Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:12:52.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fairy Tale Critiques and Political Science: A Reply to Kenneth Newton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1997

KEITH DOWDING  and
PETER JOHN
KEITH DOWDING
Affiliation:
Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science
PETER JOHN
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, Southampton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We are flattered that Ken Newton considers our research to be the only serious attempt to test Tiebout in Britain, but we would like to correct the errors of his fairy tale as well as refute his criticisms.Kenneth Newton, ‘Residential Mobility in London: Rational Choice Fairy Tale, Utopia, or Reality?’ British Journal of Political Science, this issue, pp. 148–51; Peter John, Keith Dowding and Stephen Biggs, ‘Residential Mobility in London: A Micro-Level Test of the Behavioural Foundations of the Tiebout Model’, British Journal of Poltical Science, 25 (1995), 379–97.

Type
Notes and Comments
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 111 - 155
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)