Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:05:28.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2018

Kristin N. Garrett  and
Alexa Bankert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Partisan bias and hostility have increased substantially over the last few decades in the American electorate, and previous work shows that partisan strength and sorting help drive this trend. Drawing on insights from moral psychology, however, we posit that partisan moral convictions heighten affective polarization beyond the effects of partisanship, increasing partisan animosity and copartisan favoritism. Testing this theory using data from two national samples and novel measures of affective polarization in everyday life, we find that people who tend to moralize politics display more partisan bias, distance and hostility, irrespective of partisan strength. These results shed light on a different moral divide that separates the American public and raise key normative questions about moral conviction and electoral politics.

Keywords

affective polarizationmoral convictionparty polarizationmoralization of politicspartisan biasAmerican electorate
Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 621 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Politics and International Relations, Wheaton College (E-mail: [email protected]); Department of Political Science, University of Georgia (E-mail: [email protected]). We would like to thank Tom Carsey, Tim Ryan, Mike MacKuen, Jim Stimson, Andrea Benjamin, Scott Clifford, participants in the State Politics Working Group at UNC-Chapel Hill, the editors at BJPS and the anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments on previous versions of this article. We are also grateful for the Thomas M. Uhlman Summer Research Fellowship that generously funded this project. Data replication sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7910/DVN/N5EGWL and online appendices at https://doi.org/doi: 10.1017/S000712341700059X

