Adman, P and Jansson, H (2017) A field experiment on ethnic discrimination among local Swedish public officials. Local Government Studies 44(1), 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, N (1998) Letters by phone or speech by other means: the linguistics of email. Language & Communication 18(2), 133–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berinsky, A, Huber, G and Lenz, G (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon. com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20(3), 351–368.Google Scholar

Bishin, B and Hayes, T (2016) Do Elected Officials Service the Poor? A Field Experiment on the U.S. Congress. Paper Presented at the Annual Southern Political Science Associate Conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 9 January.Google Scholar

Broockman, D (2013) Black politicians are more intrinsically motivated to advance Blacks’ interests: A field experiment manipulating political incentives. American Journal of Political Science 57(3), 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broockman, D and Butler, D (2017) The causal effects of elite position-taking on voter attitudes: field experiments with elite communication. American Journal of Political Science 61(1), 208–221.Google Scholar

Butler, D (2014) Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnes, N and Holbein, J (2019) Do public officials exhibit social class biases when they handle casework? Evidence from multiple correspondence experiments. PLoS One 14(3), e0214244.Google ScholarPubMed

Chen, J, Pan, J and Xu, Y (2016) Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science 60(2), 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, M (2017) How responsive are political elites? A meta-analysis of experiments on public officials. Journal of Experimental Political Science 4(3), 241–254.Google Scholar

Costa, M (2019) “Replication Data for: Citizen Evaluations of Legislator-Constituent Communication”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/4C1KJT, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:406lEkAzzIXLqvxrBw5bRw==[fileUNF]Google Scholar

Dai, X (2007) Political ethics online: parliamentarians’ use of email in Europe. The Journal of Legislative Studies 13(3), 458–476.Google Scholar

Dynes, A, Hassell, H and Miles, M (2018) Political ambition and constituent service: Does ambition influence how local officials respond to electoral and non-eelectoral service requests? Unpublished. Available at http://adamdynes.com/documents/WP_2018_dynes-etal_ambition-and-responsiveness.pdf (accessed 31 August 2019).Google Scholar

Einstein, K and Glick, D (2017) Does race affect access to government services? An experiment exploring street level bureaucrats and access to public housing. American Journal of Political Science 61(1), 100–116.Google Scholar

Gell-Redman, M et al. (2018) It's all about race: how state legislators respond to immigrant constituents. Political Research Quarterly 71(3), 517–531.Google Scholar

Germany, J and McGowen, M (2008) E-constituent relationship management for state legislators. White Paper. Washington, DC: George Washington University.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, K (2011) Communicating with Congress: Perceptions of Citizen Advocacy on Capitol Hill. Washington, DC: Congressional Management Foundation.Google Scholar

Grimmer, J (2013) Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why it Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grohs, S, Adam, C and Knill, C (2016) Are some citizens more equal than others? Evidence from a field experiment. Public Administration Review 76(1), 155–164.Google Scholar

Grose, C, Malhotra, N and Van Houweling, RP (2015) Explaining explanations: how legislators explain their policy positions and how citizens react. American Journal of Political Science 59(3), 724–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hemker, J and Rink, A (2017) Multiple dimensions of bureaucratic discrimination: evidence from German welfare offices. American Journal of Political Science 61(4), 786–803.Google Scholar

Holm, S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian journal of statistics 6(2), 65–70.Google Scholar

Huang, J-H and Shyu, SH-P (2009) Building personalised relationships with customers via emails. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 20(6), 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jilke, S, Van Dooren, W and Rys, S (2018) Discrimination and administrative burden in public service markets: does a public private difference exist? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(3), 423–439.Google Scholar

Kalla, JL, Rosenbluth, FM and Teele, D (2018) Are you my mentor? A field experiment on gender, ethnicity, and political self-starters. The Journal of Politics 80(1), 337–341.Google Scholar

Lajevardi, N (2018) Access denied: exploring Muslim American representation and exclusion by state legislators. Politics, Groups, & Identities. doi: 10.1080/21565503.2018.1528161.Google Scholar

Lavecchia, L and Stagnaro, C (2019) There ain't no such thing as a free deed: the case of Italian notaries. European Journal of Law and Economics 47(2), 277–290.Google Scholar

Lewin-Jones, J and Mason, V (2014) Understanding style, language and etiquette in email communication in higher education: a survey. Research in Post- compulsory Education 19(1), 75–90.Google Scholar

McClendon, G (2016) Race and responsiveness: an experiment with South African politicians. Journal of Experimental Political Science 3(1), 60–74.Google Scholar

Millar, S (2009) Technologies and techniques. The (N)etiquette of telephone and e-mail communication. In Language and New Media. Linguistic, Cultural and Technological Evolutions. New York: Hampton Press, pp. 285–311.Google Scholar

Montgomery, J, Nyhan, B and Torres, M (2018) How conditioning on post-treatment variables can ruin your experiment and what to do about it. American Journal of Political Science 62(3), 760–775.Google Scholar

Sheer, V and Fung, T (2007) Can email communication enhance professor–student relationship and student. Journal of Educational Computing Research 37(3):289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terechshenko, Z et al. (2019) Evaluating the influence of international norms and shaming on state respect for rights: an audit experiment with foreign embassies. International Interactions 45(4), 720–735.Google Scholar

White, A, Nathan, N and Faller, J (2015) What do I need to vote? Bureaucratic discretion and discrimination by local election officials. American Political Science Review 109(1), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, EV, Hall-Phillips, A and Djamasbi, S (2015) Cognitive predictors of consumers’ intention to comply with social marketing email appeals. Computers in Human Behavior 52, 307–314.Google Scholar