¹ Lijphart, Arend, Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² Schmitter, Philippe C., ‘Reflections on Where the Theory of Neo-Corporatism Has Gone and Where the Praxis of Neo-Corporatism May Be Going’, in Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe C., eds, Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making (London: Sage, 1982), p. 264Google Scholar. See also Schmitter, Philippe C., ‘Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability in Contemporary Western Europe and North America’, in Berger, Suzanne, ed., Organizing Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 295–6.Google Scholar

³ Lijphart, , Democracies, pp. 211–20.Google Scholar

⁴ Schmidt, Manfred G., ‘Does Corporatism Matter? Economic Crisis, Politics and Rates of Unemployment in Capitalist Democracies in the 1970s’Google Scholar, in Lehmbruch, and Schmitter, , eds, Patterns of Corporatist Policy-MakingGoogle Scholar; Schmidt, Manfred G., ‘The Role of the Parties in Shaping Macroeconomic Policy’, in Castles, Francis G., ed., The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States (London: Sage, 1982)Google Scholar; Schmidt, Manfred G., ‘Politische Bedingungen erfolgreicher Wirtschaftspolitik: Eine vergleichende Analyse westlicher Industrieländer’, Journal für Sozialforschung, 26 (1986), 251–73Google Scholar; Paloheimo, Heikki, ‘Distributive Struggle, Corporatist Power Structures and Economic Policy of the 1970s in Developed Capitalist Countries’, in Paloheimo, Heikki, ed., Politics in the Era of Corporatism and Planning (Helsinki: Finnish Political Science Association, 1984)Google Scholar; Cameron, David R., ‘Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labour Quiescence and the Representation of Economic Interest in Advanced Capitalist Society’, in Goldthorpe, John H., ed., Orderand Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Schott, Kerry, Policy, Power and Order: The Persistence of Economic Problems in Capitalist Stales (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Bruno, Michael and Sachs, Jeffrey D., Economics of Worldwide Stagflation (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Crouch, Colin, ‘Conditions for Trade Union Wage Restraint’, in Lindberg, Leon and Maier, Charles S., eds, The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation; Theoretical Approaches and International Case Studies (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1985)Google Scholar; Wilensky, Harold L. and Turner, Lowell, Democratic Corporatism and Policy Linkages: The Interdependence of Industrial, Labor-Market, Incomes, and Social Policies in Eight Countries (Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, 1987)Google Scholar; Lehner, Franz, ‘The Political Economy of Distributive Conflict’, in Castles, Francis G., Lehner, Franz and Schmidt, Manfred G., eds, Managing Mixed Economies (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1988).Google Scholar

⁵ Therborn, Göran, ‘Does Corporatism Really Matter? The Economic Crisis and Issues of Political Theory’, Journal of Public Policy, 1 (1987), 259–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Freeman, John R., Democracy and Markets: The Politics of Mixed Economies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

⁶ Dahrendorf, Ralf, ‘Tertium Non Datur: A Comment on the Andrew Shonfield Lectures’, Government and Opposition, 24 (1989), 131–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schmitter, Philippe C., ‘Corporatism Is Dead! Long Live Corporatism!’, Government and Opposition, 24 (1989), 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷ Williamson, Peter J., Corporatism in Perspective: An Introductory Guide to Corporatist Theory (London: Sage, 1989), p. 151.Google Scholar

⁸ Wilensky, Harold L., The ‘New Corporatism’, Centralization, and the Welfare State, Sage Professional Papers in Contemporary Political Sociology, No. 06–020 (London: Sage, 1976)Google Scholar; Goldthorpe, John H., ‘The End of Convergence: Corporatist and Dualist Tendencies in Modern Western Societies’Google Scholar, in Goldthorpe, , ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary CapitalismGoogle Scholar; Marks, Gary, ‘Neo-corporatism and Incomes Policy in Western Europe and North America’, Comparative Politics, 18 (1986), 253–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Humphries, Craig, ‘Explaining Cross-National Variation in Levels of Strike Activity’, Comparative Politics, 22 (1990), 167–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹ Williamson, , Corporatism in Perspective, p. 151.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Katzenstein, Peter J., Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; see also Rogowski, Ronald, ‘Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions’, International Organization, 41 (1987), 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹¹ Lehmbruch, Gerhard, ‘Consociational Democracy, Class Conflict, and the New Corporatism’, in Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard, eds, Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979), p. 59.Google Scholar