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 1998. Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate. Journal of Politics 60 (3):634–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. Is Polarization a Myth? Journal of Politics 70 (2):542–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. The Bush Effect: Polarization, Turnout, and Activism in the 2004 Presidential Election. Presidential Studies Quarterly 36 (2):141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bafumi, Joseph, and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2009. A New Partisan Voter. Journal of Politics 71 (1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankert, Alexa. 2017. Negative and Positive Partisan Identity in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Ben-Nun Bloom, Pazit. 2013. The Public’s Compass: Moral Conviction and Political Attitudes. American Politics Research 41 (6):937–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berns, Gregory S., Monica CapraEmily Bell, C. Emily Bell, C., Prietula, Michael J., Moore, Sara, Anderson, Brittany, Ginges, Jeremy, and Atran, Scott. 2012. The Price of Your Soul: Neural Evidence for the Non-Utilitarian Representation of Sacred Values. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367:754–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Paul. 2013. Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Brambilla, Marco, Sacchi, Simona, Rusconi, Patrice, Cherubini, Paolo, and Yzerbyt, Vincent Y.. 2012. You Want to Give a Good Impression? Be Honest! Moral Traits Dominate Group Impression Formation. British Journal of Social Psychology 51 (1):149–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, Mark D. 2005. The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict within the American Electorate. Political Research Quarterly 58 (2):219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis. 2014. Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, Scott. 2014. Linking Issue Stances and Trait Inferences: A Theory of Moral Exemplification. Journal of Politics 76 (3):698–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeScioli, Peter, and Kurzban, Robert. 2009. Mysteries of Morality. Cognition 112 (2):281–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeScioli, Peter, and Kurzban, Robert. 2013. A Solution to the Mysteries of Morality. Psychological Bulletin 139 (2):477–496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellemers, Naomi, Pagliaro, Stefano, Barreto, Manuela, and Leach, Colin Wayne. 2008. Is it Better to be Moral than Smart? The Effects of Morality and Competence Norms on the Decision to Work at Group Status Improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (6):1397–1410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, Stanley. 1988. Structure and Consistency in Public Opinion: The Role of Core Beliefs and Values. American Journal of Political Science 32 (2):416–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel J.. 2008. Political Polarization in the American Public. Annual Review of Political Science 11:563–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2008. Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings. Journal of Politics 70 (2):556–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Kristin N. 2015. The Moralization of Politics: How a Moral Lens Shapes Perceptions of Party Leaders. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Garrett, Kristin N., and Bankert, Alexa. 2018. Replication Data for: The Moral Roots of Partisan Division: How Moral Conviction Heightens Affective Polarization. doi:10.7910/DVN/N5EGWL, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:EytB5sHJMKrEqjxlUcPnDQ==.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Hetherington, Marc J.. 2012. Look How Far we’ve Come Apart. Available from http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/look-how-far-weve-come-apart/, accessed 23 January 2017.Google Scholar
Hamlin, J. Kiley. 2013. Moral Judgment and Action in Preverbal Infants and Toddlers: Evidence for an Innate Moral Core. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22 (3):186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heit, Evan, and Nicholson, Stephen P.. 2010. The Opposite of Republican: Polarization and Political Categorization. Cognitive Science 34 (8):1503–1516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization 95 (3):619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J.. 2009. Putting Polarization in Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 39 (2):413–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Weiler, Jonathan D.. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Seth J., and Tausanovitch, Chris. 2015. A Disconnect in Representation? Comparison of Trends in Congressional and Public Polarization. Journal of Politics 77 (4):1058–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honaker, James, King, Gary, and Blackwell, Matthew. 2011. Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data. Journal of Statistical Software 45 (7):1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Mason, Lilliana, and Aarøe, Lene. 2015. Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity. American Political Science Review 109 (1):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2012. Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3):405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2015. Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59 (3):690–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2005. Polarized Politics and the 2004 Congressional and Presidential Elections. Political Science Quarterly 120 (2):199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C.. 2007. A Divider, Not a Uniter: George W. Bush and the American People. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 2014. Is there a Culture War? Conflicting Value Structures in American Public Opinion. American Political Science Review 108 (4):754–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T., Glaser, Jack, Kruglanski, Arie W., and Sulloway, Frank J.. 2003. Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129 (3):339–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation. American Political Science Association 95:49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lall, Ranjit. 2016. How Multiple Imputation Makes a Difference. Political Analysis 24 (4):414–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate. American Journal of Political Science 46 (4):786–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., and Horowitz., Juliana Menasce 2006. Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences. Annual Review of Political Science 9:83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, Colin Wayne, Ellemers, Naomi, and Barreto, Manuela. 2007. Group Virtue: The Importance of Morality (vs. Competence and Sociability) in the Positive Evaluation of In-Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (2):234–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leege, David C., Wald, Kenneth D., Krueger, Brian S., and Mueller, Paul D.. 2002. The Politics of Cultural Differences: Social Change and Voter Mobilization Strategies in the Post-New Deal Period. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Yphtach, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2017. The Limits of Partisan Prejudice. Journal of Politics 79 (2):485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelkes, Yphtach, Sood, Gaurav, and Iyengar, Shanto. 