Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:26:23.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Austerity and Anti-Austerity: The Political Economy of Refusal in ‘Low-Resistance’ Models of Capitalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

David J. Bailey  and
Saori Shibata
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In contrast to much of the political economy literature, this article explores acts of refusal that obstruct attempts to impose austerity measures on advanced industrial democracies. It thereby complements a literature that has thus far focused far more upon the (apparently unobstructed) imposition of austerity. In doing so, it uses two typically ‘low-resistance’ countries – Japan and the UK –as least-likely cases and finds that austerity is rarely uncontested. Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis, it highlights the ‘causal recipes’ sufficient for both (1) anti-austerity activity to have a significant impact on austerity proposals and (2) the smooth (unobstructed) imposition of austerity. The politics of austerity is shown to be better understood as an iterative interaction between proposals for austerity and the acts of refusal they encounter. These obstacles to austerity appear more straightforward to activate effectively in Japan’s coordinated model of capitalism, whilst the UK’s liberal market economy tends to generate more innovative forms of dissent that (if they are sufficiently militant) provide an alternative route towards the obstruction of austerity.

Keywords

austerityanti-austeritypolitical economyUKJapanfsQCA
Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 683 - 709
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham (email: [email protected]); Leiden Institute for Area Studies, Leiden University (email: [email protected]). Details of each of the fourteen austerity proposals discussed in this article are presented in full online (https://antiausteritylowresistancecapitalism.wordpress.com/), thereby allowing both transparency and replicability. Earlier versions of the article were presented at the CPERN mid-term conferences in 2014 (Vienna) and 2016 (Ljubljana), EISA Annual Conference 2015 (Sicily), BISA-IPEG Annual Conference 2015 (Manchester), Warwick New Directions in IPE 2015, SPERI conference 2016, Colloquium on European civil society, politics and democracy (University of Jyväskylä 2015), Leiden Political Economy Group 2016, and the Workshop on Resistance and Alternatives to Austerity, Centre for Urban Research on Austerity (CURA) at De Montfort University 2016. We are grateful for comments from André Broome, Ian Bruff, Phil Cerny, Liam Clegg, Mònica Clua-Losada, Crystal Ennis, Adam Fishwick, Niilo Kauppi, Nicholas Kiersey, Markku Lonkila, Phoebe Moore, Len Seabrooke, Liam Stanley, Wanda Vrasti, Jue Wang and Matt Watson. The four anonymous reviewers each provided extremely helpful and detailed comments, and Hugh Ward assisted us enormously in his editorial guidance. All remaining errors are our own. Online appendices are available at http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0007123416000624