¹² McRae, Kenneth D., ‘Comment: Federation, Consociation, Corporatism – An Addendum to Arend Lijphart’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 12 (1979), p. 520CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Heisler, Martin O. and Kvavik, Robert B., ‘Patterns of European Politics: The “European Polity” Model’, in Heisler, Martin O., ed., Politics in Europe: Structures and Processes in Some Postindustrial Democracies (New York: McKay, 1974)Google Scholar; Scholten, Ilja, ed., Political Stability and Neo-Corporatism: Corporatist Integration and Societal Cleavages in Western Europe (London: Sage, 1987).Google Scholar

¹³ Wilensky, , The ‘New Corporatism’, p. 26Google Scholar; Wilensky, Harold L., ‘Leftism, Catholicism, and Democratic Corporatism: The Role of Political Parties in Recent Welfare State Development’, in Flora, Peter and Heidenheimer, Arnold J., eds, The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1981), p. 363Google Scholar; Schmitter, , ‘Interest Intermediation and Regime Governability’, p. 294Google Scholar; Schmidt, , ‘Does Corporatism Matter?’, p. 245Google Scholar; Schmidt, , ‘Politische Bedingungen erfolgreicher Wirtschaftspolitik’, p. 263Google Scholar; Czada, Roland, ‘Konsensbedingungen und Auswirkungen neokorporatistischer Politikentwicklung’, Journal für Sozialforschung, 23 (1983), p. 425Google Scholar; Cameron, , ‘Social Democracy, Corporatism, Labour Quiescence and the Representation of Economic Interest’, p. 165Google Scholar; Lehmbruch, Gerhard, ‘Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks’Google Scholar, in Goldthorpe, , ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, p. 66Google Scholar; Paloheimo, , ‘Distributive Struggle, Corporatist Power Structures and Economic Policy’, p. 16Google Scholar; Schott, , Policy, Power and Order, p. 43Google Scholar; Bruno, and Sachs, , Economics of Worldwide Stagflation, p. 226Google Scholar; Crouch, , ‘Conditions for Trade Union Wage Restraint’, p. 117Google Scholar; Marks, , ‘Neocorporatism and Incomes Policy’, p. 261Google Scholar; Lehner, Franz, ‘Interest Intermediation, Institutional Structures and Public Policy’, in Keman, Hans, Paloheimo, Heikki and Whiteley, Paul F., eds, Coping with the Economic Crisis: Alternative Responses to Economic Recession in Advanced Industrial Societies (London: Sage, 1987), p. 58Google Scholar; Lehner, , ‘The Political Economy of Distributive Conflict’, p. 74Google Scholar. Where one expert offered two different measures (Cameron, Schmidt, Bruno and Sachs – we treated the last two authors as a single expert since they were co-authors), we standardized the values of each of the two measures, averaged them, and then standardized them again.

¹⁴ For fourteen of these countries, we have all twelve judgements: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. For Ireland we have eleven, for Australia and Japan ten, and for New Zealand six judgements.

¹⁵ Lijphart, , Democracies, pp. 211–16.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Schmidt, , ‘The Role of the Parties in Shaping Macroeconomic Policy’, pp. 109, 135, 164–5.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Rogowski, , ‘Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions’, p. 215.Google Scholar

¹⁸ LaPalombara, Joseph, Democracy, Italian Style (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1987), pp. 213, 218.Google Scholar

¹⁹ Lijphart, , Democracies, p. 221.Google Scholar