2017. The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect. American Journal of Political Science 71 (1):5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2013. Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition. Political Communication 30 (4):565–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2013. The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (1):140–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. ‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59 (1):128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Patrick R., and Conover, Pamela Johnston. 2015. Red and Blue States of Mind: Partisan Hostility and Voting in the United States. Political Research Quarterly 68 (2):225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Gregory S., Skitka, Linda J., and Wisneski, Daniel. 2010. Moral and Religious Convictions and Intentions to Vote in the 2008 Presidential Election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 10 (1):307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, Elizabeth, and Skitka, Linda J.. 2006. Exploring the Psychological Underpinnings of the Moral Mandate Effect: Motivated Reasoning, Group Differentiation, or Anger? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (4):3629–3643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, Bernadette, and Judd, Charles M.. 1990. Measures and Models of Perceived Group Variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (2):173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew. 2014a. Political Polarization and Media Habits. Available from http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/, accessed 23 January 2017.Google Scholar
Pew. 2014b. Political Polarization in the American Public. Available from http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/, accessed 23 January 2017.Google Scholar
Pew. 2016. Partisanship and Political Animosity in 2016. Available from http://www.people-press.org/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/, accessed 23 January 2017.Google Scholar
Phillips, Chelsea J., and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2013. The Power and Influence of Political Identities beyond Political Contexts. Paper Presented at he Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Rai, Tage Shakti, and Fiske, Alan Page. 2011. Moral Psychology is Relationship Regulation: Moral Motives for Unity, Hierarchy, Equality, and Proportionality. Psychological Review 118 (1):57–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reifen Tagar, Michal, Morgan, G. Scott, Halperin, Eran, and Skitka, Linda J.. 2014. When Ideology Matters: Moral Conviction and the Association between Ideology and Policy Preferences in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology 44 (2):117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Jon C., and Sutherland, Joseph L.. 2016. How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization. Political Behavior 38 (2):485–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Donald. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Timothy J. 2014. Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics. Journal of Politics 76 (2):380–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Timothy J.. 2017. No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 61 (2):409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skitka, Linda J. 2010. The Psychology of Moral Conviction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (4):267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skitka, Linda J.. 2014. The Psychological Foundations of Moral Conviction. Pp. 148–166 in Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology, edited by Hagop Sarkissian and Jennifer Cole Wright. New York: Bloomsbury Academic Press.Google Scholar
Skitka, Linda J., and Bauman, Christopher W.. 2008. Moral Conviction and Political Engagement. Political Psychology 29 (1):29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skitka, Linda J., and Houston, David A.. 2001. When Due Process is of No Consequence: Moral Mandates and Presumed Defendant Guilt or Innocence. Social Justice Research 14 (3):305–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skitka, Linda J., and Morgan, G. Scott. 2009. The Double-Edged Sword of a Moral State of Mind. Pp. 355–374 in Personality, Identity, and Character: Explorations in Moral Psychology, edited by Darcia Narvaez and Daniel K. Lapsley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skitka, Linda J., and Morgan, G. Scott. 2014. The Social and Political Implications of Moral Conviction. Advances in Political Psychology 35 (1):95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skitka, Linda J., Bauman, Christopher W., and Lytle, Brad L.. 2009. The Limits of Legitimacy: Moral and Religious Convictions as Constraints on Deference to Authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 (4):567–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skitka, Linda J., Bauman, Christopher W., and Sargis, Edward G.. 2005. Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (6):895–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skitka, Linda J., Morgan, G. Scott, and Wisneski, Daniel C.. 2015. Political Orientation and Moral Conviction: A Conservative Advantage or an Equal Opportunity Motivator of Political Engagement? Pp. 57–74 in Social Psychology and Politics, edited by Joseph P. Forgas, Klaus Fiedler and William D. Crano. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John C.. 1979. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. Pp. 33–47 in The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by William G. Austin and Stephen Worchel. Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, Jay J., Feldman Hall, Oriel, and Mende-Siedlecki, Peter. 2015. The Neuroscience of Moral Cognition: From Dual Processes to Dynamic Systems. Current Opinion in Psychology 6:167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zomeren, Martijn, Postmes, Tom, and Spears, Russell. 2012. On Conviction’s Collective Consequences: Integrating Moral Conviction with the Social Identity Model of Collective Action. British Journal of Social Psychology 51 (1):52–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wisneski, Daniel C., Skitka, Linda J., and Morgan, G. Scott. 2011. Political Moralization in the 2012 Election. Proposal for Questions on the 2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Survey.Google Scholar
Wright, Jennifer C., Cullum, Jerry, and Schwab, Nicholas. 2008. The Cognitive and Affective Dimensions of Moral Conviction: Implications for Attitudinal and Behavioral Measures of Interpersonal Tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (11):1461–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaal, Maarten P., Laar, Colette Van, Ståhl, Thomas, Ellemers, Naomi, and Derks., Belle 2011. By Any Means Necessary: The Effects of Regulatory Focus and Moral Conviction on Hostile and Benevolent Forms of Collective Action. British Journal of Social Psychology 50 (4):670–689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Link

Garrett and Bankert Dataset

Dataset

https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7910/DVN/N5EGWL
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Garrett and Bankert supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Garrett and Bankert supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 133 KB