Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:40:24.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electoral Engineering and Cross-National Turnout Differences: What Role for Compulsory Voting?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1999

MARK N. FRANKLIN
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Houston and Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut

Abstract

Low electoral turnout is often considered to be bad for democracy, whether inherently or because it calls legitimacy into question or because low turnout implies lack of representation of certain groups and inegalitarian policies. Yet there would appear to be a straightforward cure for low turnout: make voting compulsory. Of the twenty-five countries in the International Almanac of Electoral History for which Katz has collected institutional data, four have compulsory voting. Turnout in these countries averages 89 per cent, as compared to 75 per cent in the other twenty-one countries.

Type
Notes and Comments
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)