References

Adkins, Lisa. 2015. Disobedient Workers, the Law and the Making of Unemployment Markets. Sociology: 1–16. doi: 10.1177/0038038515598276.Google Scholar
Afonso, Alexandre, Zartaloudis, Sotirios, and Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2015. How Party Linkages Shape Austerity Politics: Clientelism and Fiscal Adjustment in Greece and Portugal During the Eurozone Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 22 (3):315–334.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Barbiero, Omar, Favero, Carlo, Giavazzi, Francesco, and Paradisi, Matteo. 2015. Austerity in 2009-2013, Working Paper No. 20827. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w20827.Google Scholar
Ali, Mazher. 2011. Class, Race, and the Attacks on Public Employees. Race, Poverty & the Environment 18 (1):27–29.Google Scholar
Bailey, David J. 2014. Contending the Crisis: What Role for Extra-Parliamentary British Politics? British Politics 9 (1):68–92.Google Scholar
Bailey, David J. 2015. Resistance is Futile? The Impact of Disruptive Protest in the ‘Silver Age of Permanent Austerity. Socio-Economic Review 13 (1):5–32.Google Scholar
Ball, James. 2012. Government’s Work Experience: What are the Schemes, and Do They Work? The Guardian, 22 February.Google Scholar
Ban, Cornel. 2015. Austerity Versus Stimulus? Understanding Fiscal Policy Change at the International Monetary Fund Since the Great Recession. Governance 28 (2):167–183.Google Scholar
Beatty, Christina, and Fothergill, Steve. 2015. Disability Benefits in an Age of Austerity. Social Policy and Administration 49 (2):161–181.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2015. Process Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practice. In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytical Tool, edited by Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel, 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy, and Pontusson, Jonas. 2012. Coping with Crisis: An Introduction. In Coping With Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession, edited by Nancy Bermeo and Jonas Pontusson, 1–32. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bernburg, Jón Gunnar. 2015. Economic Crisis and Popular Protest in Iceland, January 2009: The Role of Perceived Economic Loss and Political Attitudes in Protest Participation and Support. Mobilization 20 (2):231–252.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boycott Workfare. 2013. In 2012 You Helped Stem Workfare. In 2013 Let’s Win More! Available from http://www.boycottworkfare.org/?p=1934, accessed 1 March 2016.Google Scholar
Boycott Workfare. 2014. 2014: Two Weeks in and Already Winning! Available from http://www.boycottworkfare.org/?p=3260, accessed 1 March 2016.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert. 2012. The Four Fallacies of Contemporary Austerity Policies: The Lost Keynesian Legacy. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (1):283–312.Google Scholar
Bramall, Rebecca, Gilbert, Jeremy, and Meadway, James. 2016. What is Austerity? New Formations 87:119–140.Google Scholar
Briscoe, Forrest, Gupta, Abhinav, and Anner, Mark S.. 2015. Social Activism and Practice Diffusion: How Activist Tactics Affect Non-Targeted Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 60 (2):300–332.Google Scholar
Browne, James, and Elming, William. 2015. The Effect of the Coalition’s Tax and Benefit Changes on Household Incomes and Work Incentives. IFS Briefing Note BN 159. Available from http://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/publications/bns/BN159.pdf, accessed 1 March 2016.Google Scholar
Cameron, David R. 2012. European Fiscal Responses to the Great Recession. In Coping With Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession, edited by Nancy Bermeo and Jonas Pontusson, 91–129. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Carter, April. 2005. Direct Action and Democracy Today. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Clift, Ben, and Ryner, Magnus. 2014. Joined at the Hip, But Pulling Apart? Franco-German Relations, the Eurozone Crisis and the Politics of Austerity. French Politics 12 (2):136–163.Google Scholar
Crotty, James. 2012. The Great Austerity War: What Caused the US Deficit Crisis and Who Should Pay to Fix It? Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (1):79–104.Google Scholar
Culpepper, Pepper D. 2015. The Political Economy of Unmediated Democracy: Italian Austerity Under Mario Monti. West European Politics 37 (6):1264–1281.Google Scholar
Doherty, Brian, Plows, Alexandra, and Wall, Derek. 2003. ‘The Preferred Way of Doing Things’: The British Direct Action Movement. Parliamentary Affairs 56:669–686.Google Scholar
Dow, Sheila. 2015. The Role of Belief in the Case for Austerity Policies. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 26 (1):29–42.Google Scholar
Dukelow, Fiona. 2015. ‘Pushing Against an Open Door’: Reinforcing the Neo-Liberal Policy Paradigm in Ireland and the Impact of EU Intrusion. Comparative European Politics 13 (1):93–111.Google Scholar
Dukelow, Fiona, and Considine, Mairéad. 2014. Between Retrenchment and Recalibration: The Impact of Austerity on the Irish Social Protection System. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 41 (2):55–72.Google Scholar
Edmiston, Daniel. 2014. The Age of Austerity: Contesting the Ethical Basis and Financial Sustainability of Welfare Reform in Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 22 (2):118–131.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, Margarita. 2008. Welfare and Capitalism in Postwar Japan: Party, Bureaucracy, and Business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Exadaktylos, Theofanis, and Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2014. Quid Pro Quo: Political Trust and Policy Implementation in Greece During the Age of Austerity. Politics and Policy 42 (1):160–183.Google Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio. 2008. The European Welfare State: Golden Achievements, Silver Prospects. West European Politics 31 (1–2):82–107.Google Scholar
Gamble, Andrew. 2015. Austerity as Statecraft. Parliamentary Affairs 68 (1):42–57.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Jane, and Ansell, Ben. 2015. The Dynamics of Social Investment: Human Capital, Activation, and Care. In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, edited by Pablo Beramendi, Siljia Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt and Hanspeter Kriesi, 282–304. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guajardo, Jaime, Leigh, Daniel, and Pescatori, Andrea. 2014. Expansionary Austerity? International Evidence. Journal of the European Economic Association 12 (4):949–968.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heald, David, and Hood, Christopher. 2014. The Politics of Fiscal Squeeze. In When the Party’s Over: The Politics of Fiscal Squeeze in Perspective (Proceedings of the British Academy 197) , edited by Christopher Hood, David Heald and Rozana Himaz, 3–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, Christoph. 2014. Structural Adjustment and Neoliberal Convergence in Labour Markets and Welfare: The Impact of the Crisis and Austerity Measures on European Economic and Social Models. Competition and Change 18 (2):111–130.Google Scholar
Hlepas, Nikolaos-Komninos. 2016. Is it the Twilight of Decentralization? Testing the Limits of Functional Reforms in the Era of Austerity. International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (2):273–290.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huke, Nikolai, Clua-Losada, Mònica, and Bailey, David J.. 2015. Disrupting the European Crisis: A Critical Political Economy of Contestation, Subversion and Escape. New Political Economy 20 (5):725–751.Google Scholar
Immergut, Ellen M., and Abou-Chadi, Tarik. 2014. How Electoral Vulnerability Affects Pensions Politics: Introducing a Concept, Measure and Empirical Application. European Journal of Political Research 53 (2):269–287.Google Scholar
Johansson, Anna, and Vinthagen, Stellan. 2016. Dimensions of Everyday Resistance: An Analytical Framework. Critical Sociology 42 (3):417–435.Google Scholar
Jordana, Jacint. 2014. Multiple Crises and Policy Dismantling in Spain: Political Strategies and Distributive Implications. Political Studies Review 12:224–238.Google Scholar
Karamessini, Maria, and Rubery, Jill, eds. 2013. Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karyotis, Georgios, and Rüdig, Wolfgang. 2015. Blame and Punishment? The Electoral Politics of Extreme Austerity in Greece. Political Studies 63 (1):2–24.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, Michael Baggesen, and Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian. 2013. Partisan Effects on Welfare State Retrenchment: Empirical Evidence From a Measurement of Government Intentions. Social Policy & Administration 47:50–71.Google Scholar
König, Pascal, forthcoming. Unpopular Policies and the Imperative of Justification: Putting the Monti Government’s Reform Communication in a Comparative Perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2015.1005930.Google Scholar
Konzelmann, Suzanne J. 2014. The Political Economics of Austerity. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (4):701–741.Google Scholar
Ladi, Stella. 2014. Austerity Politics and Administrative Reform: The Eurozone Crisis and Its Impact Upon Greek Public Administration. Comparative European Politics 12 (2):184–208.Google Scholar
Lindvall, Johannes, and Rueda, David. 2013. The Insider-Outsider Dilemma. British Journal of Political Science 44 (2):460–475.Google Scholar
McMenamin, Iain, Breen, Michael, and Muñoz-Portillo, Juan. 2015. Austerity and Credibility in the Eurozone. European Union Politics 16 (1):45–66.Google Scholar
Malik, Shiv. 2012a. Holland & Barrett Pulls Out of Jobseekers’ Scheme. The Guardian, 6 July.Google Scholar
Malik, Shiv. 2012b. Scope Quits Mandatory Work Scheme. The Guardian, 12 December.Google Scholar
Malik, Shiv. 2014. DWP Orders Man to Work Without Pay for Company That Let Him Go. The Guardian, 3 November.Google Scholar
Matsaganis, Manos, and Leventi, Chrysa. 2014. The Distributional Impact of Austerity and the Recession in Southern Europe. South European Society and Politics 19 (3):393–412.Google Scholar
Mercille, Julien. 2014. The Role of the Media in Fiscal Consolidation Programmes: The Case of Ireland. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (2):281–300.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2013. Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Naczyk, Marek, and Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin. 2015. Solidarity Against All Odds: Trade Unions and the Privatization of Pensions in the Age of Dualization. Politics and Society 43 (3):361–384.Google Scholar
Nowak, Jörg, and Gallas, Alexander. 2014. Mass Strikes Against Austerity in Western Europe – A Strategic Assessment. Global Labour Journal 5 (3):306–321.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Dimitris, Stephenson, Niamh, and Tsianos, Vassilis. 2008. Escape Routes: Control and Subversion in the 21st Century. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Pavolini, Emmanuele, León, Margarita, Guillén, Ana M., and Ascoli, Ugo. 2015. From Austerity to Permanent Strain? The EU and Welfare State Reform in Italy and Spain. Comparative European Politics 13 (1):56–76.Google Scholar
Peck, Jamie, Theodore, Nik, and Brenner, Neil. 2012. Neoliberalism Resurgent? Market Rule after the Great Recession. The South Altlantic Quarterly 111 (2):265–288.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pimlott, Daniel, and Briscoe, Simon. 2010. CPI Linking ‘Not Best’ for Benefits and Pensions, Say Experts. Financial Times, 31 August.Google Scholar
Plümper, Thomas, Troeger, Vera E., and Winner, Hannes. 2009. Why is There No Race to the Bottom in Capital Taxation? International Studies Quarterly 53:761–786.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C., Drass, Kriss A., and Davey, Sean. 2006. Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0. Tucson, AZ: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona. Available from http://www.u.arizona.edu/~cragin/fsQCA/software.shtml, accessed 1 March 2016.Google Scholar
Rees, James, Whitworth, Adam, and Carter, Elle. 2014. Support for All in the UK Work Programme? Differential Payments, Same Old Problem. Social Policy and Administration 48 (2):221–239.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Armin, and Streeck, Wolfgang, eds. 2013. Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Schneider, Carsten Q., and Wagemann, Claudius. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter H. 2014. Why Government Fails So Often: And How It Can Do Better. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shahidi, Faraz V. 2015. Welfare Capitalism in Crisis: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Labour Market Policy Responses to the Great Recession. Journal of Social Policy 44 (4):659–686.Google Scholar
Shibata, Saori. 2016. Resisting Japan’s Neoliberal Model of Capitalism: Intensification and Change in Contemporary Patterns of Class Struggle. British Journal of Industrial Relations 54:496–521.Google Scholar
Stanley, Liam. 2014. ‘We’re Reaping What We Sowed’: Everyday Crisis Narratives and Acquiescence to the Age of Austerity. New Political Economy 19 (6):895–917.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2011. The Crises of Democratic Capitalism. New Left Review 71, September-October 2011:5–29.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2013. Will Expansion Work? On Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Comparative European Politics 11 (6):722–728.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, Peter. 2002. The Silver Age of the Welfare State: Perspectives on Resilience. Journal of Social Policy 31:597–621.Google Scholar
Thomas, Mark P., and Tufts, Steven. 2016. Austerity, Right Populism, and the Crisis of Labour in Canada. Antipode 48 (1):212–230.Google Scholar
Timmins, Nicholas. 2015. The Coalition and Society (IV): Welfare. In The Coalition Effect: 2010-2015 , edited by Anthony Seldon and Mike Finn, 317–344. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
TUC. 2011. Statement After Pensions Meeting. Available from https://www.tuc.org.uk/economic-issues/pensions-and-retirement/statement-after-pensions-meeting, accessed 1 March 2016.Google Scholar
Vis, Barbara. 2012. The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses. Sociological Methods and Research 41 (1):168–198.Google Scholar
Vis, Barbara. 2016. Taking Stock of the Comparative Literature on the Role of Blame Avoidance Strategies in Social Policy Reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 18 (2):122–137.Google Scholar
Vis, Barbara, Kersbergen, Kees van, and Hylands, Tom. 2011. To What Extent Did the Financial Crisis Intensify the Pressure to Reform the Welfare State? Social Policy and Administration 45 (4):338–353.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 2010. Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare, and Social Insecurity. Sociological Forum 25 (2):197–220.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul, Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, and Stewart, Marianne C.. 2015. The Economic and Electoral Consequences of Austerity Policies in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs 68 (1):4–24.Google Scholar
Worth, Owen. 2013. Resistance in the Age of Austerity: Nationalism, the Failure of the Left and the Return of God. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Bailey and Shibata supplementary material

Appendix

Download Bailey and Shibata supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 110 KB