journal of Higher Education, 53 (1982), 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹⁹ Olsen, Johan P., Organized Democracy: Political Institutions in a Welfare State: The Case of Norway (Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Columbia University Press, 1983), p. 19.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Olsen, , Organized Democracy, pp. 35, 125.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Olsen, , Organized Democracy, pp. 116–17, 123–4.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Olsen, Johan P., ‘Administrative Reform and Theories of Organization’Google Scholar, in Campbell, and Peters, , eds. Organizing Governance, in press.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Campbell, , Managing the Presidency, pp. 200–1.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Heclo, , ‘In Search of a Role: America's Higher Civil Service’, pp. 18–20.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁵ Fenno, Richard F., The President's Cabinet: Analysis in the Period from Wilson to Eisenhower (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1959), p. 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Porter, Roger B., ‘The President and Economic Policy: Problems, Patterns and Alternatives’Google Scholar, in Heclo, and Salamon, , eds, The Illusion of Presidential Government, pp. 203–28, especially p. 223Google Scholar; Destler, I. M., ‘National Security II: The Rise of the Assistant (1961–1981)’Google Scholar, in Heclo, and Salamon, , eds, The Illusion of Presidential Government, pp. 263–86, especially p. 279.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ Destler, , ‘National Security II’, p. 279.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Campbell, , Managing the Presidency, pp. 91Google Scholar; Brzezinski, Zbigniew, Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Adviser, 1977–1981 (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 1983), pp. 74–8.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Campbell, , Managing the Presidency, pp. 106–7.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ It is important to remember that the first – and in many respects the most successful – No. 10 policy unit operated during the last two years of the First World War. See Turner, John, Lloyd George's Secretariat (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹¹ Jones, George, ‘The Prime Minister's Men’, New Society, 19 01 1978, pp. 121–3Google Scholar; Campbell, , Governments Under Stress, pp. 68, 70.Google Scholar

¹¹² Keegan, , Mrs Thatcher's Economic Experiment, pp. 157, 163, 167Google Scholar; Hennessy, , Cabinet, pp. 101–2.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Hennessy, , Cabinet, p. 112.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Weller, , First Among Equals, pp. 139–41.Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Campbell, and Szablowski, , The Superbureaucrats, pp. 59–69.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ Aucoin, , ‘Organizing Change in Canadian Machinery of Government’Google Scholar; Campbell, , ‘Cabinet Committees in Canada’, pp. 77–80.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ Campbell, , Governments Under Stress, pp. 143–4.Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Williams, Blair, ‘The Parapolitical Bureaucracy’, in Clarke, Harold D. et al. , eds, Parliament, Policy and Representation (Toronto: Methuen, 1980), pp. 215–29.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Re-skilling Government, a report published by the Institute of Directors, London, 05 1986.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Mayntz, , ‘German Federal Bureaucrats’, p. 183Google Scholar; Derlien, Hans-Ulrich, ‘Repercussions of Government Change on the Career Civil Service in West Germany: The Cases of 1969 and 1982’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 1 (1988), 50–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹²¹ Mayntz, , ‘German Federal Bureaucrats’, p. 196.Google Scholar

¹²² Suleiman, , ‘From Right to Left’, p. 131.Google Scholar

¹²³ Suleiman, , ‘From Right to Left’, pp. 118, 129–30.Google Scholar