¹ While the Conservative party has been well served by historians (notably Robert Blake and John Ramsden) and featured in general works on British political parties (such as Robert Mackenzie's classic but dated study), no major political scientist before Philip Norton seems to have devoted a work exclusively to the party. This is in contrast to the numerous works about the Labour party.

² Key, V. O. Jr., ‘A Theory of Critical Elections’, Journal of Politics, 17 (1955), 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sundquist, James L.: Dynamics of the Party System (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1973).Google Scholar

³ Butler, David and Kavanagh, Dennis, The British General Election of 1979 (London: Macmillan, 1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Chap. 17. Also Franklin, Mark, The Decline of Class Voting in Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

⁴ As early as 1952 Zweig, Ferdynand in The British Worker (London: Penguin Books, 1952)Google Scholar noted the way working-class culture was changing after the war.

⁵ Crewe, Ivor, Bo Särlvik and James Alt, ‘Partisan Dealignment in Britain, 1964–74’, British Journal of Political Science, 7 (1977), 129–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶ Kavanagh, , Thatcherism and British Politics.Google Scholar

⁷ See Holmes, , The First Thatcher Government 1979–1983, p. 209.Google Scholar

⁸ Steinfels, Peter, The Neo-Conservatives (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979).Google Scholar

⁹ Charlot, Monica, ‘Doctrine et image: le thatcherisme est-il un populisme?’Google Scholar in Leruez, , ed., Le Thatcherisme.Google Scholar

¹⁰ For a synoptic view of the intellectual origins of the New Right by one of its supporters, see Green, David G., The New Conservatism: The Counter Revolution in Political, Economic and Social Thought (New York: St Martin's Press, 1987).Google Scholar

¹¹ See list of Members appended to Articles of Incorporation lodged with Secretary of State for Illinois, 6 November 1947. Also see Schmolders, Gunter, ‘Ludwig Erhard and the Mont Pelerin Society’, German Economic Review, 10 (1972), 71–8.Google Scholar

¹² Balladur, Edouard, Je crois en l'Homme plus qu'en l'État (Paris: Flammarion, 1987), p. 93.Google Scholar I am indebted to Ezra Suleiman for this reference.

¹³ Keegan, , Mrs Thatcher's Economic Experiment.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Krieger, , Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Decline, p. 13.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Bulpitt, Jim, ‘The Discipline of the New Democracy: Mrs Thatcher's Statecraft’, Political Studies, 34 (1986), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Walters, Alan, Britain's Economic Renaissance: Margaret Thatcher's Reforms 1979–1984.Google Scholar

¹⁷ ‘The Conservative Party – From Pragmatism to Ideology … and Back’, West European Politics, 6 (1983), 56–74.Google Scholar

¹⁸ I now think it might be preferable to turn the triad into a quartet by distinguishing the ‘free’ (or degree of competition in the labour market) from the ‘collective’ (or degree of organization of the market) in ‘bargaining’. ‘Collectivity’ is low in the United States where a relatively low proportion of the labour-force and none of the employers are organized into unions but competition in the labour market is high. The reverse is the case in Sweden. Yet both countries over the postwar period as a whole have been more economically successful than the United Kingdom. I hope that this ‘impossible triad’ formulation is compatible with either a Keynesian or a monetarist analysis. Although a monetarist presumably would resist the implication that the rate of unemployment that does not accelerate inflation could be reduced by constraining competition among unions (i.e. reducing the ‘free’ in ‘free collective bargaining’), he would hold that unions as such (i.e. the ‘collective’ in ‘free collective bargaining’) by forcing wages above the competitive equilibrium price create unemployment. Interestingly the impossibility of the triad seems to be independent of capitalism: both communism (and presumably feudalism) have no place for free collective bargaining and apparently achieve a high level of price stability and a low level of unemployment (although also a low level of economic growth).

¹⁹ Employment Policy, Cmnd 6527.

²⁰ Leruez, Jacques, ‘La gestion de l'économie britannique: 1979–1983’Google Scholar, in Leruez, , ed., Le Thatcherisme: ‘non pas sans le savoir mais sans trop le dire’ (p. 23).Google Scholar

²¹ Calmfors, Lars and Driffill, John, ‘Centralization of Wage Bargaining: Bargaining Structure, Corporation and Macroeconomic Performance’, Economic Policy, 6 (1988), 15–62Google Scholar; Keegan, , Mrs Thatcher's Economic Experiment.Google Scholar

²² Calmfors, and Driffill, , ‘Centralization of Wage Bargaining’Google Scholar; Freeman, Richard, ‘Labour Market Institutions and Economic Performance’, Economic Policy, 6 (1988), 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²³ Olson, Mancur, The Rise and Decline of Nations (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

²⁴ Bain, G. S. and Price, Robert, Profiles of Union Growth (Oxford: Blackwell, 1980).Google Scholar

²⁵ Vickers, John and Yarrow, George, Privatization: An Economic Analysis (Boston: MIT Press, 1988)Google Scholar, Chap. 8; and Holmes, , The First Thatcher Government, pp. 170–1.Google Scholar

²⁶ Schmolders, , ‘Ludwig Erhard and the Mont Pelerin Society’, p. 78.Google Scholar

²⁷ Berlin, Isaiah, ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ in Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969).Google Scholar

²⁸ Crewe, Ivor and Searing, Donald, ‘Ideological Change in the British Conservative Party’, American Political Science Review, 82 (1988), 361–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁹ Norton, Philip and Aughey, Arthur, Conservatives and Conservatism (London: Temple Smith, 1981).Google Scholar

³⁰ Butler, David and Stokes, Donald, Political Change in Britain, 2nd edn (London: Macmillan, 1974), Chaps 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³¹ Crewe, Ivor, ‘The Labour Party and the Electorate’ in Kavanagh, Dennis, ed., The Politics of the Labour Party (London: Allen & Unwin, 1982).Google Scholar

³² Hirschman, Albert, Shifting Involvements (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

³³ Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (Chicago: Harper & Row, 1957).Google Scholar

³⁴ Young, and Sloman, , The Thatcher Phenomenon.Google Scholar

³⁵ Jenkins, , Mrs Thatcher's Revolution: The Ending of the Socialist Era.Google Scholar

³⁶ Egremont, Lord, Wyndham and Children First (London: Macmillan, 1968).Google Scholar

³⁷ Hall, Stuart, ‘The Great Moving Right Show’Google Scholar in Hall, and Jacques, , eds, The Politics of Thatcherism.Google Scholar

³⁸ Jessop, Bob et al. , ‘Authoritarian Populism, Two Nations and Thatcherism’, New Left Review, No. 147 (1984), 32–60.Google Scholar

³⁹ Rose, Richard, Do Parties Make a Difference? (London: Macmillan, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar